Background. Osteoarthritis of basal joint of the thumb represents one of the commonest degenerative diseases of the hand and wrist region. Depending on the severity of clinical symptoms surgical treatment is often recommended. Resection arthroplasty of the CMC joint with tendon interposition can be regarded as the gold standard. The aim of our study is to compare the Burton Pellegrini technique with a new modified technique of resection arthroplasty with interposition of local capsule tissue. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 2 groups of patients. Two Consultant Surgeons took part in the study, one for each group, with each consultant performing trapeziectomies using only one of the techiniques for all his patients. The first group underwent trapeziectomy and local capsule interposition. It consists of 26 patients with a female/male ratio of 20/6, an average age of 64 years (range 53–88), an average follow up of 3.15 years (range 9–1) and a left/right ratio of 16/10. The second group underwent a standard Burton Pellegrini including flexor tendon interposition. It consists of 13 patients with a female/male ratio of 5/8, an average age of 68 years (range 58–85), an average follow up of 4.46 years (range 9–1) and a left/right ratio of 5/8. The outcomes were compared using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. A 2-tailed independent samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of our data. Results. We found that there is significant difference between the two procedures only on the ability of working in present, t = 2.153 and p = 0.038. However, there is no significant difference between the other parameters we examined: overall hand function, t = 0.237 and p = 0.814; activities of daily living using the operated hand, t = 0.194 and p = 0.847; activities of daily living using both hands, t = 0.184 and p = 0.855; overall activities of daily living, t = 0.204 and p = 0.839; pain, t = 0.123 and p = 0.903; aesthetics, t = 1.063 and p = 0.295; satisfaction, t = 0.628 and p = 0.534; total score, t = 0.509 and p = 0.613. Furthermore, the overall score for the two procedures suggests that there is no significant difference between them. Conclusions. The new modified procedure is simpler and quicker than the traditional operation and avoids the morbidity of tendon harvesting. The overall outcome score for the two operations is equal, suggesting that there is no advantage to the more complex procedure. We have shown a difference between the two procedures in post op working ability, being better in the group with local capsule interposition

Objective. High grade hallux rigidus is a forefoot deformity characterized by a limitation of dorsiflexion of the first toe associated with pain, and severe damage of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Most authors recommended resection arthroplasty or arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. The aim of this study was to present the results of our series of 42 consecutive cases of severe hallux rigidus treated by resection of the first metatarsal head and implant of a poly D-L lactic (PDLLA) bioreabsorbable spacer to promote the interposition of fibrous tissue to preserve the range of motion of the joint. Material and methods. Forty-two feet in 27 patients affected by high grade hallux rigidus were included in the study. Surgical treatment consisted of resection of the first metatarsal head and positioning of a poly D-L lactic acid (PDLLA) bioreabsorbable implant. Post-operative care consisted in gauze bandage of the forefoot, and immediate weight-bearing with talus shoes for 3 weeks. All patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated preoperatively and checked at a mean 6 (5–7) year follow-up. Results. No intraoperative complication occurred. No sinus formation were observed. All implants resulted well tolerated by the patients. Mean AOFAS score was 42±14 preoperatively and 81±9 postoperatively. Mean preoperative metatarsophalangeal joint ROM was 27±17 degrees and mean postoperative metatarsophalangeal joint ROM was 75±8 degrees. Conclusions. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty using bioreabsorbable implant demonstrated to be an effective surgical option for treatment of high grade hallux rigidus, thank to its ability to promote fibrous tissue formation during its reabsorption

Introduction. The action of the radial head in the stability of the elbow is currently admitted. Its conservation is not always possible in complex fractures. The association with a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow leads to a higher risk of instability of the elbow joint and also at a longer term to degenerative changes. Some authors recommend the use of metallic radial head implant, acting as a spacer. The results seems encouraging but should the resection arthroplasty associated with the repair of the medial collateral ligament be abandoned?. Material and methods. In an amount of 35 consecutive patients who were taken in charge for an elbow dislocation 26 were included in this retrospective study, 13 of them had the association of a dislocation and a fracture of the radial head. In all 13 cases the radial head was considered as inadequate with a conservative treatment and was resected. The patients were assessed clinically according to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) and the Mayo elbow performance index with a mean follow-up of 13 years (ranging from 5 to 15). The degenerative changes were assessed on plan × rays and an additional axial view according to the 4 stages described by Morrey. Results. No redislocation occurred. According to the Broberg/Morrey index 92% of the patients were considered as having a good result. They returned to work with no hindering. Signs of osteoarthritis grade 1 or 2 were observed and were clinically well tolerated. There was no difference for this item between the patients who conserved their radial head and those who sustained a resection. All patients were satisfied although they were protecting their joint against overuse while working. Discussion. The studies about the use of prosthesis of the radial head offer similar functional results. Degenerative changes on the trochleo ulnar joint are identical in all type of treatment. In order to prevent stiffness in the elbow joint an early post operative rehabilitation is recommended, it justifies a surgical stabilization associated with the use of an adapted dynamic splint. Conclusion. In case of elbow dislocation with a fracture of the radial head when its preservation is impossible, the resection without any prosthetic replacement remains a reasonable option if associated with a repair of the medial collateral ligament. At long term the functional results are still good with mild signs of osteoarthritis eliminating ipso facto the problem of an implant survivorship