The demand for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has grown significantly in recent years. The two major fixation methods for stems in revision TKA include cemented and ‘hybrid’ fixation. We explore the optimal fixation method using data from recent, well-designed comparative studies. We performed a systematic review of comparative studies published within the last 10 years with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. To allow for missing data, a random-effects meta-analysis of all available cases was performed. The odds ratio (OR) for the relevant outcome was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. The effects of small studies were analyzed using a funnel plot, and asymmetry was assessed using Egger's test. The primary outcome measure was all-cause failure. Secondary outcome measures included all-cause revision, aseptic revision and radiographic failure. There was a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems when compared to cemented stems (p = 0.006) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.87). Heterogeneity was 4.3% and insignificant (p = 0.39). There was a trend toward superior hybrid performance for all other outcome measures including all-cause re-revision, aseptic re-revision and radiographic failure. Recent evidence suggests a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems in revision TKA. There is also a trend favoring the use of hybrid stems for all outcome variables assessed in this study. This is the first time a significant difference in outcome has been demonstrated through systematic review of these two modes of stem fixation. We therefore recommend the use, where possible, of hybrid stems in revision TKA

Background. As life expectancy increases, the number of octogenarians requiring primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. Recently, primary TKA has become a common treatment option in octogenarians. However, surgeons are still hesitant about performing revision TKA on octogenarians because of concerning about risk- and cost-benefit. The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative complications and mid-term survival in octogenarians following primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 231 primary TKAs and 41 revision TKAs performed on octogenarians between 2000 and 2016. The mean age was 81.9 for primary TKA and 82.3 for revision TKA (p=0.310). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was not different, but the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was higher in revision TKA (4.4 vs. 4.8, p=0.003). The mean follow-up period did not differ (3.8 vs. 3.5 years, p=0.451). The WOMAC scores and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. The incidence of postoperative complication and survival rate (end point; death determined by telephone or mail communication with patient or family) were investigated. Results. The postoperative WOMAC and ROM were better in primary TKA (33.1 vs. 47.2, p<0.001; 128.9° vs. 113.6°, p<0.001). The most common postoperative complication was delirium in both groups (7.4% vs. 14.6%, p=0.131). There were no differences in the specific complication rates between the two groups. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 87.2% and 62.9%, respectively, in primary TKA and 82.1% and 42.2%, respectively, in revision TKA (p=0.017). Conclusions. Both primary and revision TKAs are viable options for octogenarians when considering the clinical results and mid-term survival. Delirium needs to be managed appropriately as the most common complication in both primary and revision TKAs for octogenarians

Aim. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) aggravates an already difficult treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). The prevalence of drug-resistant pathogens varies across countries and increases over time. Regular monitoring of bacteriological analyses should be performed. Due to many factors influencing the AMR, the correct choice of antimicrobial management remains arguable. The primary purpose of this retrospective study was to identify and compare causative bacteria and to compare the incidence of antibiotic resistance between the septic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and septic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Method. A review of all revision TKAs and revision THAs, undertaken between 2007 and 2020 in a tertiary referral centre, was performed. Included were cases meeting the consensus criteria for PJI, in which an organism has been identified. There were no major differences in tissue sampling between revision TKAs and revision THAs over time. Results. A total of 228 bacterial strains, isolated after revision TKA and THA, were analysed for their resistance to 20 different antibiotics. There was a statistically significant higher occurrence of Gram-negative bacteria (p=0.002) and Enterococcus species (p=0.026) identified after revision THAs compared to TKA. The comparison of antibiotic resistance between revision TKAs and revision THAs was statistically significant in 9 of 20 analysed antibiotics. Pathogens isolated after revision THA were much more resistant compared to pathogens isolated after revision TKA. Resistance in revision THAs was significantly higher to oxacillin (p=0.03), ciprofloxacin (p<0.001), levofloxacin (p<0.001), moxifloxacin (p=0.005), clindamycin (p<0.001), co-trimoxazole (p<0.001), imipenem (p=0.01), rifampicin (p=0.005) and tetracycline (p=0.009). There was no significantly higher resistance of pathogens isolated after revision TKAs detected. No statistically significant difference in antibiotic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria between revision TKA and revision THA was observed. Conclusions. The occurrence and the resistance of bacteria to antibiotics differs significantly between revision TKAs and revision THAs. This has implications on of the choice of empirical antibiotic in revision surgery as well as prophylactic antibiotic in primary surgery, depending on the joint that is to be replaced

Aim. Several options to standardize the definition of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been created including the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), 2018 Intentional Consensus Meeting (ICM), and the 2019 proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Synovial fluid biomarkers have been investigated in an effort to simplify and improve the diagnosis of PJI. The aim of this study was to test the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values (PPV and NPV, respectively) of a calprotectin point of care (POC) test for diagnosing PJI in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients comparing different sets of criteria (2013 MSIS, 2018 ICM, and 2019 EBJIS criteria) used to define patients as with or without infection. Method. From October 2018 to January 2020 and under IRB approval 123 intraoperative samples of synovial fluid were prospectively collected at two academic hospitals in the same institution from revision TKA patients. All patients underwent standard clinical and laboratory evaluation for PJI at our institution, allowing for categorization using the 3 criteria. Patients were adjudicated by 2 blinded and independent reviewers for the 3 sets of criteria. The 3 criteria agreed 91.8% of the time. Four likely cases by the 2019 proposed EBJIS were considered unlikely and 1 inconclusive case by the 2018 ICM was considered not infected for the purposes of analysis. Calprotectin POC testing followed manufacturer's instructions using a threshold of >50 mg/L to indicate PJI. Sensitivities, specificities, PPV, NPV, and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated for the 3 sets of criteria. Results. Using 2013 MSIS criteria the calprotectin POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV AUC of 98.1%, 95.7%, 94.5%, 98.5%, and 0.969, respectively. Using 2018 ICM the POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and (AUC) of 98.2%, 98.5%, 98.2%, 98.5%, and 0.984, respectively. Using the 2019 proposed EBJIS criteria the POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and area under the curve (AUC) of 93.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 94.2%, and 0.966, respectively. Conclusions. The calprotectin lateral flow POC test has an excellent sensitivity and specificity regardless of the set of criteria used to define PJI. These results are promising and suggest that the calprotectin lateral flow test may be used as a rule out test in a cost-conscious health care model or when conventional diagnostic tools may not be available. Further investigations of the calprotectin PCO test must be completed to validate these results

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed secondary to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These poor outcomes may be further complicated by the development of postoperative infection requiring aggressive antibiotic treatment. However, this antibiotic overuse may suppress patients' native bacterial flora, leading to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With the increased demand for primary TKAs and expected rise in revision TKA due to PJI, it is important to identify factors contributing to CDI. Therefore, we aimed to study the: 1) incidence, 2) demographics, length of stay (LOS), and total costs, and 3) risk factors and mortality associated with CDI in revision TKA patients. The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for all individuals diagnosed with PJI and who underwent revision TKA between 2009 and 2013. Patients who developed CDI during their in-patient hospital stay were identified, yielding 83,806 patients (799 with CDI) with a mean age of 65 (S.D.=11.2). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between hospital- and patient-specific characteristics and the development of CDI. During the study period, the overall incidence of CDI after revision TKA was 1%. These patients were significantly older (mean age 69.05 vs. 65.52 yrs), had greater LOS (median 11 vs. 5 days), had greater costs ($30,612.93 vs. 18,873.75), and had higher in-hospital mortality (3.6 vs. 0.5%, p < 0 .001 for all) compared to those without infection. Patients with CDI were more likely to be treated in urban, not-for-profit, medium or large bed-sized hospitals located in the Northeast or Midwest (p < 0 .05 for all). Patients with underlying depression (OR 4.267, p=0.007) or fluid/electrolyte disorders (OR 3.48, p=0.001) were more likely to develop infection. Although CDI is a rare event following revision TKA, it can have detrimental consequences. Our report demonstrates that CDI is associated with longer LOS, higher costs, and greater in-hospital mortality. With increased legislative pressure to lower healthcare expenditures, it is crucial to identify means of preventing costly complications

The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement (TKA) remains a challenge. To accomplish the goals of revision TKA, the surgeon needs to choose the appropriate implant design to “fix the problem,” achieve proper component placement and alignment, and obtain robust short- and long-term fixation. Proper identification and classification of the extent of bone loss and deformity will aid in preoperative planning. Extensive bone loss may be due to progressive osteolysis (a mechanism of failure), or as a result of intraoperative component removal. The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) is a useful classification system that individually describes femoral and tibial defects by the appearance, severity, and location of bone defects. This system provides a guideline to treatment and enables preoperative planning on radiographs. In Type 1 defects, femoral and tibial defects are characterised by minor contained deficiencies at the bone-implant interface. Metaphyseal bone is intact and the integrity of the joint line is not compromised. In this scenario, the best reconstruction option is to increase the thickness of bone resection and to fill the defect with cancellous bone graft or cement. Type 2 defects are characterised by deficient metaphyseal bone involving one or more femoral condyle(s) or tibial plateau(s). The peripheral rim of cortical bone may be intact or partially compromised, and the joint line is abnormal. Reconstruction options for a Type 2A defect include impaction bone grafting, cement, or more commonly, prosthetic augmentation (e.g. sleeves, augments or wedges). In Type 2B defects, metaphyseal bone of both femoral condyles or both tibial plateaus is deficient. The peripheral rim of cortical bone may be intact or partially compromised, and the joint line is abnormal. Options for a Type 2B defect include impaction grafting, bulk structural allograft, prosthetic augmentation, metaphyseal sleeves (in some cases), or metaphyseal cones. Finally, in the presence of a Type 3 deficiency, both metaphyseal and cortical bone is deficient and there is partial or complete disruption of the collateral ligament attachments. In this case, the most commonly used reconstruction options include hinged implants or megaprostheses with or without bulk structural allograft, prosthetic augmentation, and/or metaphyseal/diaphyseal sleeves or cones. Today, we are fortunate to have a wide variety of options available to aid in reconstruction of a revision TKA with massive bone loss. Historically, use of cement, bone grafting, or use of a tumor-type or hinged implant were considered the main options for reconstruction. The development and adoption of highly porous sleeves and cones has given the surgeon a new and potentially more durable option for reconstruction of previously difficult to treat defects. Using radiographs and computed tomography, surgeons are able to preoperatively classify bone loss and anticipate a reconstruction plan based upon the classification; however, it is always important to have several back-up options on hand during revision surgery in the event bone loss is worse than expected

Exposure for revision knee requires using the previous incision, employing the “quad snip”, the “Banana Peel”, or the tubercle osteotomy. The “quad snip” is a 45-degree incision of the proximal extensor mechanism that helps protect the distal insertion on the tubercle. The “banana peel,” is my exposure of choice and has been used extensively for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for more than 20 years in my community. We retrospectively reviewed use of this technique in a cohort of 100 consecutive patients who underwent tibial-femoral stemmed revision TKA. The technique involves peeling the patella tendon as a sleeve off the tibia, leaving the extensor mechanism intact with a lateral hinge of soft tissue. A quadriceps “snip” must be done proximally to avoid excessive tension. No patient has ever reported disruption of the extensor mechanism or decreased ability to extend the operative knee. With a mean Knee Society score of 176 (range, 95–200). Post-operative motion was 106 degrees. No patient reported pain over the tibial tubercle. The “banana peel” technique for exposing the knee during the revision TKA is a safe method that can be used along with a proximal quadriceps snip and does not violate the extensor mechanism, maintaining continuity of the knee extensors. As a last resort, tibial tubercle osteotomy as described by Whiteside, is preferred for revising porous coated stemmed tibial components and is repaired with cerclage wire or cables. Keep the osteotomy fragment at least 8–10cm long leaving a lateral soft tissue attachment

Metaphyseal bone loss, due to loosening, osteolysis or infection, is common with revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Small defects can be treated with screws and cement, bone graft, and non-porous metal wedges or blocks. Large defects can be treated with bulk structural allograft, impaction grafting, or highly porous metal cones. The AORI classification of bone loss in revision TKA is very helpful with pre-operative planning. Type 1 defects do not require augments or graft—use revision components with stems. Type 2A defects should be treated with non-porous metal wedges or blocks. Type 2B and 3 defects require a bulk structural allograft or porous metal cone. Highly-porous metal metaphyseal cones are a unique solution for large bone defects. Both femoral (full or partial) and tibial (full, stepped, or cone+plate) cones are available. These cones substitute for bone loss, improve metaphyseal fixation, help correct malalignment, restore joint line, and permit use of a short cemented stem. The technique for these cones involve preparing the remaining bone with a high speed burr and rasp, followed by press-fit of the cone into the remaining metaphysis. The interface is sealed with bone graft and putty. The fixation and osteoconductive properties of the outer surface allow ingrowth and biologic fixation. The revision knee component is then implanted, with antibiotic-cement, into the porous cone inner surface, which provides superior fixation compared to cementing into deficient metaphyseal bone. There are several manufacturers that provide porous cones for knee revision, but the tantalum-“trabecular metal” cones have the largest and longest clinical follow-up. The advantages of the trabecular metal cone compared to allograft include: technically easier; biologic fixation; no resorption; and lower risk of infection. The disadvantages include: difficult extraction and intermediate-term follow-up. The author has reported the results of 33 trabecular metal cones (9 femoral, 24 tibial) implanted in 27 revision cases at 2–5.7 years follow-up. One knee (2 cones) was removed for infection. All but one cone showed osseointegration. Multiple other studies have confirmed these results. Trabecular metal cones are now the author's preferred method for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision TKA

The amount of bone loss due to implant failure, loosening, or osteolysis can vary greatly and can have a major impact on reconstructive options during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Massive bone loss can threaten ligamentous attachments in the vicinity of the knee and may require use of components with additional constraint to compensate for associated ligamentous instability. Classification of bone defects can be helpful in predicting the complexity of the reconstruction required and in facilitating preoperative planning and implant selection. One very helpful classification of bone loss associated with TKA is the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Bone Defect Classification System as it provides the means to compare the location and extent of femoral and tibial bone loss encountered during revision surgery. In general, the higher grade defects (Type IIb or III) on both the femoral and tibial sides are more likely to require stemmed components, and may require the use of either structural graft or large augments to restore support for currently available modular revision components. Custom prostheses were previously utilised for massive defects of this sort, but more recently have been supplanted by revision TKA component systems with or without special metal augments or structural allograft. Options for bone defect management are: 1) Fill with cement; 2) Fill with cement supplemented by screws or K-wires; 3) Morselised bone grafting (for smaller, especially contained cavitary defects); 4) Small segment structural bone graft; 5) Impaction grafting; 6) Porous metal cones or sleeves 7) Massive structural allograft-prosthetic composites; 8) Custom implants. Of these, use of uncemented highly porous metal metaphyseal cones in combination with an initial cemented or partially cemented implant has been shown to provide versatile and highly durable results for a range of bone defects including those previously requiring structural bone graft. The hybrid fixation combination of both cement and cementless fixation of an individual tibial or femoral component has emerged as a frequent and often preferred technique. Initial secure and motionless interfaces are provided by the cemented portions of the construct, while subsequent bone ingrowth to the cementless porous metal portions is the key to long term stable fixation. As bone grows into the porous portions there is off loading and protection of the cemented interfaces from mechanical stresses. While maximizing support on intact host bone has been a longstanding fundamental principle of revision arthroplasty, this is facilitated by the use of metaphyseal cones or sleeves in combination with initial fixation into the adjacent diaphysis. Preoperative planning is facilitated by good quality radiographs, supplemented on occasion by additional imaging such as CT. Fluoroscopically controlled x-ray views may assist in diagnosing the loose implant by better revealing the interface between the implant and bone and can facilitate accurate delineation of the extent of bone deficiency present. Part of the preoperative plan is to ensure adequate range and variety of implant choices and bone graft resources for the planned reconstruction allowing for the potential for unexpected intraoperative findings such as occult fracture through deficient periprosthetic bone. While massive bone loss may compromise ligamentous attachment to bone, in the majority of reconstructions, the degree of revision implant constraint needed for proper balancing and restoration of stability is independent of the bone defect. Thus, some knees with minimal bone deficiency may require increased constraint due to the status of the soft tissues while others involving very large bone defects, especially of the cavitary sort, may be well managed with minimal constraint

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can pose significant challenges. Successful reconstruction requires a systematic approach with the ultimate goal being a well fixed and balanced knee prosthesis. Careful preoperative planning is necessary for safe exposure, component removal, and appropriate management of bone loss during revision knee surgery. Prior to surgery, the cause of failure must be understood. Revision TKA without a clear diagnosis has been shown to lead to predictable poor results. A careful history and physical examination for both intrinsic and extrinsic causes of knee pain need to be performed. An ESR and C-reactive protein should be obtained in every patient with a painful TKA and in cases of serologic abnormalities, a joint aspiration performed. The integrity of the collateral ligaments and the degree of anticipated bone loss at the time of revision needs to be established. In cases of severe collateral ligament deficiency, the need for constrained or hinged knee implants should be anticipated. Plain radiographs are needed to evaluate present component position, loosening, and osteolysis. Oblique radiographs and advanced imaging (i.e. CT or MRI) have been shown to more accurately quantify the severity of lysis compared to standard radiographs. This careful assessment can help prepare for the need of special implants, stems, wedges, or augments. Finally, patient risk stratification and medical co-management can help minimise complications following revision TKA. Optimization of potentially modifiable risk factors such as glycemic control, BMI, and preoperative hemoglobin can reduce perioperative morbidity and complications

Background. Joint line, patellar height and posterior condylar offset (PCO) are related to functional outcome such as stability and range of motion after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was (1) to determine whether revision TKA can restore the joint line, patella height and condylar offset after surgery, and (2) to assess factors associated with failed restoration. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 27 consecutive patients who underwent revision TKA. Among 27 patients, 11 patients had two-stage revision TKA due to periprosthetic joint infection while 14 patients underwent revision TKA due to aseptic loosening. In addition, there were 2 patients who had traumatic event causing a periprosthetic fracture which led to revision TKA. The joint line was measured using the distance from the adductor tubercle of the femur to the most distal portion of the medial femoral component on knee anterior-posterior radiographs. Patella height was assessed using the Caton-Deschamps method. In addition, PCO were measured relative to the tangent of the posterior cortex of the femur using knee lateral radiograph. All parameters were compared between pre- and postoperative radiographs after revision TKA. Results. After revision TKA, mean joint line elevation was 0.9 mm. Seven of 27 patients showed joint line elevation of 5 mm or more. There was no significant difference between pre- and postoperative PCO (27.6 mm and 28.1 mm, respectively; P = 0.528). Fifteen patients (56%) showed patellar baja after revision TKA. Compared to the patients with aseptic loosening, the patients with periprosthetic joint infection or fracture showed greater joint line elevation (4.1 mm and −2.2 mm, respectively; P < 0.01), smaller PCO change (1.9 mm and −1.1 mm respectively, P < 0.05). Even if the cause of revision TKA was not associated with the postoperative patellar baja, presence of preoperative patellar baja was significantly associated with postoperative patellar baja (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Overall, restoration of the joint line and PCO were achieved in contemporary revision TKA. However, the patients who underwent revision TKA due to periprosthetic joint infection or fracture showed greater joint line elevation as well as smaller PCO. In addition, the patellar height was not improved in patients with preoperative patellar baja. Further evaluation of functional outcome is needed to assess correlation between radiological and functional outcome

Aim. Despite a preoperative workup with no evidence to suspect a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) before revision surgery, routinely obtained intraoperative cultures still can be unexpectedly positive. The purpose of this study was (1) to assess the incidence of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions and (2) to determine whether a difference exists between the infection-free implant survival rate of patients with and without unexpected positive intraoperative cultures. Method. We selected patients who underwent a one-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for different reasons. Three or more separate intraoperative cultures were obtained during each procedure. A negative result was defined as less than two positive cultures with the same microorganism. An unsuspected PJI was defined as having two or more positive cultures with the same microorganism. Patients’ medical records were reviewed to collect demographics, preoperative laboratory results, culture results, and the occurrence of infection during follow-up. Results. A total of 340 and 339 patients with a presumed aseptic knee and hip revision, respectively, were analyzed. The incidence of unsuspected PJIs was 7.9% and 12.1% in the knees and hips, respectively. Of these unsuspected PJIs, the infection-free prosthetic survival rate at 2 year follow-up was 88% (95%CI 59–97) and 92% (95%CI 73–98) in knees and hips, respectively. In the knee group, the infection-free prosthetic survival rate of patients with an unsuspected PJI was significantly lower compared to that of patients with negative intraoperative culture results (88% (95%CI 59–97) versus 97% (95%CI 93–99) with p=0.01). In the hip group, there was no such a difference (92% (95%CI 73–98) versus 93% (95%CI 88–96) with p=0.41). Conclusions. We found incidences of unsuspected PJI and infection-free prosthetic survival rates that are comparable with previous studies. During follow-up after one-stage revision TKA, a higher incidence of infection was observed in patients with an unsuspected PJI. This difference was not observed in the hip revisions

Metaphyseal bone loss, due to loosening, osteolysis or infection, is common with revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Small defects can be treated with screws and cement, bone graft, and non-porous metal wedges or blocks. Large defects can be treated with bulk structural allograft, impaction grafting, or highly porous metal cones. The AORI classification of bone loss in revision TKA is very helpful with preoperative planning. Type 1 defects do not require augments or graft—use revision components with stems. Type 2A defects should be treated with non-porous metal wedges or blocks. Type 2B and 3 defects require a bulk structural allograft or porous metal cone. Trabecular metal (TM) metaphyseal cones are a unique solution for large bone defects. Both femoral (full or partial) and tibial (full, stepped, or cone+plate) TM cones are available. These cones substitute for bone loss, improve metaphyseal fixation, help correct malalignment, restore joint line, and permit use of a short cemented stem. The technique for these cones involve preparing the remaining bone with a high speed burr and rasp, followed by press-fit of the cone into the remaining metaphysis. The interface is sealed with bone graft and putty. The fixation and osteoconductive properties of the outer surface allow ingrowth and biologic fixation. The revision knee component is then cemented into the porous cone inner surface, which provides superior fixation compared to cementing into deficient metaphyseal bone. The advantages of the TM cone compared to allograft include: technically easier; biologic fixation; no resorption; and lower risk of infection. The disadvantages include: difficult extraction and intermediate-term follow-up. The author has reported the results of 33 TM cones (9 femoral, 24 tibial) implanted in 27 revision cases at 2–5.7 years follow-up. One knee (2 cones) was removed for infection. All but one cone showed osseointegration. TM cones are now the preferred method for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision TKA

Management of the patella with poor bone stock remains a challenge in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of a novel surgical technique in which widely available wires and acrylic bone cement are used in the reconstruction of a deficient patella. Twenty-eight patients (30 knees) underwent revision TKA in which a deficient patella was treated with an onlay-type prosthesis and bone-augmenting procedure, using transcortical wiring. The technique was indicated when the thickness of remnant patella was less than 8mm with variable amounts of the peripheral rim. The remaining patellar height ranged from 3.2mm to 7.3mm. Follow-up was available for all patients with a mean of 36.6 months (range, 24 to 55 months). The respective mean Knee Society scores for knee and function improved from 34.2 points (range, 18 to 65 points) and 23 points (range, 18 to 46 points) preoperatively to 73.5 points (range, 30 to 88 points) and 61points (range, 34 to 80 points) at final follow-up. The mean thickness of the patellar construct was 14.6mm (range, 12.2 – 18.3mm). One patient experienced patellar fracture during knee flexion one week after surgery. There were no complications associated with implanted hardware. A patellar bone-augmenting procedure using transcortical wiring is a straightforward technique that potentially allows firm fixation. Considering the satisfactory short- to mid-term results, we believe that this technique provides a good alternative option in addressing this challenging problem in revision TKA

Background. Management of the patella with poor bone stock remains a challenge in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of a novel surgical technique in which widely available wires and acrylic bone cement are used in the reconstruction of a deficient patella. Methods. Twenty-eight patients (30 knees) underwent revision TKA in which a deficient patella was treated with an onlay-type prosthesis and bone-augmenting procedure, using transcortical wiring. The technique was indicated when the thickness of remnant patella was less than 8mm with variable amounts of the peripheral rim. The remaining patellar height ranged from 3.2mm to 7.3mm. Follow-up was available for all patients with a mean of 36.6 months (range, 24 to 55 months). Results. The respective mean Knee Society scores for knee and function improved from 34.2 points (range, 18 to 65 points) and 23 points (range, 18 to 46 points) preoperatively to 73.5 points (range, 30 to 88 points) and 61points (range, 34 to 80 points) at final follow-up. The mean thickness of the patellar construct was 14.6mm (range, 12.2 – 18.3mm). One patient experienced patellar fracture during knee flexion one week after surgery. There were no complications associated with implanted hardware. Conclusions. A patellar bone-augmenting procedure using transcortical wiring is a straightforward technique that potentially allows firm fixation. Considering the satisfactory short- to mid-term results, we believe that this technique provides a good alternative option in addressing this challenging problem in revision TKA

The amount of bone loss due to implant failure, loosening, or osteolysis can vary greatly and can have a major impact on reconstructive options during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Massive bone loss can threaten ligamentous attachments in the vicinity of the knee and may require use of components with additional constraint to compensate for associated ligamentous instability. Classification of bone defects can be helpful in predicting the complexity of the reconstruction required and in facilitating pre-operative planning and implant selection. One very helpful classification of bone loss associated with TKA is the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Bone Defect Classification System as it provides the means to compare the location and extent of femoral and tibial bone loss encountered during revision surgery. In general, the higher grade defects (Type IIb or III) on both the femoral and tibial sides are more likely to require stemmed components, and may require the use of either structural graft or large augments to restore support for currently available modular revision components. Custom prostheses were previously utilised for massive defects of this sort, but more recently have been supplanted by revision TKA component systems with or without special metal augments or structural allograft. Options for bone defect management are: 1) Fill with cement; 2) Fill with cement supplemented by screws or K-wires; 3) Morselised bone grafting (for smaller, especially contained cavitary defects); 4) Small segment structural bone graft; 5) Impaction grafting; 6) Large prosthetic augments (cones); 7) Massive structural allograft-prosthetic composites (APC); 8) Custom implants. Maximizing support on intact host bone is a fundamental principle to successful reconstruction and frequently requires extending fixation to the adjacent diaphysis. Pre-operative planning is facilitated by good quality radiographs, supplemented on occasion by additional imaging such as CT. Fluoroscopically controlled x-ray views may assist in diagnosing the loose implant by better revealing the interface between the implant and bone and can facilitate accurate delineation of the extent of bone deficiency present. Part of the pre-operative plan is to ensure adequate range and variety of implant choices and bone graft resources for the planned reconstruction allowing for the potential for unexpected intra-operative findings such as occult fracture through deficient periprosthetic bone. Reconstruction of bone deficiency following removal of the failed implant is largely dictated by the location and extent of bone loss and the quality of bone that remains. While massive bone loss may compromise ligamentous attachment to bone, in the majority of reconstructions the degree of implant constraint needed for proper balancing and restoration of stability is independent of the bone defect. Thus some knees with minimal bone deficiency may require increased constraint due to the status of the soft tissues while others involving very large bone defects especially of the cavitary sort may be well managed with minimal constraint

The true results of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not fully understood, for a variety of understandable reasons. But it is has been clear for decades that revision without a diagnosis is likely to fail. The evaluation of the problem TKA should be systematic (follow the same scheme every time) and comprehensive (all possibilities should be considered even if one diagnosis seems obvious). Evaluation begins, as with all of medicine with a list of possible causes: the mechanisms of failure. John Moreland was the first to describe a coherent system which needed only one simple addition to be complete: 1.) Prosthetic joint infection; 2.) Extensor disruption; 3.) Patella and malrotation; 4.) Loose; 5.) Component breakage; 6.) PP fracture; 7.) Poor motion; and 8.) Tibial femoral instability. Evaluation begins with the history, where 10 questions in particular are useful: 1.) What seems to be the problem? 2.) Was the “knee” ever successful after surgery? If there was never pain relief, is the current pain, the same or different? 3.) Standard pain quality questions - Location, duration, frequency, quality, exacerbating, ameliorating. 4.) Swelling? 5.) Stiffness? 6.) Giving way? 7.) Weakness? 8.) Things “just don't feel right”? 9.) Possible sepsis questions - Fever, chills, sources, primary TKA healing. 10.) Mood, social situation?. The physical exam should cover these ten points: 1.) Active extension; 2.) Rising from chair; 3.) Gait: hip, knee alignment, knee instability; 4.) Hip (internal rotation); 5.) Inspection; 6.) Tenderness; 7.) ROM; 8.) Stability (extension and 30–45 degrees flexion; 9.) Sitting on edge of exam table (knee at 90 degrees); and 10.) Step up on low stool (stair). Investigations include: 1.) ESR + CRP; 2.) CBC; 3.) HGB- anemia; 4.) Lymphocytes- nutrition; 5.) GGT- alcohol abuse; 6.) Albumen- nutrition; 7.) HbA1c- diabetic control. Imaging includes: 1.) Single leg weightbearing AP; 2.) Lateral; 3.) Merchant; 4.) Full length (hip-knee-ankle); 5.) AP pelvis; 6.) CT scan; and 7.) (Technitium bone scan)

Introduction. Modular stems are commonly used to improve fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Hybrid fixation, in which cement is placed around the metaphysical portion of the component combined with an uncemented diaphyseal modular stem, has potential advantages including ease of insertion, improved component alignment, and ease of removal if needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical results of revision total knee arthroplasty with uncemented modular stems using a hybrid fixation technique with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Methods. 23 revision TKAs were performed in 21 patients with hybrid fixation using uncemented modular stems. 3 patients (3 knees) had died of causes unrelated to the index arthroplasty at the time of the study, and 1 patient (1 knee) was lost to the follow-up. The remaining 19 knees were clinically and radiographically evaluated for the present study. The average follow-up time was 9.5 years. The average age of the patients was 70.5 years at the time of the revision surgery. The average time between the primary and revision surgeries was 10.6 years. Results. The reasons for the revision of the 19 knees were aseptic loosening in 14 knees and breakage of polyethylene or implant in 5 knees. The mean postoperative range of motion was 110.2 degrees at the time of the most recent follow-up. The mean postoperative knee and function scores were 80.6 and 50.8, respectively. Periprosthetic radiolucencies were found adjacent to 2 tibial components and an asymptomatic cortical thickening around the end-of-stem was found in 1 tibial component. There were no intra- or postoperative complications resulting from the prosthesis implantation with this technique. Discussion. Revision TKA with hybrid fixation demonstrated excellent clinical results in terms of survival rate at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Although the ideal fixation of modular stems in revision TKA remains unclear, this study demonstrated that hybrid fïxation can be a viable option to provide durable fixation

Background. Subvastus approach for Total Knee Arthropalsty (TKA) allows a faster recovery. It is traditionally not utilized for revision surgeries because of difficulty in exposure of the knee and eversion of the patella. It is considered to have limited indications. We hypothesized that revision TKA should not really pose a problem as the exposure gained is adequate with added advantage of preserving the extensor mechanism, thereby allowing faster functional recovery. We present an analysis of the use of subvastus approach for revision TKAs. Materials and methods. 50 patients (50 knees) 37 females + 13 males with mean age 68 years underwent revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by subvastus approach between January 2006 to January 2013. All patients were prospectively evaluated by pre- and postoperative Knee Society and function score. The average follow-up was 24 months (range from 1 to 3 years) with minimum 1 year follow-up. The indications for revisions were aseptic loosening (20 knees), infection (12 knees), instability (12 knees) and peri-prosthetic fractures (6 knees). Constrained condylar prosthesis (43 knees), hinged prosthesis (6 knees) and custom made prosthesis (1 knee) were fixed using the subvastus approach. Infected knees underwent one or two staged revisions. Results. The approach provided adequate exposure in all revisions. The average Knee Society score improved from 42 to 83 and the function score from 48 to 65. The complications included medial collateral ligament injury (one case), patellar tendon avulsion (one case) and mal-tracking patella (one case). Average hospital stay was 4 days. Average blood lose was 400 ml. Conclusion. Our results compare favourably with other reported series on revision TKA. The subvastus approach can be considered for revision TKAs

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) caused by Streptococcus species are relatively common. The aim of our study was to assess outcome after treatment for early and late PJI with Streptococcus species after a follow-up of two years. For this study we retrospectively included all patients with primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip (THA) arthroplasty, a minimum of two periprosthetic tissue cultures positive for Streptococcus species and a minimum follow-up of one year. According to international guidelines patients were classified as having early or late PJI. All patients with an early PJI were treated according to a standard treatment protocol, i.e. debridement and retention of the prosthesis, followed by adequate antibiotic therapy. Patients with late PJI underwent a debridement followed by adequate antibiotic therapy or joint revision. Patients’ hospital records were reviewed and we evaluated the status of the original prosthesis after an infection. Forty cases were included; 24 early and 16 late PJI. For early PJI, open debridement was performed in all patients, after a mean of 19 (range: 9 – 80) days. At final follow-up 21 prostheses (88%) were still in situ and without clinical signs of infection. Eight cases (41%) of late PJI were successfully treated with debridement and retention. Nine patients (59%) underwent a one- or two-stage revision. At final follow-up 16 patients (100%) with late PJI had a prosthesis in situ. Streptococcus dysgalactiae species accounted for more than 50% of the early infections, followed by Streptococcus agalactiae with 30%. In case of PJI with Streptococcus species open debridement and retention of the prosthesis should be performed followed by adequate and long-term antibiotic treatment. As expected, the retention rate for early PJI is much higher than that for late PJI