Aims. There is a lack of long-term data for minimally invasive acromioclavicular (AC) joint repair. Furthermore, it is not clear if good early clinical results can be maintained over time. The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of minimally invasive AC joint reconstruction (MINAR) and compare it to corresponding short-term data. Methods. We assessed patients with a follow-up of at least five years after minimally invasive flip-button repair for high-grade AC joint dislocation. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the Constant score and a questionnaire. Ultrasound determined the coracoclavicular (CC) distance. Results of the current follow-up were compared to the short-term results of the same cohort. Results. A total of 50 patients (three females, 47 males) were successfully followed up for a minimum of five years. The mean follow-up was 7.7 years (63 months to 132 months). The overall Constant score was 94.4 points (54 to 100) versus 97.7 points (83 to 100) for the contralateral side showing a significant difference for the operated shoulder (p = 0.013) The mean difference in the CC distance between the operated and the contralateral shoulder was 3.7 mm (0.2 to 7.8; p = 0.010). In total, 16% (n = 8) of patients showed recurrent instability. All these cases were performed within the first 16 months after introduction of this technique. A total of 84% (n = 42) of the patients were able to return to their previous occupations and sport activities. Comparison of short-term and long-term results revealed no significant difference for the Constant Score (p = 0.348) and the CC distance (p = 0.974). Conclusion. The clinical outcome of MINAR is good to excellent after long-term follow-up and no significant differences were found compared to short-term results. We therefore suggest this is a reliable technique for surgical treatment of high-grade AC joint dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):918–924

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of locking plate fixation, with and without an associated fibular strut allograft, for the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. Patients and Methods. We undertook a retrospective comparison of two methods of fixation, using a locking plate without an associated fibular strut allograft (LP group) and with a fibular allograft (FA group) for the treatment of these fractures. The outcome was assessed for 52 patients in the LP group and 45 in the FA group, with a mean age of 74.3 years (52 to 89), at a mean follow-up of 14.2 months (12 to 19). The clinical results were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the range of movement. Radiological results were evaluated using the neck-shaft angle (NSA) and humeral head height (HHH). Results. The mean forward elevation in the LP and FA groups was 125.3° (. sd. 21.4) and 148.9° (. sd. 19.8), respectively (p = 0.042), while other clinical factors showed no statistically significant differences between the groups. The changes in NSA and HHH immediately after the operation and at final follow-up were significantly better in the FA group than in the LP group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.021, respectively). Conclusion. For comminuted proximal humeral fractures in osteoporotic patients, locking plate fixation with a fibular strut allograft shows satisfactory short-term results with respect to humeral head support and maintenance of reduction, and may reduce the incidence of complications associated with fixation using a locking plate alone. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:260–265

Purpose. Exeter stem was introduced to Japanese market at 1996. Since then, owing to its excellent clinical results, the number of the stem used has been increased year by year and more than 2000 stems have been implanted during the year 2009. The present study aims to prove its efficacy for Japanese patients by evaluating short term results of four major dedicated hip centers. Method. We present the short-term multi-center results of primary THA with Exeter stem combined with modern cementing technique in 881 patients (1000 hips). The average age of the patients at operation was 62.3years (ranging 23 to 89 years). Mean postoperative follow up period was 4.0 (ranging 2 to 9) years. Results. Intraoperative complications such as femoral fracture were observed in 6 hips. Postoperative cementing grade using Barrack's classification was judged as A for 735 hips, as B for 246 hips, and as C for 4 hips, respectively. Twenty-four patients died with unrelated disease and 52 patients were lost during follow-up period. Follow-up ratio was 94.8%. Thirty postoperative complications which include 9 infections, 14 dislocations, 5 deep vein thrombosis, and 2 sciatic nerve palsies were observed. Symptomatic pulmonary embolization or femoral fracture was not observed. Re-operations for infection and dislocation were performed for 8 and 6 hips, respectively. At the final follow-up, no radiolucent line at bone-cement interface was observed. Cortical hypertrophy was observed in 9.6% at Gruen zone 2 to 6. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis predicted a rate of survival at 5 years of 100% with radiolucent line at bone-cement interface of the femur as the endpoint, and of 98.8% when re-operation for any reason was used. Conclusion. The present study revealed excellent short-term result was obtained using Exeter stem combined with modern cementing technique for primary THAs in Japan

Background. In elderly patients with complex proximal humerus fractures and osteoporotic bone reconstruction is not always possible. Although hemiarthroplasty is an alternative, non-union or tuberosity migration can lead to inferior functional results. Implantation of a Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) seems to be an interesting alternative. In the present study we retrospectively analyzed the short-term results of RTSA for complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Methods. From 31.10.2005 to 20.07.2010 RTSA was performed in 29 patients (average age 80 years [67;90], 25 women, 4 man) with subcapital, three- or four-part fracture of the proximal humerus as a primary treatment. All procedures were performed using the Anatomical Inverse Shoulder (Zimmer) with fracture stem. A deltopectoral approach was used in every case with reattachment of the tuberosities. Pain, range of motion, subjected shoulder value (SSV) as well as the Constant score (CS) were used to evaluate shoulder function. Implant positioning and signs of loosening were analyzed on standard x-rays. Results. Included were 23 patients with a minimal follow-up of 12 month. The average follow-up was 17 month (12 month to 5 years). The mean SSV was 81% [40;100]. The absolute CS averaged 67 points [34;84] and the relative CS 97% [52;139]. The mean pain score (VAS) was 13.7 of 15, the mean activity score 18.4 of 20, the mean mobility score 28.6 of 40 and the mean strength score 5.1 of 25. The mean active anterior elevation was 130° [80;160], the mean active abduction 128° [80;170] and the mean active external rotation in 0° abduction 21° [-30;70]. All patients reached the same activity level as before surgery and could return to independent living. The results after 12 month were already comparable to those after 24 month (10 patients). Radiographically no signs of loosening were detected. There was a total of 3 complications and reoperations, two due to a hematoma and one because of a periprosthetic fracture. Conclusions. In elderly patients with complex proximal humerus fractures and osteoporotic bone RTSA seems to be a very satisfactory procedure. The short-term clinical results are excellent and predictable with a rapid postoperative recovery of daily comfort. The complication rate is low and acceptable

Introduction. The legion knee revision system was designed as a follow and improvement to the Genesis II knee system- allowing for a surgeon directed femoral rotation as opposed to the in-built femoral rotation in the previous system. This is a prospective review of consecutive patients who underwent knee revision surgery using the legion knee system. Methods. Clinical and functional assessments were carried out preoperatively, one year and 2 years post op. Radiographic evaluation was done at 1 and 2years follow up. Standard knee scoring systems (American Knee Scores-AKS, and Oxford score were used for the clinical and functional evaluation of these patients. The WOMAC score was also used to assess for pain, stiffness and social function in these patients. The radiographic assessment included review of standing AP, lateral and skyline views. Figgie's method was used to measure the joint line reproduction. A difference of 5 mm (pre = op/post-op) was deemed satisfactory. Results. Seventy-five consecutive patients underwent revision knee system- 38 male: 34 females with a mean age of 71.2 (50–87 yrs.). Mean BMI-26.03, (Range 11–50). We had a 2-year follow up for 32 patients Surgery was carried out at a single centre and performed by members of the Bristol knee group. Indications for surgery in these patients- were aseptic loosening (38), instability (15), pain and stiffness (7), polyarthropathy (2), ligament laxity (3), peri-prosthetic fractures (3), and impingement (4). The mean American Knee scores, and WOMAC scores at, 1 year and 2 years follow up showed significant improvements in pain and function. It was also noted that the mean oxford knee score improved from 14/48 pre-operatively to 34/48 at 2yrs. Radiographic assessment showed a mean AP coronal femoral angle of 95.3 degrees (range 89.6–99.9 degrees), coronal tibial angle of 90.1 degrees (Range 88–92 degrees). The mean sagittal femoral and tibial angles were 88.4 and 90.4 degrees respectively. Mean Kappa value for the inter observer reliability for the radiographic assessment was 0.50 showing agreement, with standard error measurement of 1.2. The joint line was reproduced in all cases. Discussion. The short-term results with the Legion Knee revision system showed significant improvement in functional and pain scores in these patients irrespective of their indications for revision surgery. Overall the legion system has showed good outcome scores that match or beat published series on revisions. It also showed a good ability to restore joint line. Ongoing work needed to refine indications and realistic outcomes for different diagnoses

Aims

No randomized comparative study has compared the extensile lateral approach (ELA) and sinus tarsi approach (STA) for Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures. This randomized comparative study was conducted to confirm whether the STA was prone to fewer wound complications than the ELA.

Aims

The best method of treating unstable pelvic fractures that involve the obturator ring is still a matter for debate. This study compared three methods of treatment: nonoperative, isolated posterior fixation and combined anteroposterior stabilization.

Fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) joints are frequently overlooked or misdiagnosed at initial presentation. This is a comparative cohort study over a period of five years comparing primary open reduction and internal fixation in 22 patients (23 feet) with secondary corrective arthrodesis in 22 patients (22 feet) who presented with painful malunion at a mean of 22 months (1.5 to 45) after injury. In the first group primary treatment by open reduction and internal fixation for eight weeks with Kirschner-wires or screws was undertaken, in the second group treatment was by secondary corrective arthrodesis. There was one deep infection in the first group. In the delayed group there was one complete and one partial nonunion.

In each group 20 patients were available for follow-up at a mean of 36 months (24 to 89) after operation. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score was 81.4 (62 to 100) after primary treatment and 71.8 (35 to 88) after corrective arthrodesis (t-test; p = 0.031).

We conclude that primary treatment by open reduction and internal fixation of tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocations leads to improved functional results, earlier return to work and greater patient satisfaction than secondary corrective arthrodesis, which remains a useful salvage procedure providing significant relief of pain and improvement in function.

Four men who presented with chronic dislocation of the radial head and nonunion or malunion of the ulna were reviewed after open reduction of the radial head and internal fixation of the ulna in attempted overcorrection. Their mean age was 37 years (28 to 46) and the mean interval between injury and reconstruction was nine months (4 to 18).

The mean follow-up was 24 months (15 to 36). One patient who had undergone secondary excision of the radial head was also followed up for comparison.

The three patients who had followed the treatment protocol had nearly normal flexion, extension and supination and only very occasional pain. All had considerable loss of pronation which did not affect patient satisfaction.

Preservation of the radial head in chronic adult Monteggia fractures appears to be a promising mode of treatment.