The 2021 Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry report indicated that total shoulder replacement using both mid head (TMH) length humeral components and reverse arthroplasty (RTSA) had a lower revision rate than stemmed humeral components in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) - for all prosthesis types and diagnoses. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of component variables in the various primary total arthroplasty alternatives for osteoarthritis in the shoulder. Data from a large national arthroplasty registry were analysed for the period April 2004 to December 2020. The study population included all primary aTSA, RTSA, and TMH shoulder arthroplasty procedures undertaken for osteoarthritis (OA) using either cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) or non-cross-linked polyethylene (non XLPE). Due to the previously documented and reported higher revision rate compared to other anatomical total shoulder replacement options, those using a cementless metal backed glenoid components were excluded. The rate of revision was determined by Kaplan-Meir estimates, with comparisons by Cox proportional hazard models. Reasons for revision were also assessed. For a primary diagnosis of OA, aTSA with a cemented XLPE glenoid component had the lowest revision rate with a 12-year cumulative revision rate of 4.7%, compared to aTSA with cemented non-XLPE glenoid component of 8.7%, and RTSA of 6.8%. The revision rate for TMH was lower than aTSA with cemented non-XLPE, but was similar to the other implants at the same length of follow-up. The reason for revision for cemented aTSR was most commonly component loosening, not rotator cuff deficiency. Long stem humeral components matched with XLPE in aTSA achieve a lower revision rate compared to shorter stems, long stems with conventional polyethylene, and RTSA when used to treat shoulder OA. In all these cohorts, loosening, not rotator cuff failure was the most common diagnosis for revision

Shoulder replacement surgery is a well-established orthopaedic procedure designed to significantly enhance patients’ quality of life. However, the prevailing preoperative admission practices within our tertiary shoulder surgery unit involve a two-stage group and save testing process, necessitating an admission on the evening before surgery. This protocol may unnecessarily prolong hospital stays without yielding substantial clinical benefits. The principal aim of our study is to assess the necessity of conducting two preoperative group and save blood tests and to evaluate the requirement for blood transfusions in shoulder arthroplasty surgeries. A secondary objective is to reduce hospital stay durations and the associated admission costs for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. We conducted a retrospective observational study covering the period from 1st January 2023 to 31st August 2023, collecting data from shoulder arthroplasty procedures across three hospitals within the Aneurin Bevan University Health Board. Our analysis included 21 total shoulder replacement cases and 13 reverse shoulder replacement cases. Notably, none of the patients required postoperative blood transfusions. The mean haemoglobin drop observed was 14 g/L for total shoulder replacements and 15 g/L for reverse shoulder replacements. The mean elective admission duration was 2.4 nights for total shoulder replacements and 2 nights for reverse shoulder replacements. Our data indicated that hospital stays were extended by one night primarily due to the preoperative group and save blood tests. In light of these findings, we propose a more streamlined admission process for elective shoulder replacement surgery, eliminating the need for the evening-before-surgery group and save testing. Hospital admissions in these units incur a cost of approximately £500 per night, while the group and save blood tests cost around £30 each. This revised admission procedure is expected to optimise the use of healthcare resources and improve patient satisfaction without compromising clinical care

Aims. A number of methods have been described to remove a well-fixed humeral implant as part of revision shoulder arthroplasty. These include the use of cortical windows and humeral osteotomies. The router bit extraction technique uses a high-speed router bit to disrupt the bone-implant interface. The implant is then struck in a retrograde fashion with a square-tip impactor and mallet. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and frequency of the different techniques needed for the removal of a well-fixed humeral stem in revision shoulder arthroplasty. Patients and Methods. Between 2010 and 2018, 288 revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures requiring removal of a well-fixed humeral component were carried out at a tertiary referral centre by a single surgeon. The patient demographics, indications for surgery, and method of extraction were collected. Results. Of the 288 revisions, 284 humeral stems (98.6%) were removed using the router bit extraction technique alone. Four humeral stems (1.39%) required an additional cortical window. Humeral osteotomy was not necessary in any procedure. Most of the humeral stems removed (78.8%) were cementless. Of the four humeral stems that required a cortical window, three involved removal of a hemiarthroplasty. Two were cemented and two were cementless. Conclusion. The router bit extraction technique removed a well-fixed humeral component in a very high proportion of patients (98.6%). This method allows surgeons to avoid more invasive approaches involving a cortical window or humeral osteotomy, and their associated complications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1280–1284

Introduction and Objective. Postoperative pain control in shoulder surgery is challenging even in arthroscopic procedures. Acute postoperative pain can last up to 48hrs despite using multimodal analgesia. Different techniques have been used to control acute pain following shoulder surgery. The most common technique currently used in shoulder surgery at the elective orthopaedic centre in Leeds is a combination of general anaesthetic (GA) and interscalene block (ISB). ISB maybe very effective, however, carries many risks and potential side effects such as brachial plexus injury and paralysis of the vagus and laryngeal recurrent nerves as well as cervical sympathetic nerve and pneumothorax. ISB can also be associated with higher incidence of neurological deficit compared to other peripheral nerve blocks; up to 14% at 10 days in some cases. As such we decided to examine the use of ISB for achieving pain control in our elective unit. Materials and Methods. A prospective consecutive series of 217 patients undergoing shoulder surgery were studied. These were grouped into 10 groups. All procedures were arthroscopic apart from shoulder arthroplasty procedures such as hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder replacements (TSRs). The choice of regional anaesthesia was ISB with GA as standard practice. Visual analogue scores (VAS) at 0hrs, 1hr, 2hrs, 4hrs and 6hrs; and total opiates intake were recorded. A one-way single factor ANOVA was used as preferred statistical analytical method to determine whether there is a difference in VAS scores and total opiates intake amongst the groups. Postoperative analgesics were used for pain relief, although these were not standardised. Results. In total shoulder replacement group, although the RSR group used more morphine on average compared to the ASR group (Mean morphine intake 6.5mg vs 3mg), this was not statistically significant (F<Fcrit; p value= 0.19). When comparing all the arthroplasty groups, the difference in mean morphine intake was also statistically not significant (F<Fcrit; p value=0.24). However, when comparing all 10 groups’ morphine intake there was a statistically significant difference amongst these groups (F>F crit; p value=0.03). Interestingly, there was a statistically significant difference in VAS at 0hrs (F>Fcrit p value=0.01); 1hrs (F>Fcrit; p value=0.00), and at 6hrs (F>Fcrit; p value=0.02) when comparing all 10 groups. Conclusions. ISB is an effective technique in achieving pain control in shoulder surgery; however, there are still variations in analgesic needs amongst groups and the use of alternative techniques should be thus explored. A future prospective study looking at acute pain for a longer period of time after shoulder surgery would explore the effectiveness of ISB in achieving pain control consistent with rehabilitation requirements

Shoulder arthroplasty procedures continue to increase in prevalence and controversy still remains about the optimal method to manage the subscapularis. Scalise et al. performed an analysis of 20 osteotomies and 15 tenotomy procedures, and found the tenotomy group had a higher rate of abnormal subscapularis tendons on ultrasound examination. There was one tendon rupture in the subscapularis tenotomy group and no ruptures in the osteotomy group. Jandhyala et al. retrospectively examined 26 lesser tuberosity osteotomies and 10 subscapularis tenotomies for arthroplasty, and their study demonstrated a significant improvement in the belly press test for the osteotomy group. Lapner et al. performed a randomised controlled trial assigning patients to either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or a subscapularis peel procedure. They evaluated 36 osteotomies and 37 subscapularis peels. The outcomes evaluated were Dynamometer internal rotation strength, the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and in a subsequent paper they evaluated the healing rates and Goutallier grade. Their studies illustrated no difference in the internal rotation strength between groups. Both groups significantly improved WOOS and ASES scores postoperatively, but the difference was not significant between groups. Goutallier grade increased significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Overall, the different approaches have not demonstrated a meaningful clinical difference. Further studies are needed to help understand issues leading to subscapularis complications after arthroplasty

Aims. To report the rate of early revision (within two years) after shoulder arthroplasty and identify any patient, disease or prosthesis factors that may be associated with these early failures. Methods. The AOA National Joint Replacement Registry has recorded 7113 shoulder arthroplasty procedures up to December 2009. Data recorded includes diagnosis, patient demographics and prosthesis details. The main outcome of this analysis was the time to first revision of all primary shoulder arthroplasty recorded by the Registry. The cumulative per cent revision (CPR) of shoulder arthroplasty procedures was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test significance between groups. Results. The CPR (95% CI) at two years for all diagnosis was 5.2 (3.1, 8.7) for hemi-resurfacing arthroplasty, 4.0 (2.9, 5.6) for hemiarthroplasty, 4.1 (3.1, 5.3) for conventional total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and 4.0 (3.0, 5.2) for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (reverse TSA). Neither patient age nor sex were shown to affect the rate of revision for conventional and reverse TSA performed for osteoarthritis. The use of an uncemented conventional TSR performed for osteoarthritis is associated with a higher rate of revision when compared with cemented TSR (HR 4.71 (1.43, 15.45)) and hybrid TSR using a cemented glenoid component (HR 2.48 (1.45, 4.24)). Both the Univers 3D conventional total shoulder replacement prosthesis (adjusted HR 3.8 (1.52, 9.50) p< 0.01) and the SMR/SMR reverse total shoulder replacement (adjusted HR 2.0 (1.15, 3.28) p=0.01) were prosthesis identified by the Registry as having a significantly higher rate of revision compared to all other prosthesis in the same class. Conclusions. The Registry has identified an increased early rate of revision with the use of uncemented convention TSR. Two types of prosthesis were identified as having a higher than anticipated rate of revision compared to all other prosthesis in the same class

The number of shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States continues to rise. Currently, the number of procedures performed per year ranges from 55,000–80,000 and is expected to increase more than 300% in the coming years. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications associated with arthroplasty surgery, leading to poor outcomes, increased cost, and technically difficult revision surgery. The incidence of infection following primary shoulder arthroplasty has been reported between 0.7% and 4%, representing 2.9–4.6% of all complications. Prosthetic shoulder joint infections are unlike prosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. Shoulder PJIs are primarily indolent in nature and difficult to diagnose using traditional methods that have been shown to be accurate for periprosthetic infections of the hip and knee. The majority of infected revision shoulder arthroplasties are associated with growth of Propionibacterium acnes (P. Acnes). This slow-growing, anaerobic organism requires longer than normal incubation times for culture (7–21 days), and typically demonstrates a subtle, non-specific clinical presentation that can make the presence of infection difficult to identify. In the reported literature, P. Acnes accounts for about 70% of cases with positive cultures associated with revision for treatment of a painful shoulder arthroplasty and due to the bacteria's slow growing nature and virulence profile, the rate of infection following shoulder arthroplasty may often be underestimated. A more recent and promising tool for evaluation of periprosthetic infection has been analysis of synovial fluid. Synovial fluid biomarkers have been identified as part of the innate response to pathogens, and include pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-microbial peptides, and marker levels have shown promise for improved diagnostic efficacy in hip and knee PJI. Currently, no highly predictive clinical test for diagnosis of PJI in the shoulder exists, however, several of these synovial biomarkers have recently been analyzed for their diagnostic capacity in the setting of periprosthetic shoulder infection. Synovial fluid cytokine analysis shows the potential to improve diagnosis of infection in revision shoulder arthroplasty. This information can help to guide decision-making in the management of PJI of the shoulder, including the decision to perform a single- vs. two-stage revision surgery, and the need for post-operative antibiotics following an unexpected positive culture result after revision surgery. However, there are still challenges to broader use of these synovial biomarkers. Synovial α-defensin (Synovsure, CD Diagnostic) is the only marker currently available as a commercial test, and no point-of-care test is currently available for any of the biomarkers to allow for intraoperative decision-making. While a preoperative synovial aspirate is possible to send for α-defensin analysis currently, with results back in approximately 24 hours, dry fluid aspirations are frequent in the shoulder because of the predominance of indolent pathogens and may limit utility of the test. In summary, indolent infection associated with P. acnes is a common cause for the painful total shoulder arthroplasty. Pre-operative diagnosis of infection is difficult as a result of the poor diagnostic accuracy of traditional methods of testing. Synovial biomarker testing may ultimately improve our ability to more accurately diagnosis and treat prosthetic shoulder joint infections

Aims

The optimal choice of management for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) has been increasingly discussed in the literature, and this work aimed to answer the following questions: 1) what are the incidence rates of PHF in the geriatric population in the USA; 2) what is the mortality rate after PHF in the elderly population, specifically for distinct treatment procedures; and 3) what factors influence the mortality rate?

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of common medical comorbidities on the reimbursements of different shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Methods. We conducted a retrospective query of a private payer insurance claims database of prospectively collected data (PealDiver). Our search included the Current Procedural Terminology Codes (CPT) and International Classification of Disease (ICD) ninth edition codes for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA), Hemiarthroplasty (HA) and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA). Medical comorbidities were also searched for through ICD codes. The comorbidities selected for analysis were obesity, morbid obesity, hypertension, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cirrhosis, depression and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (excluding end stage renal disease). The study period comprised claims from 2010 to 2014. The reimbursement charges of the day of surgery, 90-day global period and 90-day period excluding the initial surgical day of each comorbidity were analyzed and compared. Statistical analysis was conducted trough analysis of variance (ANOVA) when the data was normally distributed or through Kruskal-Wallis comparison when it was not. An alpha value of less than 0.05 was deemed as significant. Results. Comorbidities did not have a significant effect on same day reimbursements (Figure 1), but instead caused a significant effect on the 90-day global period reimbursements in the TSA and RSA cohorts (figure 2). For TSA and RSA the highest reimbursed patients at the 90-day period following surgery were the ones that had a diagnosis of Hepatitis C followed by atrial fibrillation and later COPD. For HA the same was true in the following order: Hepatitis C, Cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation (Figure 3). Conclusion. Shoulder arthroplasty reimbursements are significantly affected by comorbidities at time intervals following the initial surgical day. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

INTRODUCTION. Shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is an effective procedure for managing patients with shoulder pain secondary to degenerative joint disease or end stage arthritis that has failed conservative treatment. Insurance status has been shown to be an indicator of patient morbidity and mortality. The objective of the current study is to evaluate the effect of patient insurance status on outcomes following shoulder replacement surgery. METHODS. Data was obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2004 and 2011. Analysis included patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty procedures determined by ICD-9 procedure codes. Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed and stratified by insurance type. The primary outcome was medical and surgical complications occurring during the same hospitalization with secondary analysis of mortality. Pearson's chi¬squared test and multivariate regression were performed. RESULTS. A data inquiry identified 103,290 patients (68,578 Medicare, 27,159 private insurance, 3,544 Medicaid/uninsured, 4,009 Other) undergoing partial, total and reverse total shoulder replacements. The total number of complications was 17,810 (17.24%), and the top three complications included acute cardiac events (8,165), urinary tract infections (3,154), and pneumonia (1,635). The highest complication rate was observed in the Medicare population (20.3%), followed by the Medicaid/uninsured (16.9%), other (11.1%), and the privately-insured cohort (10.5%). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that having Medicare insurance, white race, increasing age, higher comorbidity, and urgent or emergent admissions was associated with medical complications. Black patients, increasing age and comorbities was associated with surgical complications. Overall mortality was 0.20% and was more common in total shoulder arthroplasty and surgeries done on emergent or urgent admissions. DISCUSSION. This data reveals that patients with Medicare, Medicaid or no insurance were more likely to have medical complications, most commonly cardiac complications, UTIs and pneumonia. Primary insurance payer status can be considered as an independent risk factor during preoperative risk stratification and planning

The June 2024 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Reverse versus anatomical total shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis? A UK national picture; Acute rehabilitation following traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (ARTISAN): pragmatic, multicentre, randomized controlled trial; acid for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; Metal or ceramic humeral head total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of data from the National Joint Registry; Platelet-rich plasma has better results for long-term functional improvement and pain relief for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; Quantitative fatty infiltration and 3D muscle volume after nonoperative treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective MRI study of 79 patients; Locking plates for non-osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in the long term; A systematic review of the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.

While the definition of “stiffness” after shoulder arthroplasty remains controversial, loss of range of motion in the post-arthroplasty setting can be a disabling functional complication. Fortunately, the incidence of post-operative loss of both active and passive range of motion is relatively less common following shoulder replacement procedures. Certain pre-operative diagnoses (proximal humeral fracture, capsulorraphy arthropathy, revision arthroplasty) are associated with post-operative soft tissue contractures. Certain medical comorbidities (diabetes, inflammatory arthropathy) are associated with periarticular capsular adhesions at the intracellular level. Management of the “stiff” shoulder arthroplasty must account for several confounding variables: . Appropriateness of diagnosis leading to arthroplasty. Humeral and glenoid implants (size, version, hemi vs TSA vs RSA). Bone variables (fracture, bone loss/erosion). Soft tissue variables (rotator cuff, glenohumeral capsule). Patient comorbidities. Techniques for management include soft tissue contracture release (manipulation, arthroscopic, open) and component revision

Introduction. Optimal orthopaedic implant placement is a major contributing factor to the long term success of all common joint arthroplasty procedures. Devices such as 3D printed bespoke guides and orthopaedic robots are extensively described in the literature and have been shown to enhance prosthesis placement accuracy. These technologies have significant drawbacks such as logistical and temporal inefficiency, high cost, cumbersome nature and difficult theatre integration. A radically new disruptive technology for the rapid intraoperative production of patient specific instrumentation that obviates all disadvantages of current technologies is presented. Methods. An ex-vivo validation and accuracy study was carried out using the example of placing the glenoid component in a shoulder arthroplasty procedure. The technology comprises a re-usable table side machine, bespoke software and a disposable element comprising a region of standard geometry and a body of mouldable material. Anatomical data from 10 human scapulae CT scans was collected and in each case the optimal glenoid guidewire position was digitally planned and recorded. The glenoids were isolated and concurrently 3D printed. In our control group, guide wires were manually inserted into 1 of each pair of unique glenoid models according to a surgeon's interpretation of the optimal position from the anatomy. The same surgeon used the guidance system and associated method to insert a guide wire into the second glenoid model of the pair. Achieved accuracy compared to the pre-operative bespoke plan was measured in all glenoids in both the conventional group and the guided group. Results. The technology was successfully able to intraoperatively produce sterile, patient specific guides according to a pre-operative plan in 5 minutes including device set up and planning, at a minimal cost. In the manual insertion group, average accuracy achieved was 6.8° and 1.58mm with respect to the plan compared to the guided group where an average of 0.74mm and 1.72 ° was achieved

Introduction. The impact of prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery on outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of prior shoulder surgery on patients undergoing TSA and RSA compared to patients without prior shoulder surgery. The hypothesis was that patients undergoing arthroplasty after prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery would have inferior outcomes with higher complication rates compared to patients undergoing arthroplasty without having undergone prior surgery. Materials and Methods. Seven-hundred fifteen consecutive patients undergoing TSA or RSA between 1/2010 and 5/2014 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were prospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Functional Score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) outcomes assessments, as well as with physical examination including range of motion assessments. Outcomes in patients undergoing prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery (PS group) were compared to those in patients without history of prior surgery (NPS group). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way univariate and multivariate analysis of covariates (ANCOVA/MANCOVA) adjusting for age, Whitney-Mann U tests, and Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, with P<0.05 considered significant. Results. Of the 715 patients, 506 (263 TSA, 243 RSA) were available for analysis (71% follow-up rate). A total of 144 patients (29%) underwent an average of 2.0±1.1 ipsilateral shoulder surgeries, prior to arthroplasty while 362 (71%) did not undergo prior surgery. In the PS Group, rotator cuff repair (RCR) accounted for 67% of the prior surgeries. PS group patients were significantly younger at the time of arthroplasty compared to the NPS group (61.6±10.2 vs. 68.2±8.6 years, P=0.035). At an average follow-up of 42.8±16.4 months, both groups had significant improvements in ASES, SST, and VAS outcomes scores and range of motion values (P<0.05 for all). All outcomes scores in the PS group were significantly lower compared to the NPS group (P≤0.005 for all). Within the PS group, there were no significant differences detected in outcome scores or magnitudes of change in outcomes between patients undergoing RCR or any other procedure. There were 41 total complications (8.1%) and 17 total reoperations (3.4%) following shoulder arthroplasty, and there was a significantly higher rate of complications in the PS Group (18.1%) versus the NPS Group (4.1%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the PS and NPS groups with respect to the number of postoperative infections (P=0.679), reoperations (P=0.553), or transfusions (P=0.220). Conclusions. While patients who have undergone prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery derive benefit from shoulder arthroplasty, these patients are significantly younger, have significantly more complications, and their magnitude of improvement and final scores are significantly lower than patients without prior surgery. This information can be used to counsel this challenging patient population on expected outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty procedures

Shoulder arthroplasty procedures continue to increase in prevalence, and controversy still remains about the optimal method to manage the subscapularis. Scalise et al. performed an analysis of 20 osteotomies and 15 tenotomy procedures, and found the tenotomy group had a higher rate of abnormal subscapularis tendons on ultrasound examination. There was one tendon rupture in the subscapularis tenotomy group and no ruptures in the osteotomy group. Jandhyala et al. retrospectively examined 26 lesser tuberosity osteotomies and 10 subscapularis tenotomies for arthroplasty, and their study demonstrated a significant improvement in the belly press test for the osteotomy group. Lapner et al. performed a randomised controlled trial assigning patient to either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or a subscapularis peel procedure. They evaluated 36 osteotomies and 37 subscapularis peels. The outcomes evaluated were Dynamometer internal rotation strength, the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and in a subsequent paper they evaluated the healing rates and Goutallier grade. Their studies illustrated no difference in the internal rotation strength between groups. Both groups significantly improved WOOS and ASES scores post-operatively, but the difference was not significant between groups. Goutallier grade increased significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Overall, the different approaches have not demonstrated a meaningful clinical difference. Further studies are needed to help understand issues leading to subscapularis complications after arthroplasty

Introduction In view of the legal claim for quality assurance in Germany, complete documentation and a professional evaluation of shoulder arthroplasty procedures are indispensable. Under the auspices of German AO International (DAOI), the German Society of Orthopeadics and Orthopeadic Surgery (DGOOC), the German Society of Trauma Surgery (DGU) and the German Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (DVSE), and in collaboration with the MEM Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, the nationwide online Shoulder Arthroplasty Register was implemented. Register setup The German Shoulder Arthroplasty Register consists of three online questionnaires, covering surgery for primary shoulder arthroplasty, follow-up examination, and revision surgery. Registered surgeons can access the questionnaires via Internet. For easier administration in clinics, paper copies of the questionnaires are also available. Online validation procedures check all entered data for completeness and plausibility. After passing these checks, data are sent to the central database. The centralization of the data collection is crucial for data unification and validity. Advantages Participating surgeons benefit from descriptive real-time statistics of their patients, and constant benchmarking of their performance in comparison with the whole register is possible. With the documentation of complications, implant failures and revision surgery, quality assurance reports can be easily produced. Furthermore, X-ray images of special cases can be uploaded. Perspective The German Shoulder Arthroplasty Register was launched in January 2006 and documentation is ongoing. First scientific results will be available in 2007

The aim of this study was to assess the results of bone ingrowth into the glenoid component of one design of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) in which hydroxyapatite (HA) coating of the glenoid baseplate was introduced since 1997. Glenoid loosening is one of the most important complications of both cemented and uncemented TSA. Between May 1993 and April 1997 over 140 uncemented, porous coated, metal backed glenoid component were used in our Unit. By 1997 it had become clear that a significant number of these glenoid components had developed mechanical loosening and some required revision. We therefore started using an HA coated glenoid component for our TSAs from April 1997. One hundred and seventy-four shoulder arthroplasty procedures were performed between April 1997 and October 1999 of which 37 were TSAs using the HA coated uncemented glenoid. The indications included osteoarthritis (22), rheumatoid arthritis (nine), revision TSA (three), avascular necrosis (two) and cuff arthropathy with cuff reconstruction (one). The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The X rays were evaluated using the MLS (Migration, Lucent lines, Screw problems) system, which had been developed and reported previously. This system of evaluation has been shown to be reproducible for assessment of glenoid fixation. There was one case in which the glenoid liner became displaced and had to be replaced. Our early results at a mean FU of approximately 2 years show an improved radiological fixation compared with those glenoids inserted without HA

Purpose: Osteochondral allograft transplantation for the treatment of osseous defects to the humeral head has recently grown in popularity. Because only a portion of the articulating surface of the humeral head is replaced, conformity of the allograft to the native surface is imperative to restore the natural geometry of the joint. To achieve proper conformity, it is essential that the curvature of the humeral head of the allograft tissue match that of the native tissue. Curvature determination is also important for shoulder replacement procedures. Curvature of the humeral head is difficult to directly measure in allograft specimens. As a result, predictive measurements, such as the maximum length of the humerus are used to predict this curvature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of various anthropometric measurements for predicting humeral head curvature. We hypothesized that the maximum length of the humerus would be the most predictive of humeral curvature. Method: 60 (28 female, 32 male) cadaveric humeri were obtained from the Hamann-Todd Human Osteological Collection. Specimens ranged from 20 to 35 years of age at the time of death (27.9 ± 4.5, mean ± SD). Specimens from this collection include height and weight as collected at the time of death. All specimens were scanned with a 3-dimensional laser scanner (NextEngine, Santa Monica, California, USA). This scanner has been shown to be accurate to within 0.005 inches. Linear measurements (maximum humeral length, epicondylar breadth) were made according to the recording standards for skeletal remains. Both measurements were made by choosing points on the 3-dimensional scan, rather than the traditional osteometric board. Humeral head curvature was determined by a custom computational code to fit a sphere to the articulating surface of the humerus. Data analysis was performed in Minitab (version 13, State College, PA, USA). A linear regression was performed for each predictive measurement. A stepwise linear regression with forward and backward substitution was performed for the most predictive variables from the initial linear regression. Results: The most predictive factors (R^2 > 0.5) were epicondylar breadth, height, maximum humeral length, and gender. Based on the linear regression coefficients, these four factors (all normalized) were included in a forward and backward stepwise regression (alpha to enter and remove = 0.15). The resulting equation (shown below) had an R^2 values of 0.807. Humeral Diameter = 0.894 + 0.048*(epicondylar breadth) + 0.043*height – 0.020*gender. Conclusion: Of the predicted measurements evaluated, patient height, epicondylar breadth, and gender were most correlated with humeral head curvature. Including these three factors in a linear regression model increased the R2 value to 0.807. If only a single measurement can be used to size the humeral curvature, patient height will give approximately the same accuracy as epicondylar breadth, and can more easily be obtained

Aims

To investigate the impact of the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices on patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) following shoulder arthroplasty.