Background. Since 1991 to 2008 approximately 800,000 Exeter stems have been sold worldwide with 80 reported cases of fracture (neck or stem). This study aimed to determine factors predisposing to fracture. Method. Clinical, surgical, radiological and retrieval data was collated from Stryker Benoist-Girard and Exeter research databases. Risk factors associated with fracture were categorised to patient related (weight and activity levels), surgical related (poor medial support, component size, placement) and implant related (+ head). Results. Data was available on 60 patients (28 stem, 32 neck fractures). Number of fractures per annum increased in proportion with sales. Mean patient age at fracture was similar for both neck and stem fractures (69yrs, 53–84; 67yrs, 30–89. p=0.56). 77% neck and 52% stem fractures occurred in males. Mean weight was 110kg (82–140) in neck and 91kg (70–126) in stem fractures with 68% neck and 38% stem fractures either obese or morbidly obese. Mean time to fracture was 78mths (36–144) for neck and 76 mths (2–155) for stem fractures. 76% of neck fractures occurred in stem sizes 44#2, 44#3 and 44¢4. Stem fractures occurred more commonly (85%) in the smaller sizes (35.5 to 44#1). A + head was used in 67% neck and 14% of stem fractures. Neck fractures were most commonly associated with patient (increased weight and activity) and implant related (use of a + head) factors. Stem fractures were most commonly associated with correctable surgical related causes predominantly secondary to stem undersizing or inadequate medial support. Conclusion. Careful pre operative planning and templating is essential to identify those patients with pre-existing identifiable patient (weight, activity levels) and anatomical (proximal femoral canal morphology and offset) risk factors, to ensure appropriate stem selection and size (which may require a custom made implant) and meticulous placement and cementing technique in order to maximise fracture prevention

Fully constrained liners are used to treat recurrent dislocations or patients at high risk after total hip replacements. However, they can cause significant morbidities including recurrent dislocations, infections, aseptic loosening and fractures. We examine long term results of 111 patients with tripolar constrained components to assess their redislocation and failure rate. The purpose of this study was to assess survivorship, complications and functional outcomes at a minimum 10 years after the constrained tripolar liners used in our institute. We retrospectively identified 111 patients who had 113 revision tripolar constrained liners between 1998 and 2008. Eighty-nine were revised due to recurrent dislocations, 11 for pseudotumor with dysfunctional abductors, and 13 for periprosthetic infection with loss of soft tissue stabilizers. All patients had revision hip arthroplasty before the constrained liner was used: 13 after the first revision, 17 after the second, 38 after the third, and 45 had more than 3 revisions. We extracted demographics, implant data, rate of dislocations and incidence of other complications. Kaplan Meier curves were used to assess dislocation and failure for any reason. WOMAC was used to assess quality of life. At 10 years, the survival free of dislocation was 95.6% (95%CI 90- 98), and at 20 years to 90.6% (95% CI 81- 95.5). Eight patients (7.1%) had dislocations of their constrained liners: 1 patient had simultaneous periprosthetic infection identified at the time of open reduction, and 1 patient sustained stem fracture 3 months prior to the liner dislocation. At 10 years, the survival to any further surgery was 89.4% (95% CI 82–93.8), and at 20 years, this was 82.5 (95% CI 71.9–89.3). Five patients (4.4%) had deep infection: 4 of these had excision arthroplasty due to failure to control infection, while 1 patient was treated successfully with debridement, exchange of mobile components and intravenous antibiotics. Two patients (1.8%) had dissociated rings that required change of liner, ring and head. Two patients (1.8%) had periprosthetic femoral fractures that were treated by revision stems and exchange of constrained liners. The mean WOMAC functional and pain scores were 66.2 and 75.9 of 100, respectively. Constrained tripolar liners in our institute provided favourable results in the long term for recurrent dislocation hip arthroplasty with dysfunctional hip stabilizers. Infection in these patients can prove to be difficult to treat due to their poor soft tissue conditions from repeated surgeries. Comparing long terms results from other types of constrained liners is essential to evaluate these salvage liners

Introduction. Osteosynthesis to conserve femoral head following neck of femur (NOF) fractures has reported failure rates of 36 to 47% at 2 years. However, the long-term outcomes of THAs performed for failed osteosynthesis is yet to be elucidated. This study aims to report on long term outcome of primary THAs post failed osteosynthesis for NOF fracture. Methods. Consecutive patients with THA for failed NOF osteosynthesis managed by a single unit between January 1974 and December 2009 were included. Clinical and radiological outcomes of all 72 patients were analysed. Patients with minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. Those with less than 5 years of follow-up were reviewed for failures. Results. Mean age at the time of THA was 56. (range − 18–79). Mean follow-up was 12.9 years (range − 5 to 35.5). All patients had cemented THA. The major late complications included stem loosening in 4, stem fracture - 1, cup loosening - 7, deep infection − 3 and dislocations in 4. Thirteen (18.1%) patients had revisions. Cumulative survival rate is 80.3% (CI: 91.6–69.1) at 10 years. Conclusion. The outcomes for patients with THA for failed osteosynthesis post NOF fracture is worse in comparison with reported revision rates of THA for acute NOF fracture. The risks of poorer outcomes following salvage THA and morbidity of failed osteosynthesis need to be factored in for NOF fracture management

Background. Well-fixed cementless stems are sometimes needed to be extracted in patients with complications including periprosthetic infection, stem-neck breakage or trunnionosis. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcome in patients undergoing re-implantation surgery following removal of a well-fixed porous-coated cementless stem by the femoral longitudinal split (FLS) procedure(Fig.1, Fig.2). Methods. We conducted a retrospective study and radiographic review of 16 patients who had undergone re-implantation following the FLS procedure to remove a well-fixed stem due to periprosthetic infection, stem-neck breakage or trunnionosis. The study group consisted of 2 men and 14women with an average age of 68.4 years. Mean follow-up was 33.1± 25.0 months. Operation time, intraoperative bleeding, complications, causes of re-operation and clinical score were evaluated and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the longevity of the stem. Results. The average operation time was 272±63 minutes and intraoperative bleeding was 420±170 ml. Although postoperative dislocation occurred in 5 hips and sinking of the stem was found in 3 hips after surgery, no progression of the stem sinking was observed and the clinical JOA and JHEQ scores were both improved after re-implantation surgery. Re-implantation surgery with Zweymüller-type stems, which are shorter than those removed, revealed evidence of osseointegration of the stem without femoral fracture. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of stem revision for any reason as the end point revealed 70.3% survival at 9 years (Fig.3). Conclusion. The FLS procedure is expected to confer successful clinical results without loosening of the stem, following safe extraction of well-fixed porous-coated cementless stems without fracture and will allow re-implantation with shorter cementless stems than those removed. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Total hip arthroplasty has become one of the most successful orthopaedic procedures with long-term survival rate. An ever-increasing acceptance of the potential longevity of THA systems has contributed to an increasing incidence of THA in younger and more active patients. Nowadays, especially in younger patients, cementless THA is the favored method worldwide. Since the first cementless THA in late 1970s, many implant designs and modifications have been made. Despite excellent long-term results for traditional straight cementless stems, periprosthetic fractures or gluteal insufficiency are still a concern. For instance, as reported in a meta-analysis by Masonis and Bourne, the incidence of gluteal insufficiency after THA varies between 4% and 22%. In contrast, the flattened lateral profile of the SP-CL. ®. anatomical cementless stem can protect the greater trochanter during the use of cancellous bone compressors and can avoid gluteal insufficiency after THA. Another benefit of this stem design is the rotational stability and the natural load transfer due to the anatomical concept. In this context, we report our experiences using the SP-CL. ®. anatomical cementless stem. The study group consists of 1452 THA cases (850 male, 602 female) with an average age of 62 years (range 25–76 years). After a mean follow-up of 20 months, in seven cases (0.5%) a stem exchange was necessitated. The reason for stem revision was periprosthetic fracture in 4 cases (0.3%) and periprosthetic joint infection in three cases (0.2%). In five patients, hip dislocation and in four patients migration of the stem occurred. However, stem exchange was not required in those cases. In conclusion, the SP-CL. ®. anatomical cementless stem has excellent short-term results

Recent analyses of failure mechanisms continue to show aseptic loosening as the predominant mechanism of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Evaluation for aseptic loosening begins with careful assessment of plain films radiographs, however the utility of examining lucent lines under a cemented tibial tray remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to examine the distribution of lucent lines under cemented tibial components on single-series anteroposterior (AP) and lateral plain radiographs and to determine their significance in the prediction of aseptic loosening found during revision TKA surgery. Retrospective chart and radiographic review of all patients that underwent revision TKA between 2001–2014 at a single academic hospital center. Revision TKA for periprosthetic fracture, stem fracture, implant dissociation and periprosthetic joint infection were excluded. The most recent pre-revision surgery AP and lateral knee radiographs were assessed by two fellowship trained adult reconstruction surgeons blinded to patient demographics and intraoperative details. Lucent lines under the tibia tray defined as >2mm were documented according to the new KSS radiographic scoring system. Demographic details and the surgeon's assessment whether the tibia tray was loose intraoperatively were extracted from chart review and the operative note, respectively. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to predict the outcome of aseptic loosening. Between 2001 and 2014, 312 revision TKAs were performed that met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 84 (26.9%) had intraoperative loose tibia trays. We observed a significantly increased risk of aseptic tibia loosening among older patients at time of surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.02, 1.08). Posterior stabilised primary TKA components conferred a significantly decreased risk of aseptic tibia loosening (OR 0.36, 95% 0.21, 0.60). On an AP radiograph, after adjustment for other zones, the presence of a lucent line in zone 1, 2 or 3 were all significantly associated with tibia loosening, OR 7.35, 8.69 and 22.26 (p<0.0001) respectively. On a lateral radiograph, after adjustment for other zones, the presence of a lucent line in zone 1, 2 or 3 were all significantly associated with tibia loosening, OR 12.89, 18.03, and 11.63 (p<0.004) respectively. The complete absence of lucent lines under a tibia tray on an AP or lateral radiograph were associated with 96% (CI 0.02, 0.07) and 95% (CI 0.02, 0.09) reduced odds of aseptic tibia loosening. Careful examination of lucent lines under a tibia component can be highly predictive of aseptic loosening. The areas associated with highest risk of tibia loosening occur in zone 3 on the AP radiograph (medial or lateral to the keel) and zone 2 on the lateral radiograph (posteriorly). The risk of loosening in the absence of lucent line findings on plain films is significantly low

Modern modular revision stems employ tapered conical (TCR) distal stems designed for immediate axial and rotational stability with subsequent osseo-integration of the stem. Modular proximal segments allow the surgeon to achieve bone contact proximally with eventual ingrowth that protects the modular junction. The independent sizing of the proximal body and distal stem allows for each portion to obtain intimate bony contact and gives the surgeon the ability precisely control the femoral head center of rotation, offset, version, leg length, and overall stability. The most important advantage of modular revision stems is versatility - the ability to manage ALL levels of femoral bone loss (present before revision or created during revision). Used routinely, this allows the surgeon to quickly gain familiarity with the techniques and instruments for preparation and implantation and subsequently master the use for all variety of situations. This also allows the operating room staff to become comfortable with the instrumentation and components. Additionally, the ability to use the stem in all bone loss situations eliminates intra-operative shuffle (changes in the surgical plan resulting in more instruments being opened), as bone loss can be significantly under-estimated pre-operatively or may change intra-operatively. Furthermore, distal fixation can be obtained simply and reliably. Paprosky 1 femoral defects can be treated with a primary-type stem for the most part. All other femoral defects can be treated with a TCR stem. Fully porous coated stems also work for many revisions but why have two different revision stem choices available when the TCR stems work for ALL defects?. The most critical advantage is the ability to separate completely the critical task of fixation from other important tasks of restoring offset, leg length, and stability. Once fixation is secured, the surgeon can concentrate on hip stability and on optimization of hip mechanics (leg length and offset). The ability to do this allows the surgeon to maximise patient functionality post-operatively. Modular tapered stems have TWO specific advantages over monolithic stems in this important surgical task. The proximal body size and length can be adjusted AFTER stem insertion if the stem goes deeper than the trial. Further, proximal/distal bone size mismatch can be accommodated. The surgeon can control the diameter of the proximal body to ensure proper bony apposition independent of distal fitting needs. If the surgeon believes that proximal bone ingrowth is important to facilitate proximal bone remodeling, modular TCR stems can more easily accomplish this. The most under-appreciated advantage is the straightforward instrumentation system that makes the operation easier for the staff and the surgeon, while enhancing the operating room efficiency and reducing cost. Also, although the implant itself may result in more cost, most modular systems allow for a decrease in inventory requirements, which make up the cost differential. One theoretical disadvantage of modular revision stems is modular junction fracture, which can happen if the junction itself is not protected by bone. Ensuring proximal bone support can minimise this problem. Once porous ingrowth occurs proximally, the risk of junction fracture is eliminated. Even NON-modular stems fracture when proximal bone support is missing. Another theoretical issue is modular junction corrosion but this not a clinical one, since both components are titanium. One can also fail to connect properly the two parts during surgery

Introduction. As the proximal femoral bone is generally compromised in failed total hip arthroplasty, achievement of solid fixation with a new component can be technically demanding. Clinical studies have demonstrated good medium-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty using modular fluted and tapered distal fixation stems, but, to our knowledge, long-term outcomes have been rarely reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the minimum ten-year results of revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular fluted and tapered distal fixation stem. Materials & Methods. We analyzed 40 revision THAs performed in using a modular fluted and tapered distal fixation stem (Fig. 1) between December 1998 and February 2004. There were 11 men (12 hips) and 28 women (28 hips) with a mean age of 59 years (range, 38 to 79 years) at the time of revision THA. According to the Paprosky classification of femoral defects, 5 were Type II, 24 were Type IIIA, and 11 were Type IIIB. An extended trochanteric osteotomy was carried out in 21 (52%) of the 40 hips. Patients were followed for a mean of 11.7 years (range, 10 to 15 years). Results. The mean Harris hip score improved from 41 points preoperatively to 85 points at the time of the latest follow-up. A total of 4 hips required additional surgery. One hip had two-stage reconstruction due to deep infection, one had liner and head exchange for ceramic head fracture, one had isolated cup re-revision for aseptic loosening, and one had constrained component revision for recurrent dislocation. No repeat revision was performed due to aseptic loosening of femoral stem. There was no stem fracture at the modular junction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with an end point of stem re-revision for any reason was 98.1% at 11.7 years (Fig. 2), and, for aseptic stem loosening, the best-case scenario was 100% and the worst-case scenario was 91.9% at 11.7 years (Fig. 3). Conclusions. A modular fluted and tapered distal fixation stem continued to provide a reliable fixation at a minimum ten years after revision THA and can therefore be recommended as a promising option for challenging revision situations with femoral bone defects

Modularity in femoral revision stems was developed to reduce subsidence, leg length discrepancy and dislocation experienced in revision surgery. The Wagner SL Revision Stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) has been known for excellent bony fixation and proximal bony regeneration, but the third-generation proportional neck offset and 135° neck-shaft angle has an unknown track record. Our aim is to study the effect of these design modifications on stem subsidence, dislocation rate and stem survival. We reviewed 76 consecutive femoral revisions (70 patients; 50 M: 20 W; 67.7 yo [range; 37.7 – 86.6 yo]) with the Wagner SL implanted at our institution (2004–2012). No patient was lost to follow-up, but nine had died, and one patient was excluded for a Paprosky type I femoral bone defect. This leaves us 66 hips (60 patients) at 2 to 9.5 years of follow-up (mean 55 months; range, 24–114 months). Indications for revisions included aseptic stem loosening (62.1%), infection (13.6%), acetabular loosening (12.1%), recurrent dislocation (4.5%), periprosthetic (4.5%) and stem fracture (1.5%), and chondrolysis (1.5%). Patients were actively followed up at regular intervals to ascertain revision status and outcome measures including the Merle d'Aubigné (n=53), WOMAC questionnaires (n=59) and radiographs (n=66). Radiographs were evaluated for stem subsidence (mm). One of the surviving 66 stems was revised for recurrent deep infection (1.5%). No patient underwent revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening or subsidence. The mean preoperative WOMAC scores (P: 12.8; S: 5.6; F: 51.8) had improved significantly at follow-up (P: 9.7;, S: 4.3; F: 37.6) (p<0.05). The mean Merle D'Aubigné score went from a pre-op of 8.2 (SD: 2.8; range 1 to 14) to a mean of 15.3 (SD: 2.6; range 7 to 18) (p<0,05) at the latest follow-up. During the follow-up period, 3 hips dislocated (4.5%). Each event happened prior to six months after surgery. Only one of these cases dislocated twice. Closed reduction was performed in all cases. None required revision surgery subsequently, and they all remained stable. The stem survivorship is 98.4% at 5 years (0.95 CI: 93–100) and 97.4% at 7.5 years (0.95 CI: 88.9–100). Stem subsidence of 0 to 5 mm was considered as not clinically significant (n=20; 30%). Stem subsidence of 5 to 10 mm occurred in 5 hips (7.6%)and stem subsidence greater than 10 mm only occurred in one hips (1.5%). The third generation Wagner SL conical revision femoral stem has a lower rate of complication than its preceding generations, and is comparable to modular stems performance reported in current literature. These results motivate the authors to continue using monoblock conical revision femoral stems

The use of tapered, fluted, modular, distally fixing stems has increased in femoral revision surgery. The goal of this retrospective study was to assess mid- to long-term outcomes of this implant in femoral revision with bone loss. Seventy-one hips in 70 patients with a mean age of 68.5 years were followed for an average of 10 years. Pre-operative HHS averaged 50 and improved to an average of 87 post-operatively. Seventy-nine percent hips had Paprosky type 3A, 3B or 4 bone-loss and 44% had an associated proximal femoral osteotomy. All stems osseointegrated distally (100%). Two hips subsided >5mm (mean 8mm) but achieved secondary stability. Sixty-eight percent hips had evidence of bony reconstitution and 21% demonstrated diaphyseal stress-shielding. One stem fractured at its modular junction and was revised with a mechanical failure rate of 1.4%. Distal fixation and clinical improvement were reproducibly achieved with this stem design

I use monolithic, cylindrical, fully porous coated femoral components for many femoral revisions. Our institutional database holds information on 1000 femoral revisions using extensively porous-coated stems. To date, 27 stems have been re-revised (14 for loosening, 4 for infection, 7 for stem fracture, 2 at time of periprosthetic femoral fracture). Using femoral re-revision for any reason as an end point, the survivorship is 99 ± 0.8% (95% confidence interval) at 2 years, 97 ± 1.3% at 5 years, 95.6 ± 1.8% at 10 years, and 94.5 ± 2.2% at 15 years. Similar to Moreland and Paprosky, we have identified pre-revision bone stock as a factor affecting femoral fixation. Among the 777 femoral revisions graded for femoral bone loss, 59% of the femurs were graded as having no cortical damage before the revision, 29% had cortical damage extending no more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter, and 12% had cortical damage that extended more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. When the cortical damage involved bone more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter, the survivorship, using femoral re-revision for any reason or definite radiographic loosening as an end point, was reduced significantly, as compared with femoral revisions with less cortical damage. In addition to patients with Paprosky type 3B and 4 femoral defects there are rare patients with femoral canals smaller than 13.5 mm or larger than 26 mm that are not well suited to this technique. Eight and 10” stems 13.5 or smaller should be used with caution if there is no proximal bone support for fear of breaking. Patients with canals larger than 18 mm may be better suited for a titanium tapered stem with flutes. While a monolithic stem is slightly more difficult for a surgeon to insert than a modular femoral stem there is little worry about taper junction failure

The use of tapered, fluted, modular, distally fixing stems has increased in femoral revision surgery. The goal of this retrospective study was to assess mid-term to long-term outcomes of this implant in femoral revision with bone-loss. Seventy-one hips in 70 patients with a mean age of 68.5 years were followed for an average of 10 years. Preoperative HHS averaged 50 and improved to an average of 87 postoperatively. Seventy-nine percent hips had Paprosky type 3A, 3B or 4 bone-loss and 44% had an associated proximal femoral osteotomy. All stems osseointegrated distally (100%). Two hips subsided >5mm (mean 8mm) but achieved secondary stability. Sixty-eight percent hips had evidence of bony reconstitution and 21% demonstrated diaphyseal stress- shielding. One stem fractured at its modular junction and was revised with a mechanical failure rate of 1.4%. Distal fixation and clinical improvement were reproducibly achieved with this stem design

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty (THR) with non-cemented or hybrid fixation remains one of the most successful procedures performed today. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a hydroxyapatite (HA) coated, hemispherical cup. Material and Methods. Between 2003 and 2007, 223 THAs (210 patients) with peripheral self-locking (PSL) cup and highly cross-linked polyethylene (Crossfire, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) with minimum 5 years clinical and radiographic follow-up (5–9 years) were analyzed. The mean age was 62.5 years ± 10.8 (range, 32.7 – 86.3) at the time of surgery and the predominant preoperative diagnoses was osteoarthritis (97.8%). 72% were solid cups without screw augmentation and 28% were multi-hole with screw. Clinical analysis included Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) hip scores at latest follow-up. Detail radiographic analysis was carried out on anteroposterior and false profile views for evidence of osseointegration in all Charnley's zones. Osseointegration was assessed based on presence of Stress Induced Reactive Cancellous Bone (SIRCaB) with trabecular bone hypertrophy 5–15mm extending from the cup, and absence of radiolucency or demarcation. EBRA software was used to assess cup positioning. Results. At final follow up, clinical result were excellent with average HSS score of 34.8. 4% underwent revision for following reasons: dislocation (1.34%), loose stem (0.89%), stem fracture (0.89%), pain/bursitis (0.45%), and infection (0.45%). There were no revisions for failures of fixation. In radiographic analysis, the average functional cup abduction angle and functional anteversion were 41.7° ± 5.2 (range, 30 – 52) and 16.8° ± 6.1 (range, 4 – 30). 96% of the cups were within the safezone of Lewinnek. There was no progressive radiolucency, migration or change in the cup position at final follow-up. The average overall SIRCaB and radial trabeculae in all 3 zones were 47% and 93%, respectively; both were most prevalent in Zone 1. Conclusion. The hemispherical, peripheral press-fit, HA-coated PSL cup has excellent safety and efficacy, appropriate radiographic osseointegration with no mechanical failures at 5 – 9 years. PSL cup has 1 mm increase in the radius at the periphery of the shell to allow for an enhanced initial press fit. Based on our results, supplementary screw with this cup may not lead to better fixation

I prefer monolithic, cylindrical, fully porous coated femoral components for most femoral revisions. Our institutional database holds information on 1000 femoral revisions using extensively porous-coated stems. To date, 27 stems have been rerevised (14 for loosening, 4 for infection, 7 for stem fracture, 2 at time of periprosthetic femoral fracture). Using femoral rerevision for any reason as an end point, the survivorship is 99 ± 0.8% (95% confidence interval) at 2 years, 97 ± 1.3% at 5 years, 95.6 ± 1.8% at 10 years, and 94.5 ± 2.2% at 15 years. Similar to Moreland and Paprosky, we have identified prerevision bone stock as a factor affecting femoral fixation. Among the 777 femoral revisions graded for femoral bone loss, 59% of the femurs were graded as having no cortical damage before the revision, 29% had cortical damage extending no more than 10cm below the lesser trochanter, and 12% had cortical damage that extended more than 10cm below the lesser trochanter. When the cortical damage involved bone more than 10cm below the lesser trochanter, the survivorship, using femoral rerevision for any reason or definite radiographic loosening as an end point, was reduced significantly, as compared with femoral revisions with less cortical damage. In addition to patients with Paprosky type 3B and 4 femoral defects there are rare patients with femoral canals smaller than 13.5mm or larger than 26mm that are not well suited to this technique. Eight and 10-inch stems 13.5 or smaller should be used with caution if there is no proximal bone support for fear of breaking. Patients with canals larger than 18mm may be better suited for a titanium tapered stem with flutes. While a monolithic stem is slightly more difficult for a surgeon to insert than a modular femoral stem there is little worry about taper junction failure

Introduction:. Severe bone loss creates a challenge for fixation in femoral revision. The goal of the study was to assess reproducibility of fixation and clinical outcomes of femoral revision with bone loss using a modular, fluted, tapered distally fixing stem. Methods:. 92 consecutive patients (96 hips) underwent hip revision surgery using the same design of a modular, fluted, tapered titanium stem between 1998 and 2005. Fourteen patients with 16 hips died before a 2-year follow-up. Eighty hips were followed for an average of 11.3 years (range of 8 to 13.5 years). Bone loss was classified as per Paprosky's classification, osseointegration assessed according to a modified system of Engh et al, and Harris Hip Score was used to document pain and function. Serial radiographs were reviewed by an independent observer to assess subsidence, osseointegration and bony reconstitution. Results:. The average patient age was 68 years at the time of surgery (range 40 to 91). 80% hips had at least Paprosky type 3A proximal bone loss and 41% had an associated proximal femoral ostoetomy. Pre-operative Harris Hip scores (HHS) averaged 50.368 (range 22 to 72.775) and improved to an average HHS of 87.432 (range 63.450 to 99.825) at last follow-up. The HHS improved an average of 37.103 points (range 13.750 to 58.950). Radiographically, osseointegration was evident in all hips. No hips had measurable migration beyond 5 mm. 61%) hips had evidence of bone reconstitution and 27% demonstrated diaphyseal stress shielding. One well-fixed distal stem was revised for stem fracture, and two proximal segments were revised for recurrent dislocation. Conclusion:. Reproducible fixation and clinical improvement were consistently achieved with this stem design in the setting of femoral bone loss

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the midterm results of cementless revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Wagner Cone Prosthesis. Material and Methods. Between 1996 and 2007, 36 hips in 36 consecutive patients underwent femoral revision THA using Wagner Cone Prosthesis. Among them 28 hips were followed for more than 5 years. The mean age at revision surgery was 57 years and a mean follow-up was 7.6 years. The Paprosky classification system was used for preoperative bone loss evaluation. Clinical results were evaluated using Harris hip scores. For evaluation of the femoral component, radiolucent lines at bone-implant interfaces were evaluated and femoral component vertical subsidence was measured. Heterotopic bone formation and complications were also evaluated. Results. The mean period from 1. st. operation to revision THA was 8.0 years. For the femoral bone loss, in eleven hips bone grafting was done. For the prevention of femoral stem fracture, femoral wiring was done in 12 hips. In eighteen hips acetabular cup revision was done simultaneously and in 5 hips isolated stem revision was done. The mean Harris hip score improved from 52 to 83 at final follow-up. With respect to radiological results all femoral stems showed bone ingrowths, 3 out of 28 (10.7%) femoral stems showed subsidence more than 5 mm. Two patients needed acetabular revision for acetabular loosening during follow up period. There was one patient who complained of anterior thigh pain. One patient had recurrent dislocation and required revision surgery for soft tissue augmentation. Conclusions. We achieved favorable midterm clinical and radiological results for femoral stem revisions using Wagner cone prosthesis. This cementless femoral stem can be a good option for femoral stem revision

Favourable long-term results have been reported with the standard Exeter cemented stem. We report our experience with a version for use in smaller femora, the Exeter 35.5 mm stem. Although, also a collarless polished taper, the stem is slimmer and 25 mm shorter than a standard stem. Between August 1988 and August 2003, 192 primary hip arthroplasties were performed in 165 patients using the Exeter 35.5 mm stem. Clinical and operative data were collected prospectively. Clinical evaluation was by the Charnley, Harris and Oxford hip scores and radiographs were analysed post-operatively and at latest follow up. The mean age at time of operation was 53 years (18 to 86), with 73 patients under the age of 50 years. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 91, hip dysplasia in 77, inflammatory arthritis in 18, septic arthritis of the hip in three, secondary to Perthes disease in two and avascular necrosis of the hip in one patient. The fate of every implant is known. At a median follow-up of 8 years (5 to 19), survivorship with revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 100%. Fifteen cases (7.8%) underwent further surgery 11 for acetabular revision, one for stem fracture and three others. Although, smaller than a standard Exeter Universal polished tapered cemented stem—with a shorter, slimmer taper—the performance of the Exeter 35.5 mm stem was equally good even in this young, diverse group of patients

I prefer monolithic, cylindrical, fully porous coated femoral components for most femoral revisions. Our institutional database holds information on 1000 femoral revisions using extensively porous-coated stems. To date, 27 stems have been rerevised (14 for loosening, 4 for infection, 7 for stem fracture, 2 at time of periprosthetic femoral fracture). Using femoral rerevision for any reason as an end point, the survivorship is 99 ± 0.8% (95% confidence interval) at 2 years, 97 ± 1.3% at 5 years, 95.6 ± 1.8% at 10 years, and 94.5 ± 2.2% at 15 years. Similar to Moreland and Paprosky, we have identified prerevision bone stock as a factor affecting femoral fixation. Among the 777 femoral revisions graded for femoral bone loss, 59% of the femurs were graded as having no cortical damage before the revision, 29% had cortical damage extending no more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter, and 12% had cortical damage that extended more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. When the cortical damage involved bone more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter, the survivorship, using femoral rerevision for any reason or definite radiographic loosening as an end point, was reduced significantly, as compared with femoral revisions with less cortical damage. In addition to patients with Paprosky type 3B and 4 femoral defects there are rare patients with femoral canals smaller than 13.5 mm or larger than 26 mm that are not well suited to this technique. Eight and 10” stems 13.5 or smaller should be used with caution if there is no proximal bone support for fear of breaking. Patients with canals larger than 18 mm may be better suited for a titanium tapered stem with flutes. While a monolithic stem is slightly more difficult for a surgeon to insert than a modular femoral stem there is little worry about taper junction failure

The C-Stem in its design as a triple tapered stem, is the logical development of the original Charnley flat-back polished stem. The concept, design and the surgical technique cater for a limited slip of the stem within the cement mantle transferring the load more proximally. Five thousand two hundred and thirty three primary procedures using a C-stem have been carried out since 1993. We reviewed all 621 cases that had their total hip arthroplasty before 1998. Sixty nine patients (70 hips) had died and 101 hips had not reached a ten-year clinical and radiological follow-up and had not been revised. Thirty-two hips had been revised before 10 years, none were revised for aseptic stem loosening and no stems. The indications for revision were Infection in 4, dislocation in 3, aseptic cup loosening in 24 and unexplained pain in 1. The remaining 418 hips had a mean follow-up of 12 years (range 10–15 years). There were 216 women and 173 men, and 34 patients had bilateral LFAs. The patients' mean age at surgery was 53 years (range 16–83 years). Thirty four hips had been revised at the time of review. The reasons for revision were infection in 5, dislocation in 2, aseptic cup loosening in 24 and 1 for neuralgia paraesthetica where the stem was well fixed. Two hips were revised for stem fracture. There were no revisions for stem loosening but 2 stems were revised for fracture - both with a defective cement mantle proximally. The clinical results are very encouraging and they support the concept of the Charnley cemented low friction arthroplasty, but place a demand on the understanding of the technique and its execution at surgery

We have investigated whether improvements in design have altered the outcome for patients undergoing endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur following tumour resection. Survival of the implant and ‘servicing’ procedures have been documented using a prospective database and review of the implant design records and case records. A total of 335 patients underwent a distal femoral replacement with 162 having a fixed hinge design and 173 a rotating hinge with most of the latter group having a hydroxyapatite collar at the bone prosthesis junction. The median age of the patients was 24 years (range 13-82 yrs). With a minimum follow up of 5 years and a maximum of 30 years, 192 patients remain alive with a median follow-up of 11 years. The risk of revision for any reason was 17% at 5 years, 34% at 10 years and 58% at 20 years. One in ten patients developed an infection and 42% of these patients eventually required an amputation. Aseptic loosening was the most common reason for revision in the fixed hinge knees whilst infection and stem fracture were the most common reason in the rotating hinges. The risk of revision for aseptic loosening in the fixed hinges was 32% at ten years compared with nil for the rotating hinge knees with a hydroxyapatite collar. The overall risk of revision for any reason was halved by use of the rotating hinge, and for patients older than 40 years at time of implant. Conclusion. Improvements in design of distal femoral replacements have significantly decreased the risk of revision surgery. Infection remains a serious problem for these patients