Background. Clinical guidelines recommend epidural steroid injection (ESI) as a treatment option for severe disc-related sciatica, but there is considerable uncertainty about its effectiveness. Currently, we know very little about factors that might be associated with good or poor outcomes from ESI. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and appraise the evidence investigating prognostic factors associated with outcomes following ESI for patients with imaging confirmed disc-related sciatica. Methods. The search strategy involved the electronic databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and reference lists of eligible studies. Selected papers were quality appraised independently by two reviewers using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Between study heterogeneity precluded statistical pooling of results. Results. 2726 citations were identified; 11 studies were eligible. Overall study quality was low with all judged to have moderate or high risk of bias. Forty-five prognostic factors were identified but were measured inconsistently. The most commonly assessed prognostic factors were related to pain and function (n=7 studies), imaging features (n=6 studies), health and lifestyle (n=5 studies), patient demographics (n=4 studies) and clinical assessment findings (n=4 studies). No prognostic factor was found to be consistently associated with outcomes following ESI. Most studies found no association or results that conflicted with other studies. Conclusions. There is little, and low quality, evidence to guide practice in terms of factors that predict outcomes in patients following ESI for disc-related sciatica. The results can help inform some of the decisions about potential prognostic factors that should be assessed in future well-designed prospective cohort studies. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This study is supported by Health Education England and the National Institute for Health Research (HEE/ NIHR ICA Programme Clinical Lectureship, Dr Siobhan Stynes, NIHR300441). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care

Aim. To systematically review the literature and anatomical atlases on LM morphology. Methods. Relevant studies were searched in PubMed (Medline) and Science Direct. Anatomical atlases were retrieved from multiple university libraries and online. Included atlases and studies were assessed at five items: visuals present(y/n), quality of visuals(in-/sufficient), labelling of multifidus (y/n), clear description of region of interest(y/n), description of plane has been described(y/n). This risk of bias assessment tool was developed to assess the quality of description of anatomy, since existing risk of bias tables have only been developed to assess the methodology of studies. Results. In total 69 studies and 19 anatomical atlases were included. Studies. - 52 of 69 studies, LM was described as a superficial muscle at the levels L4 – S1. Others presented the LM as deep intrinsic muscle. - Most used methods: MRI, ultrasound imaging or drawings. - 32 of 69 studies scored a total of five points at the risk of bias assessment, which means low risk of bias. Anatomical atlases. - LM is shown as a deep intrinsic back muscle covered by the erector spinae and fascia thoracolumbalis. - Most anatomical atlases (8/19) had a score of four points at the risk of bias assessment. Conclusion. Anatomy atlases reported different LM morphology compared to anatomical studies. Even between studies, there appears to be inconsistent reporting in LM anatomy. Variation in research methods that are used for measuring LM morphology could influence variation in describing and presenting LM morphology. Standardization of research methodology is recommended in order to compare studies. No conflicts of interest. Sources of Funding: SIA RAAK-Publiek

Purpose. This review aims to explore the methodologies used for estimating the direct and indirect costs attributed to back pain in developed countries. Methods. Six databases were searched to uncover studies about the direct and indirect costs of back pain published in English upto November 2016. Data extracted included study characteristics, cost categories and analysis methods. Results were synthesised descriptively. Results. The search identified 8009 potential studies, of which 40 were included for data extraction. The included studies reported data from 14 industrialised countries with considerably varying methodologies. Most of the studies (n=25) followed a retrospective study design and cost perspective was largely societal (n=26). Nearly half of the selected studies included indirect costs in their analysis as well as direct costs; and the proportion of indirect costs in most of the studies far outweighed the direct costs (3:1 ratio). The analysis method used most frequently was the top-down approach (n=13) followed by bottom-up approach (n=7) and econometric methods (n=7). Inpatient costs and absenteeism costs were the most important cost drivers accounting for 12%−35% of the direct costs and 5%−67% of the indirect costs respectively. The healthcare costs associated with back pain in the UK were estimated at £1.6 billion in 1998 while the indirect costs ranged from £5 billion to £10.7 billion. Conclusions. This is the first methodological systematic review assessing the costs of back pain. Despite differences in methodology, the economic burden of back pain is significant. Development of guideline and standardisation of methodologies is needed for future studies. Conflict of interest: None. Sources of funding: None

Much debate exists over the value of exercise therapy for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aims to address the current evidence. An extensive search was carried out using the common medical databases, limiting results to clinical trials in English involving humans with defined outcome measures. 155 papers were identified and after applying strict inclusion criteria 12 papers remained for further analysis. These included 9 prospective cohort trials, 2 retrospective cohort trials and one case series. No randomised controlled trials were identified. Although all of the papers concluded an improvement in scoliotic curve after exercise therapy, not one of the papers had reliable methods or results to validate their conclusions. Identified shortcomings included, poor compliance with outpatient exercise regimes with no clear indication of who assessed for curve improvement, how it was assessed or what experience they had, nor was observer error for Cobb angle measurement taken into account. Additionally only a few of the studies had sound statistical analysis and no study could comment on whether the improvements seen were maintained after the exercise regime. Four previous systematic reviews have been performed finding favourable results for exercise therapy, but these were written by authors involved in the original research, adding significant reviewer bias. This systematic review has revealed only poor and low level evidence supporting the use of exercise therapy for treating AIS. Well designed controlled trials with randomisation are required to validate exercise therapy as an effective treatment option and as an appropriate use of NHS funds

Background and aims. The EU-funded Back-UP project aims to develop a cloud computer platform to guide the treatment of low back and neck pain (LBNP) in first contact care and early rehabilitation. In order to identify evidence-based treatment options that can be recommended and are accessible to people with LBNP across Europe, we conducted a systematic review of recently published guidelines. Methods. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, HMIC, Epistemonikos, PEDro, TRIP, NICE, SIGN, WHO, Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) and DynaMed Plus were searched. We searched for guidelines published by European health professional or guideline development organisations since 2013, focusing on the primary care management of adult patients presenting with back or neck pain (including whiplash associated symptoms, radicular pain, and pregnancy-related LBP). The AGREE-II tool was used to assess the quality of guideline development and reporting. Results. Searches generated 3098 unique citations that were screened for eligibility. A total of 189 full-texts were retrieved, and 18 guidelines were included in the review (from the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Denmark, Poland, Belgium, and the Netherlands). Data extraction showed considerable variation in guideline development processes, especially regarding the methods used for identifying, appraising, and synthesising evidence, and for formulating, agreeing, and grading recommendations. Conclusions. Recommendations for the management of LBNP cover a wide range of treatment options, with self-management advice, analgesics, and exercise proposed as core treatments by most guidelines. A narrative synthesis, taking into account consistency, strength, and quality of guideline recommendations, will be presented. No conflicts of interest. Funding: This abstract presents independent research within the Back-UP project, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 777090. This document reflects only the views of the authors, and the European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of its contents. The information in this document is provided “as is”, without warranty of any kind, and accept no liability for loss or damage suffered by any person using this information

Background Context. SPECT-CT is a hybrid imaging modality, which has become very well established in the diagnosis of inflammatory, vascular and malignant processes affecting the spine. However, little evidence exists on its application with degenerative pathologies. Purpose & Study Design. Systematic review on the use of SPECT-CT in the diagnosis of degenerative facet joint arthropathy. Patient Sample. 824 patients across 10 studies conducted over the last 6 years (2012 – 2018), with a mean age of 51.8 years old. All studies excluded patients with malignancy, infection or inflammatory aetiologies or those related to acute trauma. Only degenerative pathologies of the lumbar spine in an adult population were included. Methods. A systematic review of the literature available on the topic was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane, Medline and Embase online databases of journal articles. Results. Five studies focused on SPECT-CT alone / versus CT. Two focused on SPECT-CT vs MRI, and three focussed on SPECT-CT guided facet joint injections. Of these 10 studies, seven concluded with results supporting SPECT CT's use, two reported discordance between SPECT-CT findings with those diagnosed from clinical examination / MRI scans, and one study's conclusions were equivocal. Conclusion. SPECT-CT shows promise as an imaging adjunct in assisting with the diagnosis and subsequent treatment of degenerative facet joint arthropathies. In patients whose MRI scans reveal multiple potential pain generators, SPECT-CT could help differentiate between clinically significant sources of pain and may even serve a purpose in guiding facet joint injections in patients with inconclusive MRI / CT scans. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background. Recommendations in clinical practice guidelines for non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) are not necessarily translated into practice. Multiple research studies have investigated different strategies to implement best evidence into practice yet no synthesis of these studies is available. Objectives. To systematically review available studies to determine whether implementation efforts in this field have been successful; to identify which strategies have been most successful in changing healthcare practitioner behaviours and patient outcomes. Methods. A systematic review was undertaken, searching electronic databases, hand searching, writing to key authors and using prior knowledge of the field to identify papers. Included papers evaluated a strategy to implement best evidence about management of NSLBP into practice; measured key outcomes regarding change in practitioner behaviour/patient outcomes and subjected their data to statistical analysis. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) recommendations about data extraction and synthesis were followed. Study inclusion, data extraction and study risk of bias assessments were conducted independently. Results. Of 7654 potentially eligible citations, 17 papers reporting on 14 studies were included. Single/one-off implementation efforts were consistently unsuccessful. Increasing the frequency and duration of strategies led to greater success with those continuously ongoing over time the most successful. Risk of bias was highly variable with 7 of 17 papers rated at high risk. Conclusions. One-off implementation strategies may seem attractive but are largely unsuccessful in effecting meaningful change in practice. Increasing frequency and duration of strategies results in greater success and the most successful implementation strategies use consistently sustained interventions

Background. Leg pain frequently accompanies low back pain and is associated with increased levels of disability and higher health costs than simple low back pain. Distinguishing between different types of low back- related leg pain (LBLP) is important for clinical management and research applications. The aim of this systematic review was to identify, describe and appraise papers that classify or subgroup populations with LBLP. Methods. The search strategy involved nine electronic databases including Medline and Embase, reference lists of eligible studies and relevant reviews. Selected papers were quality appraised independently by two reviewers using a standardised scoring tool. Results. Of 13,337 potential eligible citations, 49 relevant papers were identified that reported on 20 classification systems. Papers were grouped according to purpose and criteria of the classification systems. Five themes emerged: (i) pathoanatomical sources of pain (ii) clinical features, (iii) pain mechanisms, (iv) treatment based approach and (v) screening tools and prediction rules. Four of the twenty systems focused specifically on LBLP populations. Pain mechanisms and treatment based approach systems scored highest following quality appraisal as authors generally included statistical methods to develop their classifications and supporting work had been published on the systems' validity, reliability and generalizability. Conclusion. Numerous classification systems exist that include patients with leg pain, a minority of them focus specifically on distinguishing between different presentations of leg pain. Further work is needed to identify clinically meaningful subgroups of LBLP patients, ideally based on large primary care cohort populations and using stringent methods for classification system development. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. S Stynes is supported by an NIHR/HEE Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowship. Dr Konstantinou is supported by an HEFCE/NIHR Senior Clinical Lectureship. Professor Dunn is supported by the Wellcome Trust (083572)

Purpose and background. Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) is frequently and increasingly used in lumbar degenerative disorders despite conflicting results and recommendations. Further understanding of patient outcomes after LSF is required to inform decisions regarding surgery and to improve post-surgery management. The objective was to evaluate the course of pain and disability in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine (spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, disc herniation, discogenic low back pain) after first-time LSF. Methods and results. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pain and disability outcomes in prospective cohort studies after first time LSF for degenerative disorders. Two independent researchers searched key databases, determined study eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (modified Quality in Prognostic Studies tool). A third reviewer mediated at each stage. N weighted pooled estimates were calculated. Twenty-five articles (n=1,777 participants) were included. 17 studies were at unclear risk of bias and 8 at high risk. Back pain (12 studies) decreased modestly and irregularly at follow-up intervals. The n weighted mean VAS back pain decreased from 65.4 (±3.3) pre-surgery to 22.2 (±3.1) at 23 months, but then 45.0 (±not reported; 2 studies at risk of bias) at 42 months. In contrast, leg pain (12 studies) improved substantially short and long-term. Disability (20 studies) improved steadily over time with the exception of the 42-months and 48-months intervals. Conclusion. The overall improvement of leg pain and disability after first-time LSF in degenerative disorders is promising in contrast to back pain outcomes. Further research is needed to analyse outcomes in patients of different diagnostic subgroups. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None

Background and Purpose. Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) poses a significant disability and economic burden worldwide. Fear avoidance is suggested to contribute to its chronicity and reduced treatment effect. National guidelines recommend exercise as a component of multidisciplinary rehabilitation but its interaction with fear avoidance is ambiguous. This systematic review examined the effect of exercise-based interventions (EBIs) on fear avoidance NSCLBP. Methods and Results. RCTs comparing EBIs to usual care in adults with NSCLBP were included. A systematic search of CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library (up to January 2019) revealed 10 eligible trials. Following risk of bias assessment, 6 studies were included for data extraction and narrative synthesis. EBIs were not found superior to usual care in reducing fear avoidance at any follow-up. There was evidence that reducing fear avoidance is probably not the mechanism through which EBIs affect pain and disability. In adherent patients, EBIs did not result in greater clinically relevant improvements in pain or disability than usual care, in the short- or intermediate-term. Conclusion. Addition of EBIs as part of multidisciplinary rehabilitation is not more beneficial than that of usual care in reducing fear avoidance in NSCLBP patients. However, the findings of this review are based on heterogenous studies presenting with methodological limitations. Further high-quality research is required to examine the review's findings and investigate current physiotherapy management of fear avoidance in NSCLBP. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Study Purpose. To review systematically review literature on the early diagnosis of spinal metastases and prediction of spinal cord compression (SCC) due to spinal metastases. Methods and results. From 13 electronic bibliographic databases were searched we identified 2,425 potentially relevant articles of which 31 met the inclusion criteria. These were quality appraised. Seventeen studies reported retrospective data, 10 were prospective studies, and three were other study designs. There was one systematic review. There were no randomised controlled trials. There were approximately 7,900 participants in the included studies and 5,782 participants were analysed. The sample sizes ranged from 41 to 859. Cancers reported were: lung alone (n=3); prostate alone (n=6); breast alone (n=7); mixed cancers (n=13); and unclear (n=1). Ninety-three prognostic factors were identified as potentially significant in predicting risk of SCC or collapse. Many of the included studies provided limited information about patient population and selection criteria and they varied in methodological quality, rigour and transparency. Several studies with mixed case populations identified type of cancer (e.g. breast, lung or prostate cancer) as a significant factor in predicting SCC, but determining the risk differential is difficult because of residual bias in studies. Overall the quality of the research was poor. The only predictors identified for SCC were number of spinal metastases, duration of disease, total disease burden and immediate symptomatology of cord involvement. Conclusion. It is disappointing that no factors other than duration, disease burden, and immediate symptomatology predict SCC. Early appropriate identification remains a clinical challenge

Background. Routine imaging (radiography, CT, MRI) provides no health benefits for low back pain (LBP) patients and is not recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Whether imaging leads to increased costs, healthcare utilization or absence from work is unclear. Purpose. To systematically review if imaging in patients with LBP increases costs, leads to higher health care utilization or increases absence from work. METHODS. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs), comparing imaging versus no imaging on targeted outcomes were extracted from medical databases until October 2017. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of the body of evidence was determined using GRADE methodology. Results. Moderate quality evidence (1 RCT; n=421) supports that direct costs increase for patients undergoing radiography. Low quality evidence (3 OSs; n=9535) supports that early MRI leads to a large increase in costs. Moderate quality evidence (2 RCTs, 6 OSs; n=19392) supports that performing MRI, radiography or CT is associated with increased healthcare utilization. Two RCTs (n=667) showed no significant differences between radiography or MRI groups compared with no imaging groups on absence from work. However, the results of two observational studies (n=7765) did show significantly greater absence from work in the imaging groups compared to the no imaging-groups. Conclusions. Imaging in LBP is associated with higher medical costs and increased healthcare utilisation. There are indications that it also leads to higher absence from work. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Aims/background. Current treatment recommendations advocate various exercise modalities for people with chronic Low Back Pain (cLBP). 1. Walking appears to represent an inexpensive and readily accessible activity for a range of individuals, including those who were previously sedentary. However, the effectiveness of such interventions are uncertain in cLBP. Methods. A systematic review was undertaken to examine the effectiveness of walking interventions across a range of chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions, including LBP. Six electronic databases were searched for relevant studies. Data for pain and self reported function were extracted and where appropriate, results were pooled and analysed using RevMan (v.5). Results. Twenty studies with a total of 1852 participants (Mean: 96) were included in the review. Only two provided data for cLBP, Data from one of these was not analysed as only median values were reported. The remaining study found no effect in favour of the walking intervention for pain (mean difference = −0.50 [95% confidence interval = −16.23, 17.23]) with a moderate improvement in function (−22.56 [−40.84, −4.26]). For osteoarthritis, analysis revealed small to moderate differences for both pain (−6.23 [−11.22, −1.24]; n=7) and function (−10.90 [−20.61, −1.19]; n=5). Discussion. Despite the potential benefits associated with walking, results of this systematic review found limited evidence to support the use of such interventions for people with cLBP. Further studies where walking is the predominant component of an overall intervention and which closely monitor any associated adverse events are required

Study Purpose. A systematic review of the current literature to address the debate of the optimal surgical approach for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Method. All studies comparing anterior open instrumented surgery with posterior instrumented surgery in patients with AIS, written in English and published up until February 2010 were included. Electronic databases searched included Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane database using “AIS” and “surgery” as key words. Outcome measures considered to be important were specifically identified in each paper included: Blood loss (ml); operation time (mins); hospital stay (days); curve correction (sagittal and coronal); number of fused levels; pulmonary function, and complications. Results. Twenty one relevant papers were identified from a possible 399. Nine of these studies were performed prospectively with four involving more than one centre. The average total number of patients in each study was 246 with a mean pre-operative curve Cobb angle of 47 degrees in those patients treated via anterior surgical instrumentation and 52 degrees with posterior surgery. Three papers showed significant reduction in blood loss with anterior surgery while four studies observed a reduction in operative time and length of hospital stay with posterior surgery. Eleven papers analysed curve correction specifically and while comparable correction was achievable with both approaches the number of fusion levels was significantly fewer with anterior fixation in all. Three of the four studies evaluating lung function demonstrated that patients undergoing posterior fusion had better measures of pulmonary function than the anterior group. No significant difference was observed between the two approaches with regards to complications. Conclusion. Both surgical approaches have their merits and disadvantages. Our study has not demonstrated one approach to be overall superior. Approach selection should be based on the advantages offered by each approach to the individual patient and the surgeon's own experience in spinal deformity correction

Background to the study

The use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to measure effectiveness of care, and supporting patient management is being advocated increasingly. When evaluating outcome it is important to identify a PROM with good measurement properties.

Purpose of study and background. This systematic review sought to determine the efficacy of such targeted treatment in adults with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Many clinicians and researchers believe that tailoring treatment to subgroups of NSLBP positively impacts on patient outcomes. Method and results. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, AMED, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, reference list searching and citation tracking. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of targeted manual therapy and/or exercise for NSLPB that used trial designs capable of providing robust information on targeted treatment (treatment effect modification) for the outcomes of activity limitation and pain. Included trials needed to be hypothesis-testing studies published in English, Danish or Norwegian. Method quality was assessed using the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria. Four high-quality trials of targeted manual therapy and/or exercise for NSLBP met the inclusion criteria. One study showed statistically significant effects for short-term outcomes using McKenzie directional preference-based exercise. Other included studies showed effects that might be clinically important in size but were not statistically significant with their samples sizes, as research into subgroups requires much larger sample sizes than traditional two-group trials. Conclusions. The clinical implications of these results are that they provide very cautious evidence supporting the notion that treatment targeted to subgroups of patients with NSLBP may improve patient outcomes. The results were too patchy, inconsistent, and investigated in samples too small for clinical recommendations to be based on these findings. The research implications are that adequately powered controlled trials of treatment effect modification are uncommon

Background

About 85% of the patients with low back pain seeking medical care have nonspecific low back pain (NsLBP), implying that no definitive cause can be identified. Many pain conditions are linked with elevated serum levels of (pro-)inflammatory biomarkers.

Background and purpose

To identify methods used to measure free living sedentary behaviour in people with back pain and review the validity and reliability of identified measures.

Objectives. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the safety and efficacy of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) compared with bone graft when used specifically for revision spinal fusion surgery secondary to pseudarthrosis. Methods. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched using defined search terms. The primary outcome measure was spinal fusion, assessed as success or failure in accordance with radiograph, MRI or CT scan review at 24-month follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was time to fusion. Results. A total of six studies (three prospective and three retrospective) reporting on the use of BMP2 met the inclusion criteria (203 patients). Of these, four provided a comparison of BMP2 and bone graft whereas the other two solely investigated the use of BMP2. The primary outcome was seen in 92.3% (108/117) of patients following surgery with BMP2. Although none of the studies showed superiority of BMP2 to bone graft for fusion, its use was associated with a statistically quicker time to achieving fusion. BMP2 did not appear to increase the risk of complication. Conclusion. The use of BMP2 is both safe and effective within the revision setting, ideally in cases where bone graft is unavailable or undesirable. Further research is required to define its optimum role. Cite this article: Mr P. Bodalia. Effectiveness and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for adults with lumbar spine pseudarthrosis following spinal fusion surgery: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:145–152. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000418

Background

Exercise is a complex intervention, and often has more than one treatment target. Results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) typically show small to moderate effect sizes, but these may differ where outcomes better reflect the targets of interventions. This review aimed to describe what treatment targets, outcome domains and primary outcome measures are used in exercise RCTs, and examined how well the selected outcome domains match the treatment targets used in each RCT.