Abstract. Background. The use of tourniquet in knee arthroplasty is common but in recent times, it has initiated a debate on its use. Complications from use of tourniquet are well documented in literature but there is less evidence on thigh pain, blood loss and length of stay post arthroplasty. Methods. We included 62 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty either Unicondylar knee arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty. Patients were allocated randomly in tourniquet and without tourniquet groups. Half of the patients had UKA and other half TKA. Thigh pain was recorded using Visual analogue scale on day 1, 2 and on discharge. A drop in pre-operative and post operative haemoglobin level was recorded too. Independent sample t-test was done to compare the difference between the 2 groups mainly, drop in haemoglobin, thigh pain, knee pain and length of stay. Results. The mean drop in haemoglobin was comparable and was not statistically significant. Thigh pain on day 1 in no tourniquet group had a mean value of 0 and statistically significant difference in thigh pain at day 1,2 and discharge. In subgroup analysis between TKA and UKA the latter had improved results. Conclusions. Knee arthroplasty surgery without the use of tourniquet provides less thigh pain in the post-operative period and there isn't any significant difference in post op haemoglobin drop. None of the patient required any blood transfusion. A trend of early discharge was noted too but probably due to sample size, it wasn't statistically significant

We report the effect of padding on the efficiency of the pneumatic tourniquet for the upper limb. Varying thicknesses of two commercially-available types of orthopaedic padding (Cellona and Velband) were applied to the arms of 20 volunteers, with three pressure transducers placed directly beneath the padding. A tourniquet was positioned over the padding and inflated to 220 mmHg. Significant reductions in the transmitted pressure were recorded from the transducers with both padding materials. With eight layers of padding, reductions in pressure of 13% (1% to 26%) and 18% (7% to 35%) were seen with Cellona and Velband, respectively. The reduction in pressure with Velband padding correlated with increasing arm circumference (Pearson’s correlation coefficient 0.711, p < 0.001). Studies to date have examined how arm circumference affects the required tourniquet inflation pressure. Our study is the first to investigate the effect of the padding and the findings suggest that using more than two layers results in a significant reduction in the transmitted pressure

During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a tourniquet is often used intraoperatively. There are proposed benefits of tourniquet use including shorter duration of surgery, improved surgical field visualization and increased cement penetration which may improve implant longevity. However, there are also cited side effects that include increased post-operative pain, slowed recovery, skin bruising, neurovascular injury and quadriceps weakness. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated no differences in implant longevity, however they are limited by short follow-up and small sample sizes. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rates of revision surgery among patients undergoing cemented TKA with or without an intraoperative tourniquet and to understand the causes and risk factors for failure. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high-volume arthroplasty centre from January 1999 to December 2010. Patients who underwent surgery without the use of a tourniquet and those who had a tourniquet inflated for the entirety of the case were included. The causes and timing of revision surgery were recorded and cross referenced with the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database to reduce the loss to follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed with the use of Kaplan-Meier curves to determine overall survival rates at final follow-up. A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to evaluate independent predictors of revision surgery. Data from 3939 cases of primary cemented TKA were available for analysis. There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used for the duration of the surgery and 1663 (42%) cases in which a tourniquet was not utilized. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years (range 0 days - 22.8 years) when censored by death or revision surgery. There were 150 recorded revisions in the entire cohort, with periprosthetic joint infection (n=50) and aseptic loosening (n=41) being the most common causes for revision. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the tourniquetless group was 93.8% at final follow-up while the cumulative survival at final follow-up for the tourniquet group was 96.9% at final follow-up. Tourniquetless surgery was an independent predictor for all-cause revision with an HR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.1, 2.1, p=0.011). Younger age and male sex were also independent factors for all cause revision. The results of the current study demonstrate higher all-cause revision rates with tourniquetless surgery in a large cohort of patients undergoing primary cemented TKA. The available literature consists of short-term trials and registry data, which have inherent limitations. Potential causes for increased revision rates in the tourniquetless group include reduced cement penetration, increased intraoperative blood loss and longer surgical. The results of the current study should be taken into consideration, alongside the known risks and benefits of tourniquet use, when considering intraoperative tourniquet use in cemented TKA

Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a subject of considerable debate. A recent study questioned the need for tourniquets based on associated risks. However, the study omitted analysis of crucial tourniquet-related parameters which have been demonstrated in numerous studies to be associated with safe tourniquet use and reduction of adverse events. The current utilization and preferences of tourniquet use in Canada remain unknown. Our primary aim was to determine the current practices, patterns of use, and opinions of tourniquet use in TKA among members of the Canadian Arthroplasty Society (CAS). Additionally, we sought to determine the need for updated best practice guidelines to inform optimal tourniquet use and to identify areas requiring further research. A self-administered survey was emailed to members of the CAS in October 2021(six-week period). The response rate was 57% (91/161). Skip logic branching was used to administer a maximum of 59 questions related to tourniquet use, beliefs, and practices. All respondents were staff surgeons and 88% were arthroplasty fellowship trained. Sixty-five percent have been in practice for ≥11 years and only 16% for 50 TKA/year, 59% have an academic practice, and >67% prefer cemented TKA. Sixty-six percent currently use tourniquets, 25% no longer do but previously did, and 9% never used tourniquets. For those not using tourniquets, the most common reasons are potential harm/risks and publications/conferences. Among current users, 48% use in all cases and an additional 37% use in 76-99% of cases. The top reason for use was improved visualization/bloodless field (88%), followed by performing a cemented TKA, used in training, and faster operative times. The main patient factor influencing selective tourniquet use was peripheral vascular disease and main surgical factors were operative duration and cementless TKA. The most frequent adverse events reported were bruising/pinching under the tourniquet and short-term pain, which majority believed were related to improper tourniquet use (prolonged time, high-pressures, poor cuff fit), yet only 8% use contoured tourniquets and 32% don't use limb protection. Despite substantial evidence in literature that tourniquet safety and probability of harm are affected by tourniquet time and pressure, only 83% and 72% of respondents believe reducing tourniquet time and pressure respectively reduce the probability of harm. In addition, no surgeon utilizes personalized limb occlusion pressure which has been demonstrated to substantially reduce tourniquet pressure while being safe and effective. Furthermore, 62% always use fixed pressure and 37% will modify the pressure based on patient parameters, most often systolic blood pressure and limb size. Almost all (88%) were interested in new evidence-based guidelines regarding these parameters. Tourniquet use in TKA remains prevalent among arthroplasty surgeons in the CAS; however tremendous practice variability regarding several key parameters required for optimal use exists. Current best practices of tourniquet use regarding personalized pressures, time, and type are not being utilized across Canada. There is considerable interest and need for further research and updated guidelines regarding key parameters of safe tourniquet usage to optimize tourniquet use in TKA

Aim. Tourniquet is widely used in extremity surgery. In order to prevent surgical site infection, correct timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis and tourniquet inflation is important. We aimed to evaluate the time for which the free drug concentration of cefuroxime is maintained above the minimal inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) in subcutaneous tissue and calcaneal cancellous bone during three clinically relevant tourniquet application scenarios. Method. Twenty-four female pigs were included. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling of cefuroxime concentrations bilaterally in calcaneal cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue, and a tourniquet cuff was applied on a randomly picked leg of each pig. Subsequently, the pigs were randomized into three groups to receive 1.5 g of cefuroxime by intravenous injection 15 min prior to tourniquet inflation (Group A), 45 min prior to tourniquet inflation (Group B), and at the tourniquet release (Group C). The tourniquet duration was 90 min in all groups. Dialysates and venous blood samples were collected eight-hours postcefuroxime administration. Results. Cefuroxime concentrations were maintained above the clinical breakpoint MIC for Staphylococcus aureus (4 µg/mL) in calcaneal cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue throughout the 90 min tourniquet duration in Group A and B. Cefuroxime administration at tourniquet release (Group C) resulted in concentrations above 4 µg/mL for a minimum of 3.5 hours in the tissues on the tourniquet side. There were no significant differences in the T>MIC (4 µg/mL) in subcutaneous tissue or calcaneal cancellous bone between the three groups. However, Group A tended toward shorter T>MIC in tourniquet calcaneal cancellous bone compared to Group C (p=0.08). Conclusions. Administration of cefuroxime (1.5 g) in the 15–45 min window prior to tourniquet inflation resulted in sufficient calcaneal cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue concentrations throughout the 90 min tourniquet application. If the target is to maintain postoperative cefuroxime concentrations above relevant MIC values, our results suggest that a second dose of cefuroxime should be administered at tourniquet release

Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is convenient for the surgeon and provides a bloodless field for expeditious surgery and a dry field for cementation, but can best be described as an orthopaedic tradition. It is logical for complex anatomy of ligament, nerve, and vessel surgery but it may not be necessary for TKA. In one recent randomised trial, the absence of the tourniquet was not found to affect the quality of cement fixation. There are numerous potential downsides to the use of a tourniquet including decrease range of motion, delayed recovery, increased pain, wound complications, micro-emboli, neuropathy, and increased VTE. There are also a number of complications associated with the use of a tourniquet including arterial thrombosis, skin irritation below the tourniquet, post-operative hyperemia, blood loss, less accurate intra-operative assessment, and it complicates intravenous drug administration. Studies of range of motion have shown that when there is a difference noted, the range of motion is consistently better without tourniquet use. When a tourniquet is utilised it has been found to be advantageous to only use the tourniquet for a minimal amount of the case, typically when cementing is performed. Functional strength has also been found to be improved without the use of a tourniquet. In a recent randomised trial, tourniquet use was associated with decreased quad strength at 3 weeks that persisted at 3 months. This was attributed to muscle damage, tourniquet-induced ischemia, and compressive injury. Increased peri-operative pain has also been reported in randomised trials associated with the use of a tourniquet. Edema, swelling, and limb girth issues have also been noted to be associated with tourniquet use. Exsanguinating a limb will result in swelling approximately 10% of the original volume half due to a return of blood, and half due to reactive hyperemia. Longer tourniquet times are also associated with increased wound drainage and more wound hypoxia as measured by transcutaneous oxygen levels. Tourniquet use has also been associated with embolic phenomenon with several times greater risk of large emboli. In one study where quantitative MRI was utilised on both thighs after unilateral total knee replacement with and without a tourniquet, the tourniquet group showed more atrophy with a loss of 20% of the volume compared to the normal side in total knees performed with a tourniquet which also performed clinically worse. There is a small but substantial risk of arterial thrombosis particularly in patients that have atherosclerotic plaque. Ironically there is a risk of increased post-operative blood loss due to the post-tourniquet “blush” as the blood pressure and pain increase hours after a surgical procedure is completed. There is also difficulty in identifying and coagulating posterior and lateral geniculate vessels with the components in place. Utilizing a tourniquet also interferes with intra-operative assessment of patella tracking, range of motion, ligament stability, and gap balancing. Randomised clinical trials have concluded that there is less pain and quicker recovery without the use of a tourniquet. There have also been reports of less swelling, increased range of motion, less analgesic use and better clinical outcome when a tourniquet is not utilised. A meta-analysis of systematic reviews favored not utilizing a tourniquet due to the decrease in complication rate and the improvement in clinical results. While it is standard practice in the US to utilise a tourniquet, the strong consensus of the literature on the subject favors either not using a tourniquet or minimizing the use of a tourniquet for the period of time necessary for a very dry field for cement fixation

A tourniquet is usually used during ankle arthroscopy to allow for improved visibility and reduced operation time. However, clinical studies on knee arthroscopy have not demonstrated this to be true. In addition, Zengerink and van Dijk emphasized a limited tourniquet time in ankle arthroscopy as a possible factor to lower the complication rate even more. The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to examine the effect of tourniquet use on arthroscopic visualization, operative time, postoperative intra-articular bleeding, postoperative pain scores and outcome of anterior ankle arthroscopy. A consecutive series of 50 patients who were scheduled for anterior ankle arthroscopy were randomized to have the surgery done either without the tourniquet inflated (25 patients) or with the tourniquet inflated (25 patients). The patients were evaluated by the course of the surgery, postoperative intra-articular bleeding, pain during the early postoperative period and by using the subjective and objective functional scores to evaluate the condition of the ankle before and 3 and 6 months after the surgery. The statistical analysis was performed with the normality of distribution tested by both Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Appropriate parametric or non-parametric methods were then used to test statistical hypotheses, while the statistical significance (alpha, Type I error) was set at .05. Fourty-nine patients were present at the final follow-up, 6 months after the surgery. The results between the groups were comparable regarding the duration of the operative procedure, consumption of sterile saline, visualisation and functional scores. Notable difference between the groups in favour of the non-tourniquet group was present regarding postoperative bleeding, but was not statistically significant. Statistically significant difference in favour of the non-tourniquet group was found regarding postoperative pain during several days in the early postoperative period. Our study has shown that anterior ankle arthroscopy may be performed adequately without the use of a tourniquet and that it has the same operative course as in cases in which the tourniquet is used and functional outcomes which are not worse than in cases in which the tourniquet is used

Over a two-year period, 265 Norwegian orthopaedic surgeons working at 71 institutions performed 63 484 operations under a tourniquet. Their replies to a questionnaire revealed that they mostly followed modern guidelines in their use of the tourniquet. Most felt that the tourniquet could be left on for two hours, and that it could be re-applied after 15 minutes. A total of 26 complications (one in 2442 operations) that might have been due to the tourniquet were reported, of which 15 were neurological. Three were in the upper limb (one in 6155 operations) and 12 in the lower limb (one in 3752 operations). Two were permanent (one in 31742 operations), but the remainder resolved within six months. One permanent and one transient complication occurred after tourniquet times of three hours. The incidence of tourniquet complications is still at least as high as that estimated in the 1970s

In this study patients were randomized between surgeon chosen pressure (control) and an automatically determined tourniquet pressure(study group). Of 112 patients in the study group, 5% failed to obtain an automatic pressure. Of the remainder, the average tourniquet pressure was 198 +/− 20.2 mm Hg compared to 259.6 +/− 4.4 mmHg for the control group (p<0.0001). Of the study group 94 (88.6%) had good to excellent fields compared to the control group where 100 (77.5%) had good to excellent fields (p<0.05). The automatic measurement of limb occlusion pressure results in better operative fields at a lower pressure

Recent emphasis in total knee arthroplasty has been on accelerated rehabilitation and recovery. Minimally invasive and quadriceps sparing techniques have been developed to expediate return to normal function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the tourniquet on post-operative pain and quadriceps function in total knee arthroplasty. This study involved a randomised, blinded, prospective trial of 20 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon. All patients received a general anaesthetic, identical prosthesis and post-operative protocol. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two group: (a) tourniquet group or (b) no tourniquet group. A standard surgical tourniquet was applied to all patients but only inflated in the tourniquet group. Outcomes included Oxford knee scores, post-operative pain scores, post-operative drainage and transfusion requirements, thigh and knee circumference measurements, range of motion, and surface EMG measurements at intervals of two weeks, six weeks, six months and twelve months. The study included 16 male and four female patients with 11 right and nine left knees. There was no significant difference pre-operatively between groups in age, degree of deformity or range of motion. There was no significant difference detected between Oxford knee scores up to twelve months, days to discharge, post-operative drainage and range of motion. However, the pain scores were significantly higher in the tourniquet group. Surface EMG as a measurement of quadriceps activation showed a significant difference between the groups and between time points. The no tourniquet group can support more energy in their quads muscle than the tourniquet group. The use of a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty has no effect on overall knee function at twelve months as measured by the Oxford knee score and range of motion; however tourniquet use results in higher initial pain scores and reduction in quadriceps function as measured by surface EMG

INTRODUCTION. The efficacy and safety of the tourniquet are discussed, in particular with regard to the blood saving and tissue damage induced by ischemia. The quality of exsanguination and tissue necrosis in the compression zone are significant prognostic factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new tourniquet system combining efficient and controlled exsanguination (figure 1) and ischemia maintained by pressure on a minimal surface (figure 2). The hypothesis tested was that the new system allowed tourniquet to reduce blood loss compared to conventional withers without increasing the risk of complications. MATERIAL. Two groups of 30 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were compared. There were 39 women and 21 men with a mean age of 67 years and a mean BMI of 34. The study group was operated with the innovative tourniquet and followed prospectively. The control group was operated with the traditional tourniquet and analyzed retrospectively. METHODS. Operating time was measured between skin incision and dressing application. Blood loss was calculated with the Gross formula. Blood transfusion requirements were collected. Rehabilitation course was appreciated by the time to discharge. Complications, whether related or not to the tourniquet used, were recorded. Data were compared in both groups with the appropriate statistical tests at a 0.05 level of significance. The sample size was calculated to allow detecting a 300 ml decrease in mean blood loss with a power of 0.80. RESULTS. Both groups were comparable for all pre-operative data (age, gender, BMI, severity of the pre-operative deformation, pre-operative hematocrit level). Calculated blood loss was not significant different in the two groups (968 ml in the study group versus 1,022 ml in the control group, p<0.05). Operating time was not significantly decreased in the study group. Blood transfusion requirements were not significant different in the two groups (4 units versus 6 units). The complication rate was significantly decreased in the study group (no case versus 4 cases), especially for skin complications (3 cases of persistent bleeding or skin ischemia in the study group). The mean discharge time was significantly shorter in the study group (3rd post-operative day versus 5th post-operative day, p<0.05). DISCUSSION. The tested hypothesis was not confirmed. This preliminary study did not show any advantage of the new technology of tourniquet when analyzing blood loss. However, the decreased rate of local skin complications may be in relationship with a decreased intra-operative skin ischemia. This might lead to an earlier discharge. CONCLUSION. A prospective, randomized study is necessary to confirm these preliminary results

Introduction. Tourniquets have been used for many years during total knee arthroplasty as a means of achieving a bloodless field for better visualization and cement-bond inter-digitation. Controversy has surrounded the necessity for a tourniquet in past years. There are many advantages and disadvantages to using a tourniquet, and one prominent disadvantage is a purported increase in post-operative pain and limitations in range of motion. Objective. This study examined the literature for assessment of pain and analgesia usage in post-operative patient who have either received no tourniquet during surgery or received variations in both timing and pressure. Secondary outcomes included were functional in nature, namely range of motion and post-operative hospital stay. Methods. Three hundred and nineteen articles were searched and narrowed to 6 using the QUORUM approach. All were randomized, controlled trials with specific exclusion criteria. Results. When analyzing each trial, pain did not seem to be significantly lower in those with no tourniquet. Instead, patients who received lower pressures for only a portion of the surgery had lower pain levels. Range of motion was consistently higher in the non-tourniquet groups compared to the tourniquet patients in all studies that included this measure. There was no difference in hospital stay within the groups for each trial. Conclusion. Our conclusion is that this question is not as straightforward as originally perceived. Patients who receive tourniquet compression up until cementation at lower cuff pressures using a wider cuff may be at an advantage in their post-operatively outcomes

Background. Tourniquets and tranexamic acid (TXA) are commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but there is not consensus on how these interventions affect blood transfusion rates and total blood loss. Few studies examine the combined use of both interventions. We compared outcome measures and transfusion rates following TKA, with and without the use of tourniquet and TXA. Methods. Retrospective cohort study of 477 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA at a single center between 2008 and 2013. There were 243 in the tourniquet-assisted (TA) and 234 in the tourniquet-unassisted (TU) group. Subanalysis was performed on those patients receiving TXA. Results. Mean operative duration was 66.4 minutes (30–135) in the TA group and 87.5 minutes (43–162) in the TU group (p<0.0001). Mean post-operative drop in hemoglobin was significantly greater in TU group (3.1g/dl vs. 2.8g/dl, p=0.002). The transfusion rate was 9.5% in TA compared to 11.5% in TU patients (p=0.46) with comparable mean units transfused (2.6 vs. 2.2, p=0.30). There was no significant difference in rate of wound infection (2% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.82) and total complication rate (4.1% vs. 2.5%, p=0.19) between groups. Mean length of stay was 5.8 days in TA and 7 days in the TU group (p=0.07). Those patients given TXA had a lower hemoglobin drop (2.6g/dl vs. 3.3g/dl, p=0.04) with similar transfusion (10.9% vs. 13.3%, p=0.61) and complication (3.3% vs. 5.2%, p=0.95) rates. Discussion. Tourniquet-unassisted TKA had a greater operative duration and post-operative drop in hemoglobin than tourniquet-assisted TKA. However, transfusion rates were similar between groups. TXA use reduced the operative decrease in hemoglobin with no effect on complication or transfusion rates. Key words. TKA, tourniquet, tranexamic acid, transfusion rates, outcomes. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with significant blood loss, for which blood transfusion might be necessary. The role of the tourniquet is controversial, though it is widely used by orthopedic surgeons. Its use was believed to be effective in decreasing intraoperative blood loss and creating a bloodless surgical field, which theoretically would facilitate the cementing technique and other surgical procedures. However, reactive blood flow reached its peak within five minutes after the tourniquet had been released. The tourniquet controls intraoperative blood loss, but cannot stop postoperative blood loss. Patients who were managed with a tourniquet during the operation often complained of thigh pain. This was possibly caused by the direct pressure of an inflated tourniquet on the nerves and local soft tissues. Limb swelling and increased soft tissue tension caused by reactive hyperperfusion after tourniquet deflation may also contribute to the wound pain. The aim of our study is to investigate the effect of tourniquet on blood loss and soft tissue damage in TKA. Materials & Methods. In this prospective, randomized study, 72 patients with primary cemented knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to two groups (with and without tourniquet). The operation time, blood loss, post-operative hemoglobin, hematocrit, markers of soft tissue damage (myoglobin, Cretine Posphokinase(CK), LDH, GOT, Creatinine), status of rehabilitation, knee pain and thigh pain were monitored until discharge. Results. The intra-operative and total blood loss is more in non-tourniquet. The post-operative levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit were significant higher in tourniquet group until postoperative day 4. Using tourniquet also shortened the operation time. Patients managed without tourniquet showed higher CK level in postoperative day 2. The severity of knee pain was similar in both group. Mild thigh pain was noted in tourniquet group. Conclusions. Our randomized controlled trial revealed that the usage od tourniquet in TKA may save blood and save time with minor adverse effect. Without using tourniquet, the prolonged surgical time and excessive hemostasis may cause more soft tissue damage

Introduction. Haemorrhage is the main cause of preventable death on the modern battlefield. As Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) in Afghanistan become increasingly powerful, more proximal limb injuries are occurring. Significant concerns now exist about the ability of the windlass Combat Application Tourniquet to control distal haemorrhage following mid-thigh application. Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of the CAT windlass tourniquet in comparison to the newer pneumatic Emergency Military Tourniquet (EMT). Method. Serving soldiers were recruited from a military orthopaedic outpatient clinic. Participants' age, Body Mass Index and blood pressure were recorded and a short medical history obtained to exclude any arteriopathic conditions. Doppler ultrasound was used to identify the popliteal pulses bilaterally. The CAT was randomly self-applied by the participant at mid-thigh level and the presence or absence of the popliteal pulse on Doppler was recorded. This process was repeated on the contra lateral leg with the CAT now applied by a trained researcher. Finally, the EMT tourniquet was applied to the first leg and the presence of a popliteal pulse on Doppler recorded again. Results. 50 consecutive patients were invited to participate in the study. 15 declined to participate. 1 was excluded via pre-determined exclusion criteria. A total of 24 participants were recruited. The self applied CAT occluded popliteal flow in only 4 subjects (16.6%). The CAT applied by a researcher occluded popliteal flow in 2 subjects (8.3%). The EMT prevented popliteal flow in 18 subjects (75%). Statistical analysis demonstrated significance in the performance difference between the two tourniquets (p=0.001), but no significant difference between the two applications of the CAT (p=0.25). The BMI and systolic BP were significantly higher in those patients in whom the EMT failed (p=0.01 & p=0.04 respectively). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the CAT tourniquet is ineffective in controlling arterial blood flow when applied at mid-thigh level. The EMT was successful in a significantly larger number of participants, and its failures may be related to increased BMI and systolic pressure

Purpose. Recently many authors have questioned the role of tourniquets in primary knee arthroplasty (TKA). Meanwhile, whether the use of an intra-articular wound drainage is an advance over the lack of a drain in TKA is controversial in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of drainage or not in TKA without a tourniquet. Methods. Eighty participants who underwent primary unilateral TKA were prospectively enrolled and were randomized to one of two techniques during surgery without a tourniquet: drainage (Group A) or non-drainage (Group B). Blood loss was monitored perioperatively. The operating time, allogeneic blood transfusion rate, thigh pain, knee pain, limb swelling, clinical outcome as measured by the hospital for special surgery (HSS) score, the ability to straight-leg raise, visual analog scale (VAS) in pain, length of stay and knee active range of motion (ROM) were also recorded. The digital radiographs taken at 6 months postoperatively were assessed for cement mantle thickness and radiolucency using the Knee Society radiographic zones. Results. The mean Haemoglobin levels on day one and three postoperative were significantly higher in Group B (112.1±10.6 mg/dL, 99.5±9.6 mg/dL) than in Group A (106.1±12.4 mg/dL, 92.7±13.1 mg/dL) (P=0.026, P=0.011). Blood or blood product transfusion was necessary for thirteen patients in Group A (33.3%) whereas five patients of Group B (13.1%) were in need of blood products, the difference was significant (P=0.036). The total blood loss in Group A was significant more than Group B (597.7 ± 331.6ml vs. 496.1 ± 260.8ml, P=0.012). Among the patients in Group B, haemarthrosis developed in 3 knees (7.9%, P=0.23). Calf circumference measurements of both groups showed a significant difference at postoperative day one (3.2% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.012) as well as day two (4.9% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.07). A superficial wound infection was detected within 3 months after surgery in 3 knees (7.6%) in Group A, whereas no superficial wound infection was observed in Group B, the difference between groups did not reached statistical significance (P=0.248). The difference in VAS score of knee active pain between groups on postoperative day three, five and three weeks were statistically significant (P=0.012, P=0.003, P=0.008). There were no differences in terms of surgical time, thigh/knee rest pain scores, discharge/post-op three weeks HSS score, range of motion, ambulation time, straight-leg raising rate, knee/ thigh circumference, length of stay, cement mantle thickness, or the presence of radiolucency. Conclusions. Drainage does not exhibit substantial advantages in promoting post-operative rehabilitation after uncomplicated TKA, compared with non-drainage. On the other hand, it might increase blood loss and wound complication. Therefore, we believe that it is safe and beneficial for our patients to routinely perform uncomplicated TKA without a postoperative drain if the procedure is done without a tourniquet. On condition that prolonged operation time, multiple extra bone cutting, operative outside joint capsule, we still recommend placing a drainage tube

Tourniquet use in TKA is common practice. A recent meta-analysis concluded that whilst early release (prior to closure of the quadriceps mechanism) increases blood loss, it protects patients from complications. However, there has been no research evaluating tourniquet use during cement fixation only. This study proposed to establish whether tourniquet application during cement fixation only (Short Duration) was associated with better functional recovery compared to standard tourniquet (Long Duration) application during TKA. We planned to randomise 230 patients to receive Short or Long Duration tourniquet application. The primary outcomes were in-hospital donor transfusion rate and the Oxford Knee Score at 10 weeks post-surgery. Serial measures (pre-operative, day 4 then 2, 10, 26 and 52 weeks post-operation) of knee range and function were undertaken. Pre- and post-operative Doppler ultrasounds were obtained. The trial was discontinued after randomisation of 65 patients. Interim analysis indicated the risk of transfusion (odds ratio 7.38, P = 0.015) was higher in the Short Duration group. At 10 weeks post-surgery, no significant difference was observed in Oxford Knee Score. There were no between-group differences in rate of recovery up to 26 weeks for any outcome. We conclude that restricting tourniquet application to the period of cementing is associated with a significantly higher risk of transfusion. This approach is impractical if it is not offset by very impressive gains in functional recovery

Background. Although tourniquets are widely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), their influence on the postoperative course is still unclear. In addition, tourniquet-related soft tissue damage is a major concern in daily practice. We performed a prospective, randomized controlled trial to clarify the role of tourniquets in TKA. Methods. Seventy-two patients undergoing TKA were randomly allocated to a tourniquet or non-tourniquet group. Changes in C-reactive protein, creatine phosphokinase, and other indicators of soft tissue damage were monitored preoperatively and postoperatively on days 1, 2, and 4. Rehabilitation progress was also recorded for comparison. Results. Patients in the tourniquet group showed smaller increases in C-reactive protein (peak values: 175 ± 55 versus 139 ± 75 mg/dl) and creatine phosphokinase (peak values: 214 ± 89 versus 162 ± 104 U/l) compared those in the non-tourniquet group. There was slightly less postoperative pain in the non-tourniquet group, and no significant differences in swelling, or rehabilitation progress. Conclusions. Using tourniquets in TKA was effective for reducing blood loss and avoiding excessive postoperative inflammation and muscle damage. Tourniquets caused slightly more postoperative pain but did not affect postoperative recovery

Introduction. To reduce several disadvantages many surgeons are not using tourniquet in TKA. Here we compared functional outcome along with pain and blood loss in sixty patients. Material and Method. 60 patients who underwent TKA wererandomized into a tourniquet group (n2 = 30) and a non-tourniquet group (n1 = 30). All operations were performed by the samesurgeon and follow-up was for 6 month. Primary outcomes werefunctional and clinical outcomes, as evaluated by KSS and postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes were blood loss, surgical time and visibility, extensor lag and Knee ROM, DVT and radiolucency. Result. Without significant difference in operating time, there was significant less VAS score on post operative day 0, 1 and 3(P-value=0.0,.0.01,0.03 respectively) and significantly greater number of patient were able to achieve straight leg raise on Post operative day 3 with significantly better range of motion in post operative day 3 and 5 in non-tourniquet group. Neither intraoperative blood loss nor drain nor calculated blood loss was significantly different. Functional outcome was similar in both groups on third month and sixth month. Conclusion. There was no difference in functional outcome in two groups till 6 month with no radiolucency seen till 6 month. This study shows use of tourniquet related to increase thigh and limb pain and delay in rehabilitation in early post-operative period with no difference after 5 days has better intra-operative visuality and no risk of DVT and nerve palsy

Blood loss is a major concern in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) along with postoperative knee function. The present study explores the impact of tourniquet and closed-suction drains on blood loss as well as knee function in TKA. A prospective clinical trial was conducted on 111 patients admitted for TKA. Subjects were divided into three groups based on duration of tourniquet use (T+: whole-course tourniquet, T-: cementation only tourniquet) and usage of closed-suction drain (D+: drain use, D-: no drain). Thirty-six subjects were included in group T+D+, 42 in T-D+ and 33 in T-D-. Data from study population was analysed for pre and post-operative hemoglobin level (Hb), perioperative and total blood loss, blood transfusion rates, knee range of motion (ROM), and pain level assessment. Direct and indirect costs associated to nursing time and drains were calculated. Results are presented in mean ± SD. No statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups (T+D+, T-D+ and T-D-) concerning total blood lost (calculated using Gross' formula), Hb levels over the first six postoperative weeks, blood transfusion rates and intra-articular hematomas. Intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced in T+ subjects compared to T- subjects (100 ± 88 mL vs. 279 ± 235 mL respectively, p < 0.001), yet length of surgery was unaffected by the different tourniquet inflation strategies. Hidden blood loss was lower in D+ subjects compared to D- subjects (1161 ± 554 mL vs. 1667 ± 554 mL respectively, p < 0.001), but it was compensated by the blood loss in the drains. Early post operative ROM (flexion: 79.1 ± 14.8°, extension: −5.0 ± 6.7°) was superior in group T-D- compared to group T+D+ (flexion: 71.9 ± 17.1°, p = 0.071°; extension: −9.9 ± 6.4°, p = 0.004). Nevertheless, ROM six weeks postoperative was not statistically different between groups (flexion: 114.0 ± 13.3°, extension: 0.4 ± 5.2°). Patient-reported postoperative pain was also similar in all groups. Nursing time dedicated to drain management was 30 min/patient (330h total for 660 patients/year). Total costs related to drains were $31.92CAD/patient ($21,067CAD total for 660 patients/year). Our results suggest that whole-course tourniquet and closed-suction drain use in TKA do not yield beneficial results in total blood loss, blood transfusion rates, complication rates and knee rehabilitation. Their clinical relevance in TKA is questionable. Moreover, nursing time and costs related to drains should have been allocated elsewhere in patient care