A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the long term results of surgically excised wrist ganglia over a six year period between January 1998 and March 2005.

The study involved patients who had undergone ganglion surgery around the wrist joint who were contacted by telephone and on whom a follow-up questionnaire was performed. The study included 117 patients with a mean follow up period of 4.2 years (range 1.5 – 8.7 years). There were 40 (34%) dorsal and 77 (66%) volar ganglia. The recurrence rate for surgically excised dorsal ganglia was 32.5% and for volar ganglia was 46.8%. Recurrence occurred in 58% of patients who had previously had their ganglion aspirated. The overall risk of developing a moderate to severely tender scar was 19% and an unsightly scar 9%. In those patients with recurrence of their ganglia, this was 33% and 8% respectively. Despite 49 patients experiencing recurrence, 24 were still satisfied with their treatment and 30 patients would still choose surgical treatment again knowing the risk of recurrence

This study questions the effectiveness of surgery in the treatment of wrist ganglia in that recurrence rates are similar to rates seen in studies merely observing or aspirating ganglia. Not only does one have to question the surgical risks that are undertaken but also the demands on healthcare resources.

Purpose: We report a new pathological entity involving the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). In this entity, the hypertrophic LHBT becomes incarcerated in the joint during limb elevation, leading to shoulder pain and blockage.

Material and methods: Twenty-one patients were identified. These patients presented hypertrophy of the intra-articular portion of the LHBT with tendon incarceration at limb elevation. The diagnosis was confirmed during open surgery (n=14) or arthroscopy (n=7). All cases were diagnosed in patients with an associated cuff tear. Treatment consisted in resection of the intra-articular portion of the LHBT and appropriate treatment of the cuff.

Results: All patients had anterior shoulder pain and deficient anterior flexion because of the incarcerated tendon. An intra-operative dynamic test consisted in raising the arm with the elbow extended, providing objective proof of the tendon trapped in the articulation in all cases. The positive “hour glass” test produce a fold then incarceration of the tendon between the humeral head and the glenoid cavity. Tendon resection after tenodesis (n=19) or biopolar tenotomy (n=2) yielded immediate recovery of passive complete anterior flexion. The Constant score improved from 38 points preoperatively to 76 points at last follow-up.

Discussion: The “hour glass” long biceps tendon is caused by hypertrophy of the intra-articular portion of the tendon which becomes unable to glide in the bicipital groove during anterior arm flexion. 10°–20° defective motion, pain at the level of the bicipital groove, and images of a hypertrophic tendon are good diagnostic signs. The “hour glass” LGBT must not be confused with retractile capsulitis. The definitive diagnosis is obtained at surgery with the “hour glass” test which shows a fold and incarceration of the tendon during anterior flexion with an extended elbow. Simple tenotomy is insufficient to resolve the blockage. The intra-articular portion of the tendon must be resected after bipolar tenotomy or tenodesis.

Conclusion: Systematic search for “hour glass” LHBT should be undertaken in patients with persistent anterior shoulder pain of unexplained origin associated with deficient anterior arm flexion.

Purpose: The purpose of our work was to report causes and results of treatment of anterior shoulder instability after implantation of a shoulder prosthesis.

Material and methods: This retrospective multicentric study included 51 patients with prosthetic anterior instability: 42 patients after first-intention shoulder prosthesis and nine after prosthesis revision. There were 39 women (79%) and 12 men, mean age 67 years, who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (n=29, 57%) or hemiarthro-plasty (n=22, 43%). Thirty-eight patients (75%) had prosthetic dislocation and 13 (25%) subluxation associated with pain an loss of anterior elevation. The initial prosthesis was implanted for degenerative disease (n=29), rheumatoid arthritis (n=7), or fracture (n=15). Anterior prosthetic instability occurred early in 23 shoulders (first six weeks) and lat in 28 shoulders (7 after trauma, 21 without trauma). Conservative treatment by reduction-immobilisation was performed in 16 cases and prosthetic revision in 35. The patients were reviewed radiographically at mean 41 months follow-up (range 24–62).

Results: Subscapular tear or incompetence was the main cause of prosthetic anterior instability, observed in 87% of the cases. Technical errors concerning the prosthesis were also observed: oversized head, malrotation of the prosthesis. Associated complications were frequent: glenoid loosening (24%), polyethylene dissociation from the metal glenoid implant (10%), infection (10%), humeral fracture (4%). The final Constant score was 54 points and 55% of the patients were disappointed or dissatisfied. None of the shoulders were stable after consevative treatment. The prosthetic revision provided disappointing results with 51% recurrent anterior instability.

Discussion: Anterior instability of shoulder prostheses is a serious complication which responds poorly to treatment. Loosening of the subscapular suture is the main cause.

Purpose: Consolidation of the tuberosity is the key to success of shoulder arthroplasty for fracture. The purpose of this study was to assess the number and causes of tuberosity complications in order to find solutions for this problem.

Material and methods: This retrospective multicentric study included 334 shoulder prostheses implanted for fracture between 1991 and 2000. Two different prostheses were used: 300 standard Aequalis prostheses implanted between 1991 and 1997 (mean follow-up four years) and 31 Aequalis Fracture prosthesis between 1999 and 2000 (mean follow-up nine months). Radiological results were assessed on the postoperative and last follow-up x-rays. The Constant score was used for clinical assessment.

Results: For the 300 standard prostheses, the Constant score was 54 points with active anterior elevation = 104°. For the 31 fracture prostheses, the Constant score was 58 points with active anterior elevation = 114°. According to the operator’s assessment, 49% of the postoperative radiological results were fair or poor and objectively 35% of the tuberosities were poorly positioned with the standard prosthesis and 22% with the fracture prosthesis. Twenty-six percent of the good or poorly positioned tuberosities migrated secondarily with the standard prosthesis and 10% with the fracture prosthesis. Statistically significant prognostic factors limiting tuberosity complications were: satisfactory initial osteosynthesis with correct prosthesis height and retroversion facilitated by use of the fracture system, rehabilitation in a specialised centre, relative immobilisation during the first postoperative month limiting exercises to balancing movements which divided the number of secondary migrations by two compared with immediate moblisation (14% versus 27%).

Discussion: A precise analysis of the radiograms revealed a very high rate of tuberosity complications (50%). There has been little study of these complications which are underestimated in the literature. The Aequalis fracture prosthesis can reduce these tuberosity complications two-fold. Postoperative immobilisation also reduces two-fold tuberosity migrations. These observations are against the early passive motion advocated by Neer. Finally, the quality of tuberosity fixation is crucial for success. The surgeon must concentrate on this element, searching to achieve a perfectly positioned prosthesis on the peroperative x-ray.