Aims

The aim of this study was to produce clinical consensus recommendations about the non-surgical treatment of children with Perthes’ disease. The recommendations are intended to support clinical practice in a condition for which there is no robust evidence to guide optimal care.

Aims

The mean age of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has reduced with time. Younger patients have increased expectations following TKA. Aseptic loosening of the tibial component is the most common cause of failure of TKA in the UK. Interest in cementless TKA has re-emerged due to its encouraging results in the younger patient population. We review a large series of tantalum trabecular metal cementless implants in patients who are at the highest risk of revision surgery.

Aims

Due to widespread cancellations in elective orthopaedic procedures, the number of patients on waiting list for surgery is rising. We aim to determine and quantify if disparities exist between inpatient and day-case orthopaedic waiting list numbers; we also aim to determine if there is a ‘hidden burden’ that already exists due to reductions in elective secondary care referrals.

To assess whether prosthetic femoral stem centralisers have a detrimental effect on the macroporosity of the cement mantle, and if so, whether this is independent of their design and the rate of implantation, 30 identically cast moulded prosthetic femora were divided into 3 groups. Group 1: no centraliser (control), Group 2: centraliser A and Group 3: centraliser B. Using third generation cementation techniques and pressure monitoring, Charnley C-stems +/− the appropriate centraliser were implanted to a constant depth. Half in each group were implanted as rapidly as possible and the other half over 90 seconds. The stems were removed and the cement mantle then underwent a preliminary arthroscopic examination prior to being sectioned transversely at 3 constant levels. Each level was then photographed and digitally enlarged to a known scale to allow examination and determination of any cement voids (macropores) surface area.

There were no significant pressure fluctuations between the groups. Preliminary arthroscopic examination revealed that cement voids appeared more common when a centraliser was used. This difference was confirmed (p=0.002) following sectioning of the specimens, with cement voids found in 85% of femora when a centraliser was used and only 20% in the control group. Centraliser B performed worst with cement voids of a larger volume and more frequent occurrence (p=0.002). The macroporosity of the cement mantle was independent of the rate of implantation (p=0.39).

The use of femoral stem centralisers is helpful in preventing malposition of the implant but results in increased macroporosity of the cement mantle. This may have implications regarding the longevity of an implant in terms of early loosening and therefore their design and use must always be carefully considered.

Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of a mini-incision surgical (MIS) approach to knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to a traditional standard approach.

Background: TKA through less invasive approaches have become increasingly popular in recent years. These range from smaller skin incisions to the ‘quadriceps-sparing’ procedures. Claims of improved recovery time and other clinical/economic advantages have been tempered by concerns about the safety of such procedures. This study was designed to evaluate any potential advantages of a specific approach (MIS) whilst studying peri-operative, radiological and outcome data to examine procedural safety.

Patients and Methods: 80 patients undergoing TKA were randomised to a standard or MIS (mini-midvastus) approach. The latter involved patella subluxation, rather than eversion. The operative, anaesthetic and post-operative treatments were standardised including rehabilitation protocols. Strict discharge criteria were established and independently verified and patients were discharged directly to their homes capable of independent care. Specifically the study evaluated patient demographics, operative time, blood loss and hospital stay. Outcome data including Knee Society Scores, Oxford Knee Scores and SF36 were recorded regularly in the early recovery period and up to 1 year post-operatively. Independent radiological review of implant positioning and alignment was obtained.

Results: There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, or other intra-operative data. Accelerated discharge was achieved in both groups (compared to historic data), however the length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter in the MIS patients (mean – 3.5 days compared with 4.4 days in the standard patients). There was no statistical difference in clinical outcome analyses between the groups.

Discussion: Less invasive approaches to TKA have been reported over recent years but most studies have been anecdotal comparing patient recovery with historic controls which potentially can exaggerate clinical and economic benefits. Concerns have also been raised regarding the safety of these modified procedures. This study demonstrates a reduction in hospital stay and recovery in all patients as a result of accelerated rehabilitation. The MIS patients benefited from an additional significant reduction length of stay compared to controls with no evidence of compromise in terms of safety or efficacy.

Conclusions: This study has demonstrated the safety of the MIS mini-midvastus approach and a clear reduction in hospital length of stay. MIS surgery can offer substantial clinical and economic benefits but procedures must be closely evaluated to ensure equivalent or enhanced outcomes are achieved.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), as a primary procedure and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) have been used to treat complex intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. The failure rate after ORIF is high and TEA has often been used as a salvage procedure. Although satisfactory results have been reported after TEA as a primary procedure, there are no publications reporting the results of TEA after failed internal fixation (FIF). In this study we compared the results of patients that had TEA after FIF with those that had had primary arthroplasty (PA). We reviewed the results of 9 consecutive patients who had FIF with 12 patients who had PA. All the operations were performed by one surgeon using the same technique and same prosthesis. Both groups of patients were similar with respect to ages, sex, co-morbidity and hand dominance. The mean follow-up for both groups of patients was 5 years. At final review, patients who had had FIF had a mean Mayo score of 68 and a range of flexion/extension of 90 degrees, there was 1 infection and 1 case of loosening. The PA group had a mean Mayo score of 88 and a range of flexion/extension of 96 degrees, there were no cases of infection or loosening. This study shows the results of TEA are satisfactory either as a PA or after FIF, however the results after PA are significantly better than after FIF.

Introduction: This study examined the cohort of patients selectively screened over a 5 year period with ultrasonography according to our risk factors (positive Ortolani or Barlow manoeuvre, breech presentation, first degree affected relative and talipes equinovarus) for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH). The aims were to evaluate the success of those managed in a Pavlik harness and identify predictive factors for those that failed treatment.

Methods: 1181 patients were selectively screened between 1999 and 2004. Of those, 128 patients (189 hips) were identified as having hip instability. Failure was defined as inability to achieve or maintain hip reduction in a Pavlik harness. A proforma was designed to document patients’ risk factors and ultrasound findings at time of initial dynamic ultrasound scan where the senior radiographer and treating consultant were present. Each hip was classified according to Graf type. Acetabular indices were recorded prior to discharge.

Results: All 128 patients with hip instability were managed in a Pavlik harness. This was abandoned for surgical treatment in 9 patients (10 hips) giving a failure rate of 5.3 % (0.17 per 1000 live births). All those successfully managed had an acetabular index of less than 30 degrees at follow up (6 – 48 months). 7 hips in the series were classified as Graf type IV, of these, 6 went on to fail management in a Pavlik harness. 67% of those that failed were also breech presentation compared to 22% of those managed successfully. There were no complications associated with management in a Pavlik harness. 16 patients born within our region presented after 12 weeks of age with DDH resulting in a late presentation rate of 0.3 per 1000 live births.

Discussion: Our overall rate of selective screening is 14 per 1000 live births with a subsequent treatment rate of 2.3 per 1000 is comparable with other centres. Our rate of failure for DDH in a Pavlik harness 0.17 per 1000 live births is an improvement on any previously published results. Irreducible hips, Graf type IV hips and breech presentation correlated with a high likelihood of treatment failure.

Introduction: This study examined the cohort of patients selectively screened over a 5 year period with ultrasonography according to our risk factors (positive Ortolani or Barlow manoeuvre, breech presentation, first degree affected relative and talipes equinovarus) for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH). The aims were to evaluate the success of those managed in a Pavlik harness and identify predictive factors for those that failed treatment.

Methods: 728 patients were selectively screened between 1999 and 2004. Of those, 128 patients (189 hips) were identified as having hip instability. Failure was defined as inability to achieve or maintain hip reduction in a Pavlik harness. A proforma was designed to document patients’ risk factors and ultrasound findings at time of initial dynamic ultrasound scan where the senior radiographer and treating consultant were present. Each hip was classified according to Graf type. Acetabular indices were recorded prior to discharge.

Results: All 128 patients with hip instability were managed in a Pavlik harness. This was abandoned for surgical treatment in 9 patients (10 hips) giving a failure rate of 5.3 %. All those successfully managed had an acetabular index of less than 30 degrees at follow up (6 – 48 months). 7 hips in the series were classified as Graf type IV, of these, 6 went on to fail management in a Pavlik harness. 67% of those that failed were also breech presentation compared to 22% of those managed successfully. There were no complications associated with management in a Pavlik harness.

Discussion: Our overall rate of selective screening is 14 per 1,000 with a subsequent treatment rate of 2.3 per 1,000, which is comparable with other centres. Our rate of failure for DDH in a Pavlik harness (5.3 %) is extremely encouraging. Graf type IV hips and breech presentation correlated with a high likelihood of treatment failure.

Aim To assess whether prosthetic femoral stem centralisers have a detrimental effect on the maroporosity of the cement mantle, and if so, whether this is independent of their design and the rate of implantation.

Methods 30 identical moulded prosthetic femora were divided into 3 groups. Group 1; no centraliser (control), Group 2; centraliser A, Group 3 centraliser B. Using third generation cementation techniques and pressure monitoring, Charnley C-stems +/− the appropriate centraliser were implanted to a constant depth. Half in each group were implanted as rapidly as possible and the other half over 90 seconds. The stems were removed and the cement mantle then underwent a preliminary arthroscopic examination prior to being sectioned transversely at 3 constant levels. Each level was then photographed and digitally enlarged to a known scale to allow examination and determination of any cement voids (macropores) surface area.

Results There were no significant pressure fluctuations between the groups. Preliminary arthroscopic examination revealed that cement voids appeared more common when a centraliser was used. This difference was statistically confirmed (p=0.002) following sectioning of the specimens with cement voids found in 85% of femora when a centraliser was used and only 20% in the control group. Centraliser B performed worst with cement voids of a larger volume and more frequent occurrence (p=0.002). The macroporosity of the cement mantle was independent of the rate of implantation (p=0.39).

Conclusion The use of femoral stem centralisers is helpful in preventing malposition of the implant but results in increased macroporosity of the cement mantle. This may have implications regarding the longevity of an implant in terms of early loosening and therefore their design and use must always be carefully considered.

Aim: To identify the local and systemic morbidity of simultaneous sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty in a large patient population and to undertake a comparative statistical analysis with a group of matched patients who underwent staged bilateral total knee replacement during the same period.

Methods: Theatre records at two regional district general hospitals were scrutinised to identify all patients who had undergone simultaneous sequential and staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty over a three year period. Patient case notes and hospital charts were retrospectively reviewed to obtain several outcome measures to allow subsequent risk factor assessment.

Results: 134 patients with 268 primary knee arthroplasties undergoing a simultaneous procedure were identified. The average age was 70 with a minimum follow up of 12 months. The study results revealed 1.5% mortality, 5.2% local complication and 14.9% systemic complication rates and this increased with age. During the same period 34 patients (68 knees) who had undergone staged procedures at least 3 months apart were also identified. Statistically significant findings between both groups included the reduced length of hospital stay, a 3-fold increase in the requirement for banked blood (particularly when either suction drainage or low molecular weight heparin thromboprophylaxis was used) and a higher degree of intra operative instability in those undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement.

Conclusions: Patients can continue to enjoy the benefits of simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty, however, extreme caution must be taken in selection of patients over 75 years, high dependency facilities must be available and an acceptable alternative to banked blood transfusion needs to be used.

Aims: The aim of this study was to þnd out if undisplaced displaced distal radial fractures require plaster immobilisation. Methods: In this prospective study, undisplaced distal radial fractures were divided into two groups; plaster immobilisation was used for one group while removable volar splint was used for the other group. Follow up was at six weeks, three months and six months. Patients were assessed by clinical examination, grip strength, radiological assessment, EQ-5D and a Short Form 12 questionnaire. Results: At 3 months, no difference was found between the two groups in clinical evaluation, radiological assessment, the functional outcome, grip strength, and visual analogue score for pain. Conclusions: We conclude that undisplaced distal radius fractures can probably be treated with out a plaster cast and put straight into wrist orthosis.