Introduction: We investigated the routine use of CT scans in identifying alignment causes for failure as well as in the pre operative planning of the procedure.

Methods: Twenty poorly functioning total knee arthroplasties were analysed using the Perth CT protocol. All patients were awaiting revision total knee arthroplasty and were scanned using a GE multislice CT scanner. The measurements were performed using standard CT software. Knee society scores were obtained pre- and post-operative.

Results: The mean coronal position of the components was 3 degrees of valgus for the femoral component and 2.5 degrees of varus for the tibial component. Fourteen knees had errors of femoral component rotation, which ranged from 1 degree of external rotation to 9 degrees of internal rotation. Nine knees had errors of tibial baseplate rotation with all being internally rotated relative to the PCL/Tibial tuberosity axis from 3 to 12 degrees.

The cumulative error of implantation ranged from 6- 24 degrees in all 7 planes.

Knee society scores improved post-operatively from a mean of 52 pre-operatively to 83 at one year. Compound error also improved to a range of 6 to 10 in all 7 planes.

Conclusions: Revision total knee arthroplasty remains a difficult procedure but is increasing in frequency. The use of a CT protocol allows all coronal, sagittal and rotational errors of a previous implant to be accurately identified prior to surgery. We believe that all knee revision operations should have a CT scan as part of the pre operative planning. Also CT scans may be useful in investigating painful total knee replacements. Total knee replacement failure in some cases maybe explained by a cumulative error in alignment when no other obvious cause is found.

Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty is growing in popularity. It appears to reduce blood loss, reduce hospital stay, improve post-operative quadriceps function and shortens post-operative recovery. We show our experience of minimally invasive TKA with a computer navigation system.

Forty patients who underwent MICATKA were compared with forty patients having conventional CATKA. Component positioning was assessed radiographically with AP long leg standing views. Knee Society Scores, length of stay and recovery of straight leg raise was also recorded pre-operatively and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

Pre-operative Knee Society Scores showed no significant difference between the two groups. Post operatively the mean femoral component alignment was 89.7 degrees for MICATKA and 90.2 for CATKA. The mean tibial component alignment was 89.7 degrees for both. Knees society scores at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were statistically better in the MICATKA (p< 000.1). However the mean difference in Knee Society Scores had fallen. Straight leg raise was achieved by day one in 93% of the MICATKA compared to only 30% of the CATKA. Length of stay for MICATKA was a mean of 3.25 days with CATKA a mean of 6 days.

MICATKA is a safe procedure with reproducible results. Alignment is equivalent to CATKA. It gives statistically significant improvement in Knee Society Scores compared to the open procedure. The length of stay and time to straight leg raise is also reduced. At a minimum of 2 years follow-up we have seen no revisions and no evidence of radiographic loosening. A randomised multi centre trial is under way and early results are awaited.

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming a more frequent procedure throughout Europe. Painful patello-femoral problems, patellar dislocation, impingement pain as well as aseptic loosening and gross malalignment are among many causes. We investigated the use of CT scans in identifying alignment causes for pain in failed TKA where no other obvious cause is found.

Twenty poorly functioning TKA were analysed using the Perth CT protocol. All patients were awaiting revision TKA and had no obvious evidence of infection or loosening. They were scanned using a GE multislice CT scanner. The measurements were performed using standard CT software. Knee society scores were obtained pre- and post-operatively.

The mean coronal position of the components was three degrees of valgus for the femoral component and 2.5 degrees of varus for the tibial component. Fourteen knees had errors of femoral component rotation, which ranged from one degree of external rotation to nine degrees of internal rotation. The cumulative error of implantation ranged from 6–24 degrees in all planes. Knee society scores improved post-operatively from a mean of 52 pre-operatively to 83 at one year. Compound error also improved to a range of 6 to 10 degrees in all planes.

Revision TKA remains a difficult procedure that is increasing in frequency. The use of a CT protocol allows all coronal, sagital and rotational errors of an implant to be accurately identified prior to surgery. This could be useful in the small groups of patients with painful TKA that have no obvious cause for failure. Total knee replacement failure in these cases maybe explained by a cumulative error in alignment and correction of which may improve their Knee Society Scores.

We believe that a CT scan of a failed TKA is useful as part of the pre operative planning and also in investigating painful TKA where no obvious cause is found.