Introduction

Excessive standing posterior pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar spine stiffness, low pelvic Incidence (PI), and severe sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) have been linked to increased dislocation rates. We aimed to compare the prevalence of these 4 parameters in unstable and stable primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) patients.

Background

The purpose of this multi-center, randomized clinical trial was to compare static and articulating spacers in the treatment of PJI complicating total knee arthroplasty TKA.

The differential diagnosis of pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) should always include periprosthetic infection (PPI). The current diagnostic tools vary in sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. Currently there is no test with an absolute accuracy for diagnosis of PPI. Furthermore, cost effectiveness of investigations has become an important issue in recent years as increased expenses can place an unnecessary heavy burden on the medical system.

We retrospectively evaluated 296 patients who underwent revision TKA at our institution during 2000–2005 and had preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) performed. The criteria used for diagnosing infection were a positive intraoperative culture on solid media, presence of an abscess or sinus tract that communicated with the joint, positive preoperative aspiration culture, and/or elevated fluid cell count and neutrophil differential of the aspirated fluid. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of ESR and CRP were determined. Combinations were performed in parallel that necessitate both tests to be negative to rule out infection. The cost of each serological test was compared to that of other commonly used screening modalities.

One hundred and sixteen patients (39%) were classified as infected and 180 patients (61%) were considered non-infected. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the ESR were: 91%, 72%, 68%, and 93%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the CRP were: 94%, 74%, 70%, and 95%. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for the combined studies were 96% and 95%, respectively. However, five infected patients (4%) had a normal

ESR and CRP. An organism was cultured on solid media in 4 of the 5 cases. ESR and CRP were the least costly of all the preoperative tests including radionuclide imaging and joint fluid analysis. ESR and CRP are important preoperative tests in diagnosis of PPI and their ability to clench the diagnosis in the majority of cases should not be underestimated. When combined, these simple serological tests have improved sensitivity and negative predictive value to rule out infection.

Debridement of an infected total joint arthroplasty with retention of mechanically stable components is often performed for acute cases of periprosthetic infection (PPI). However, the reported success of such a procedure to fully eradicate infection has varied widely. The objective of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of debridement in both infected THA and TKA and attempt to identify risk factors responsible for failure.

During the years 2000–2005, 71 TKA and 69 THA underwent irrigation and debridement for acute PPI (< 4 weeks). All patients were followed up prospectively for at least two years. Detailed data including demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, and medication intake was collected. Intraoperative data, organism profile, and complications were also documented. Failure was defined as patient requiring additional surgical procedure for control of infection or loosening.

Of the 140 patients, 24% required repeat irrigation and debridement for postoperative drainage, hema-toma formation, or systemic symptoms. One third of these revision debridement patients underwent multiple consecutive debridements. Two-stage resection arthroplasty was required in 65 patients (46%) of the entire cohort. Fifty-eight percent of the patients with resection required revision of their cement spacer block due to continuous drainage and systemic symptoms indicative of persistent infection. We noted a total of 86 failures (61%) that required either an additional debridement or resection arthroplasty after the first debridement procedure. The failure rates of THA (62%) and TKA (55%) individually were similar (p=0.253).

Although the concept of conservative management of PPI with debridement and retention of components is an attractive alternative to resection arthroplasty, we have found that 60% of patients undergoing this procedure will inevitably undergo two-stage arthroplasty. Furthermore, more than half of the patients that required resection arthroplasty developed infection of their spacer that entailed revision of the cement block. Therefore, we can conclude that this procedure has a high failure rate and should be implemented in only a select group of patients.

The differential diagnosis of pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) should always include periprosthetic infection (PPI). The current diagnostic tools vary in sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. Currently, there is no test with an absolute accuracy for diagnosis of PPI. Furthermore, cost effectiveness of investigations has become an important issue in recent years as increased expenses can place an unnecessary heavy burden on the medical system.

We retrospectively evaluated 296 patients who underwent revision TKA at our institution during 2000–2005 and had preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) performed. The criteria used for diagnosing infection were a positive intraoperative culture on solid media, presence of an abscess or sinus tract that communicated with the joint, positive preoperative aspiration culture, and/or elevated fluid cell count and neutrophil differential of the aspirated fluid. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of ESR and CRP were determined. Combinations were performed in parallel that necessitate both tests to be negative to rule out infection. The cost of each serological test was compared to that of other commonly used screening modalities.

One hundred sixteen patients (39%) were classified as infected and 180 patients (61%) were considered non-infected. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the ESR were: 91%, 72%, 68%, and 93%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the CRP were: 94%, 74%, 70%, and 95%. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for the combined studies were 96% and 95% respectively. However, five infected patients (4%) had a normal ESR and CRP. An organism was cultured on solid media in 4 of the 5 cases.

ESR and CRP were the least costly of all the preoperative tests including radionuclide imaging and joint fluid analysis. ESR and CRP are important preoperative tests in the diagnosis of PPI and their ability to clench diagnosis in the majority of cases should not be underestimated. When combined, those simple serological tests have improved sensitivity and negative predictive value to rule out infection.

Purpose: Periprosthetic infection (PPI) is a devastating complication. Surgical intervention to treat PPI is often required. The objective of this prospective study is to determine if there is any difference in functional improvement following revision TKA in patients with infected and non-infected failures.

Methods: 123 consecutive patients undergoing revision TKA at our institution were prospectively recruited into this study. The indication for revision TKA was PPI in 37 cases and aseptic failure in 86 cases. Detailed patient demographics and functional outcome using SF-36, KSS, Womac, lower extremity functional outcome score were collected at base line and at various time points after revision TKA. The baseline and two year follow up functional scores were calculated and compared. The functional score at the time of diagnosis of PPI (prosthesis in place) were used for baseline comparisons

Results: All baseline functional scores, and their individual elements, for the infected cases were worse than the non-infected cases. The functional scores at the two-year follow-up were not different between the infected and non-infected cases. Hence, there was a more impressive improvement (Δ) in functional outcome for the infected cases following revision TKA compared to non-infected cases. However, the general health perception as determined by the patients themselves appeared to deteriorate after revision TKA in both groups.

Discussion: It appears that patients with PPI are markedly more disabled at base line than the non-infected cases. These patients, however, benefit the most from surgical intervention compared to the non-infected cases. It appears that the patients’ perception of improvement in functional scores is less optimistic than physician measured parameters.