Aim

Diagnosing low-grade periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) can be very challenging due to low-virulent microorganisms capable of forming biofilm. Clinical signs can be subtle and may be similar to those of aseptic failure. To minimize morbidity and mortality and to preserve quality of life, accurate diagnosis is essential. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of various diagnostic tests in diagnosing low-grade PJI.

The use of rotating hinge (RH) prostheses for severe primary as well as revision arthroplasty is widely established. Aim of this study was to investigate long term results of a new RH prosthesis (EnduRo®, B Braun, Germany), which uses carbon-fiber reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (CFR PEEK) as a new bearing material, first time used in knee arthroplasty.

Fifty-six consecutive patients, who received the EnduRo® RH prosthesis were included in this prospective study: 21 patients (37.5%) received the prosthesis as a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 35 patients (62.5%) underwent revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKA). Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed preoperatively as well as postoperatively after 3 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Min. Follow up was 7 and mean follow up 9,3 years. Clinical examination included Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and range of motion (ROM). Competing risk analysis was assessed for survival with respect to indication and failure mode.

KSS, WOMAC, OKS, and ROM significantly improved from the preoperative to the follow up investigations (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in clinical outcome between the primary and the revision group. The overall cumulative incidence for revision for any reason was 23.6% and the cumulative incidence for complications associated with failure of the prothesis was 5.6% at 7 years, respectively. Complications occurred more frequently in the revision group (p = 0.002).

The evaluated RH prosthesis provided reliable and durable results with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. Prosthesis survival was successful considering the complexity of cases. The use of this RH system in primary patients showed high survival rates. Long-term functional and clinical results proved to be satisfying in both revision and primary cases. No adverse events were associated with the new bearing material CFR-PEEK.

Aim

Aim of the study was to find out whether patients with positive minor criteria but without meeting the MSIS definition have a difference in the outcome after revision-surgery compared to patients without any MSIS-criteria? And does the reason for revision-surgery (eg. loosening) have an additional influence on the outcome parameters in patients with positive minor criteria?

Aim

Quantitative assessment of alpha-Defensin offers a promising approach for diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with sensitivities and specificities ranging from 97% to 100% and 95% to 100%, respectively. However, to the best of our knowledge and after due inquiry little information exists concerning qualitative measurements of alpha-Defensin. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the alpha-Defensin test, a lateral flow test for the qualitative detection of alpha-Defensin.

Septic arthritis is a therapeutic emergency with a high mortality rate (about 11%)(1). Inadequate treatment can cause permanent joint damage. Management of the septic arthritis includes prompt antibiotic treatment as well as joint-decompression and removal of purulent material(2). It is still discussed controversially and there is little evidence which surgical concept is preferable: arthroscopy with lavage and debridement or open arthrotomy with synovectomy(3,4). The aim of the study was to compare efficacy of arthroscopy and arthrotomy in patients with septic gonarthritis.

We evaluated 70 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopy or arthrotomy at our clinic, because of a bacterial monarthritis of the knee between 2002 and 2010. Our primary outcome was the early recurrence of infection (> 3 months after surgery), which made a second surgery necessary. We compared patients who suffered reinfection and those who did not, in regard to the surgery type as well as potential confounders like comorbidity (measured by Charlson comorbidity index), age, body mass index (BMI), Gächter's -, Kellgren and Lawrence - and Outerbridge classification, duration of symptoms and inflammatory parameters. Furthermore we evaluated differences of the confounders between the surgery groups.

From the 70 patients 41 were treated arthroscopic and 29 with arthrotomy. In total eight patients (11.4%) had to undergo a second surgery because of early reinfection. The rate was significantly higher in patients treated with arthrotomy (n=6; 20.7%) compared to those treated with arthroscopy (n=2; 4.9%) (p=0.041). Whereas we found no significant influence of potential confounders between the reinfection group and the group where primary eradication was achieved. Patients who underwent arthrotomy were significantly older, had more comorbidities (both p<0.001) and higher grades of osteoarthritis according to Kellgren and Lawrence classification (p=0.023). In order to adjust the study population towards confounders we performed a subgroup analysis on patients of the second and third age percentile. When we repeated our analysis we still found a significant higher reinfection rate in the arthrotomy group (p=0.036). At the same time there were no differences in prevalence of confounders, neither between the two surgery groups, nor between the reinfection and the primary eradication group.

Patients with bacterial monarthritis of the knee who were treated with arthroscopy had a significantly lower reinfection rate than those treated with arthrotomy. As arthroscopy is the less invasive and more sufficient method it should be considered the routine treatment according to our data.