Introduction

Thoracic pedicle screws have been proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the effect of the instrumentation alloy has not yet been investigated. We aimed to compare segmental versus non segmental thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation in patients with AIS.

Introduction

Posterior spinal arthrodesis with thoracoplasty and an open anterior approach, with respect to a posterior only fusion, have a deleterious effect on pulmonary function for up to 5 years after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. We aimed to compare two groups of adolescents surgically treated for their spinal deformity either by posterior segmental fusion alone (PSF) or by posterior spinal fusion and thoracoplasty (PSF+T). We focused on the long-term effects of thoracoplasty on pulmonary function in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Introduction

We aimed to determine the midterm effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on sagittal plane alignment, compared with a hybrid alignment, in the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Study design. A retrospective study design

Objective. To comprehensively compare the 2-year clinical outcome of lumbar laminectomy alone versus lumbar laminetomy supplemented with dynamic stabilization (Dynesys system) in degenerative lumbar stenosis in elderly patients.

Material and Methods. A total of 60 elderly patients with an average age of 65.1 years (range, 50 to 78 yrs) affected by lumbar stenosis that underwent lumbar laminectomy alone (30 cases) or lumbar laminectomy with supplementary Dynesys system (30 cases) at our Department were sorted and matched according to three criteria : similar patient age, similar degenerative lumbar desease, and identical operative methods (i.e. levels of laminectomy). Patients were compared according to Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland Morris, SF-36 and VAS outcomes scores.

Results. The two cohorts were well matched at 2-years follow-up. Patients treated with lumbar laminectomy alone presented reduced operative time and intraoperative blood loss and reduced postoperative complications, with better clinical outcome compared with patients that received laminectomy with supplementary Dynesys system, for ODI score (28.9 vs 31), Roland Morris (8.25 vs 9.1) and VAS scores (leg pain 36 vs 44.3; back pain 31 vs 38.7), while SF-36 scores resulted similar in both groups of patients.

Conclusions. In degenerative lumbar stenosis, supplementary dynamic stabilization in addition to decompressive laminectomy did not presented significant advantages, with respect to functional outcome, in comparison to lumbar laminectomy alone.

We considered three different device systems for the treatment of lumbar and lumbosacral instability. From a prospective database in use in our Institution, we obtained a 45-patient cohort of individuals who received a one-level lumbar or lumbosacral fusion procedure between 1995 and 1998. All patients had presented with disabling back and/or radicular pain and severe degenerative changes at one disc level or low-grade spondylolisthesis.

First group: 15 patients, six male and nine female, with an average age of 41 years, were treated by an interbody fusion using cylindrical threaded cages; the levels fused were L5-S1 in 10 patients and at L4-L5 in five.

Second group: 15 patients, eight male and seven female, with an average age of 39 years were treated by nine cylindrical, threaded cages and seven square cages, combined with posterior pedicle screws; the levels fused were L5-S1 in 11 and L4-L5 in four.

Third group: 15 patients, eight male and seven female, with an average age of 40 years, underwent posterolateral fusion with posterior pedicle screws instrumentation alone; the levels fused were L5-S1 in 10 and L4-L5 in the remaining five.

At a mean follow-up of 8 years in the first group, eight patients (53%) required a second operation (five posterior instrumentation, two root decompression and one repair of dural tear). The clinical results were fair in six patients (40%) and poor in three (20%); five patients (33%) presented uncertain fusion signs. In the second group, two patients (13%) required a second operation (one root decompression and one dural repair). All patients (100%) presented definite fusion signs. The clinical results 6.5 years after primary surgery were fair in two (13%) patients and poor in two (13%). In the third group, two patients (13%) required a second operation (one dural repairand one implant removal). The clinical results were fair in two cases (13%) and no poor results were seen. At a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, 14 patients (93%) showed definite fusion signs.

According to the present data, we can conclude that in terms of fusion success, clinical outcome and complication rates, the use of posterior interbody cages alone is not as safe and effective for the management of one level degenerative disc disease or low-grade spondylolisthesis as the posterior pedicle screw instrumentation combined with two posterior cages or the stand-alone pedicle screw instrumentation.

The purpose of this review is to evaluatei the clinical and surgical aspects of lumbar disc herniation in paediatric and adolescent patients. Between 1975 and 1991, a total of 5,160 lumbar disc operations were performed at the Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institutes. We included in this study only 129 patients (2.5%), aged from 9 to 18 years, with a mean age of 16.2 years (S.D. 1.7). Almost half of the patients (66 cases) ranged from 17 to 18 years of age and 49% (63 cases) from 9 to 16. Only three subjects were aged 9, 11 and 12 years.

This group consisted of 84 boys and 45 girls. Eleven had noted the onset of symptoms after a trauma and 15 during athletic activities or after lifting heavy objects. Almost all of the patients (106 cases, 82%) had low-back pain with radiculopathy, 13% (17 cases) complained of lumbar pain alone, 5% (six cases) had sciatica and 16% (21 cases) presented with a radicular neurological deficit.

Posterior discectomy by conventional procedure without fusion was performed in all patients, except for three cases with associated spondylolisthesis, treated by a posterolateral artrodesis, supplemented in two cases by pedicle screw fusion. Patients were followed in a short-term assessment using medical records. Long-term follow-up was conducted by a mailed, self-report questionnaire that quantified leg and back pain and scored the ability to return to normal activities and satisfaction.

Short-term results were excellent for 120 patients (93%) and postoperative complications included one superficial wound infection and one discitis. A total of 98 (76%) long-term responses were obtained with a mean follow-up time of 12.4 years (range, 6-19.4 years). Mean age at long-term follow-up was 28.7 years whereas the functional outcomes were excellent in 56%, good 30% and poor 14%. Eight patients (6.2%) required additional surgical treatment at a mean interval from the first surgery of 9 years (range 2 to 16). Three of them had a re-exploration for a herniated disc at the same level, five at a different level.

Our results have confirmed, as in adult patients, a negative trend between the short-term and long-term functional outcomes in young patients treated by discectomy. Furthermore, they have suggested that young individuals with lumbar Scheuermann-type changes are at great risk of experiencing herniation of intervertebral discs (10% in our series).

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and reliability of posterior intra-operative reduction and fusion by pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of children and adolescents for severe lumbosacral spondy-lolisthesis.Researchers identified 21 patients who underwent reduction of their high-grade spondylolisthesis at our Institution between 1993 and 2000. Recent clinical and radiograph data were available for all patients. Indications for surgery were severe back pain in 21 patients, leg pain in 17, cosmetic appearance in 16 and progression of slippage in 15. There were 11 females and 10 males, aged 16 years on average (range, 11–18 years). Seven patients had grade III slippage, nine grade IV and five grade V. The slippage was at L4-L5 level in one patient and at L5-S1 in the remaining cases. The instrumented levels were 2 (L4-S1) in 12 patients and 1 in nine (L5-S1). The patients underwent surgery using a single posterior surgical procedure. After removal of the loosened arch and complete discectomy, gradual distraction and posterior translation of the anteriorly displaced vertebral body were performed using a temporary device (Harrington rod) placed bilaterally between L1 and the sacral wings. Reduction was followed by a posterior interbody strut graft or placement of titanium cages and pedicle segmental fixation.

At a mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 1–10 years) a complete remission of back pain was observed in 18 cases and incomplete in three; all presented solid fusion radiographically. The mean correction of the slippage was 33.1%.(from 78.3% to 41%) and that of the slippage angle 51% (from 35.2° to 17°). Complications included two skin protrusions of a sacral screw, two transitory neurological deficit (L5-S1). Two patients with screw pullout underwent instrumentation revision and reinsertion of screws; another two patients underwent anterior interbody fusion since slippage exceeded 50% after posterior reduction.

Reduction of high-grade spondylolisthesis may be considered for patients with a high degree of lumbosacral kyphosis, an unacceptable clinical appearance, and/or neurological deficit. With the advent of pedicle screw fixation, posterior instrumentation and reduction appears feasible. We found that using the gradual reduction by temporary Harrington rod incurs less risk than other options for treating high-grade spondylolisthesis. This procedure provides a controlled method of reduction where continuous visualisation of nerve roots is possible and internal fixation is achieved.