The standard of wide tumour-like resection for chronic osteomyelitis (COM) has been challenged recently by adequate debridement. This paper reviews the evolution of surgical debridement for long bone COM, and presents the outcome of adequate debridement in a tertiary bone infection unit. We analyzed the retrospective record review from 2014 to 2020 of patients with long bone COM. All were managed by multidisciplinary infection team (MDT) protocol. Adequate debridement was employed for all cases, and no case of wide resection was included.Aims
Methods
Wide, tumor-like resection for chronic osteomyelitis (COM), a standard practice previously, has been challenged recently with adequate, local debridement. This paper reviews the evolution of surgical debridement for long bone osteomyelitis, and presents the outcome of adequate debridement in a tertiary bone infection unit. Retrospective review of records from 2014 to 2020 of patients with long bone osteomyelitis. All records were searched electronically and imaging reviewed. All patients were managed by Multidisciplinary Infection Team protocol.Introduction
Materials & Methods
Osteomyelitis (OM) is a challenging condition to diagnose and treat. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is used in managing complex diseases such as cancer and diabetes. The Hull Regional Bone Infection MDT team was established to provide coordinated care for patients suspected to have OM. This study reviews the orthoplastic treatment and outcomes of patients with non-periprosthetic OM. Retrospective review of patients presenting to the MDT team who had orthoplastic intervention with debridement and flap coverage between 1/6/2014 - 30/11/2018. We describe our MDT approach of assessment, planning for surgical intervention and antibiotic protocol. Data was obtained from electronic and paper patient records, and PACS.Introduction
Materials and Methods
This study aimed to evaluate the impact on length of hospital stay from dedicated infectious diseases input for orthopaedic infection patients compared to sporadic infection specialist input. We conducted an observational cohort study of 157 adults with orthopaedic infections at a teaching hospital in the UK. The orthopaedic infections included were: osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, infected metalwork and prosthetic joint infections, and adults were aged 18 years or more. Prior to August 2016, advice on orthopaedic infection patients was adhoc with input principally from the on-call infectious diseases registrar and phone calls to microbiology whereas after August 2016 these patients received regular input from dedicated infectious diseases doctor(s). The dedicated input involved bedside reviews, medical management, correct antimicrobial prescribing, managing adverse drug reactions, increased use of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) services especially self-administration of intravenous antibiotics and shared decision-making for treatment failure, whilst remaining under orthopaedic team care. Orthopaedic patients operated on for management of their infection between 29/8/16 and 15/3/17 were prospectively identified and orthopaedic operation records were used to retrospectively identified patients between 29/8/15 and 15/3/16. The length of stay was compared between the 2 groups.Aim
Method
Open fractures of the long bones of the limbs are associated with an increased risk of osteomyelitis and few studies investigate this complication in circular frames. We reviewed the incidence of and contributory factors toward infection-related outcomes in Grade 3 open fractures, managed with a circular frame, at a single centre. We performed a retrospective study of consecutive adult patients presenting with a Grade 3 open fracture, who required a circular frame for definitive skeletal fixation from 2005 to 2014. Patient case notes, microbiology results and radiological studies were reviewed for demographic details and surgical management. Infection-related outcomes were classified as ‘possible’ and ‘definitive’, based on clinical findings, microbiology and imaging features at follow-up at 6 and 12 months. 74 patients were identified with an average age of 43 years. There were 70 unilateral and 4 bilateral limb injuries. Most treated limbs had a tibial fracture (97%). There were 24 Gustillo-Anderson grade 3A, 37 grade 3B, 4 grade 3C and 9 not sub-classified. 33% of patients were debrided on the day of injury. Average time to circular frame installation was 14 days. 27 Ilizarov, 44 Taylor spatial and 3 other circular frames were used. A variety of plastic surgery reconstruction was used to provide wound coverage: skin grafts, local and free flaps. Circular frames were in place for 259 days on average. 10 patients (1 bilateral limb fracture) still have their frames in-situ. Additional bone grafting to the fracture site was carried out in 13 patients and 15 limbs (1 patient had 2 episodes of bone grafting to the same limb). 8 limbs in 8 patients were excluded from infection-related outcome analysis: 4 patients lost to follow-up, 2 patients who went on to below knee amputation and 2 patients had <6 months’ follow-up. 13 patients (14 limbs) had only 6 months’ follow-up and 53 patients (56 limbs) had 12 months’ follow-up. There were 5 patients (5 limbs) with ‘possible’ infection (7%): 1 screw infection and 4 soft tissue infections. 1 patient (1 limb) had a tissue-confirmed ‘definitive’ infected non-union (1.4%). Patients managed with circular frames typically have complex fracture configurations less amenable to other methods of definitive fixation. Our patient cohort has a limb salvage rate (97%) and a soft tissue infection rate (‘possible’ infection) comparable to other reported series. We report a low rate of osteomyelitis (‘definitive’ infection) in consecutive patients managed using our protocol.
