Full thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyles are frequent, can be highly symptomatic, and pose treatment challenges when encountered in middle-aged patients. A history of biological repair procedures is frequent and patient management is complex in order to delay joint replacement procedures in active patients. Focal metallic resurfacing provides a joint preserving bridging procedure with a clinical exit into primary arthroplasty.

Understanding the cause of failure of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) is essential in guiding clinical decision making and adjusting treatment concepts for revision surgery. The purpose of the study was to determine current mechanisms of failure of TKA and to describe changes and trends in revision surgery over the last 10 years.

A retrospective review was done on all patients who had revision total knee arthroplasty during a 10-year period (2000–2009) at one institution. The preoperative evaluation in conjunction with the intraoperative findings was used to determine causes of failure. All procedures were categorizes as Sharkey et al. described previously. The data was analyzed regarding the cause of failure and displaying the incidence and trends over the last 10 years.

1225 surgeries were done in the time period with a steady increase of procedures per year (34 procedures in 2000 to 196 in 2009). The most common cause of revision TKA was aseptic failure in 65% and septic failure in 31% of the reviewed cases. However, we could observe a steady proportional increase of the septic classified revisions over the time. Both categories could be subdivided to specific causes of failure including aseptic loosening (24%), anterior knee pain (20%), instability (6,4%), arthrofibrosis (4,9%), PE wear (3,6%), malpositioning/malrotation (2,7%) periprosthetic fracture (2,0%) and other (4,6%), or in early (12,9%), late (15,4%) or low-grade infection (3,3%), respectively. Complementary to the classification Sharkey et al. described in 2002 we identified new subcategories of failure: malrotation (since 2003), Low-Grade-Infection (since 2006), allergic failure/loosening (since 2006), Mid-Flexion-Instability (since 2007), soft tissue impingement (since 2009). The incidence of the classic aseptic loosening due to PE wear shows a clear decrease in the last 10 years whereas we could observe an increase of the new diagnosis of instability, malrotation or low-grade-infection as determined cause of failure.

The detailed analysis of the failure mechanism in total knee arthroplasty is important to understand the clinical problem and to adjust treatment strategies. We were able to complement present classifications and give a first overview on the incidence for specific causes of failure. Our data shows changes in the indication for surgery over the time and compared to the collective of Sharkey et al. from 1997–2000. This might be due to new diagnostic methods and better implant materials as well as to a generally increased awareness of the specific mechanism of TKA failure.

Background: Increased contact stress with a femoral resurfacing prosthesis implanted in the medial femoral condyle and a non-functional meniscus is of concern for potential deleterious effects on tibiofemoral contact mechanics.

Methods: Peak contact pressures were determined in seven fresh frozen human cadaveric specimens using a pressure sensitive sensor placed in the medial compartment above the menisci. A knee simulator was used to test each knee in static stance positions (5°/15°/30°/45°) and through 10 dynamic knee-flexion cycles (5°–45°) with single body weight ground reaction force (GRF) which was adjusted to the living body weight of the cadaver donor. All specimens were tested in three different conditions: Untreated knee (A); Flush implantation of a 20mm resurfacing prosthesis (HemiCAP^®) in the weight bearing area of the medial femoral condyle (B); Complete radial tear at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus with the femoral resurfacing device in place (C).

Results: On average, flush device implantation resulted in no statistically significant differences when compared to the untreated normal knee. The meniscal tear resulted in a significant increase of the mean maximum peak contact pressures by 63%, 57%, and 57% (all P ≤ 0.05) at 15°, 30° and 45° static stance positions and 78% (P ≤ 0.05) through the dynamic knee flexion cycle. No significant different maximum peak contact pressures were observed at 5° stance position.

Conclusion: Possible effects of reduced meniscal tissue and biomechanical integrity of the meniscus must be considered in an in-vivo application of the resurfacing device.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of different prosthesis designs (Deep-Dish (DD) vs. posterior stabilized (PS)) on the patello-femoral pressure. The femoro-patellar pressure depends among other things on the AP stability of the knee joint. The use of DD has been described to be equally applicable with a resected or deficient PCL.

Methods: Fresh frozen human knee specimens (n = 8, 7 male, 1 female) underwent testing in a kinematic device simulating an isokinetic knee extension cycle from 120° of flexion to full extension. Knee motion was driven by a hydraulic cylinder applying sufficient force to the quadriceps tendon to produce an extension moment of 31 Nm. The amount of patellofemoral contact pressure and its distribution was measured by means of a pressure sensitive film (Tekscan^®, Inc., Boston, USA). Patellar contact pressure was examined first after implantation of a cruciate retaining TKA (Genesis II, Smith& Nephew, Memphis, USA). An 11 mm polyethylene (PE) DD insert was tested before and after resection of the PCL. Finally, the femoral component of the CR TKA was removed and replaced by a posterior stabilized (PS) model repeating measurements with an 11 mm PE inlay. The patella was not resurfaced throughout the whole procedure. A paired sampled t-test was applied for comparison of means and considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Results: There was no statistical significant difference of patello-femoral peak and mean contact pressures of the DD inlay before and after resection of the PCL. After implantation of the PS TKA peak pressure was significantly lower (Mean: 6.12 ± 2.37 MPa, Range: 10.68 – 3.30 MPa) in comparison with the DD type (7.12 ± 2.53 MPa, 11.94 – 3.55 MPa; p < 0.01) with a preserved PCL. Also the mean contact pressure turned out to be lower with the PS design (p < 0.006; PS: 3.58 ± 1.25 MPa, 5.91 – 2.08 MPa, DD: 4.27 ± 1.34 MPa, 6.66 – 2.18 MPa). The contact area was also significantly smaller with the PS design (p < 0.03, PS: 140.84 ± 40.04 mm2, 188.47 – 65.10 sq mm, DD: 175.97 ± 24.46 sq mm, 222.56 – 142.56 sq mm).

After resection of the PCL differences in contact pressures and contact area between DD and PS failed to reach statistical significance although there was an obvious tendency towards lower pressures with the PS-design.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that a posterior stabilized TKA design reduces the retropatellar peak and mean pressure as well as the contact area in comparison with a deep-dish design when the PCL is preserved. The better reproducible rollback with a PS model could serve as a possible explanation. However, this difference is less pronounced when a DD inlay is applied after resection of the PCL. Nevertheless, a PS rather than a DD design is recommended in the PCL deficient knee.

Objective: Decreased quadriceps strength may contribute to anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The quadriceps force necessary to establish full extension is strongly dependent on the position and the relative length of the lever arms over the knee joint. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the amount of quadriceps force required to extend the knee isokinetically after TKA in dependence of different prosthesis designs and the state of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).

Methods: Eight fresh frozen human knee specimens were tested in a kinematic device that simulated an isokinetic knee extension cycle from 120° of flexion to full extension. Knee motion was driven by a hydraulic cylinder applying sufficient force to the quadriceps tendon to produce an extension moment of 31 Nm. The quadriceps force was measured using a load cell attached to the quadriceps tendon after implantation of a cruciate retaining (CR) TKA (Genesis II, Smith& Nephew, Memphis, Tn, USA) applying a conventional and a highly conforming polyethylene (PE) inlay before and after resection of the PCL. Finally, the femoral component of the CR TKA was replaced by a posterior stabilized (PS) design and measurements were redone.

Results: No significant differences in the average quadriceps force were detected between the different PCL retaining inlays (CR, highly conforming) as long as the PCL was intact. However, after resection of the PCL, the required quadriceps force increased significantly for both designs (CR: 4.7%, p < 0.01, Highly conforming: 3.5%, p < 0.03). After implantation of the PS femoral component quad force decreased to its initial levels with forces significantly lower compared to the PCL deficient knees provided with a CR (−6.0%, p < 0.01) or highly conforming (−5.1%, p < 0.01) inlay. With a PS design average quadriceps extension force was not significantly different from cruciate retaining TKA inlays at an intact PCL.

Conclusions: The data of this in vitro study suggest that the quadriceps extension force is significantly higher for knees after cruciate retaining TKA with PCL deficiency, independent of the use of a CR or DD inlay. Thus, the integrity of the PCL should be secured in clinical practice when using a cruciate preserving TKA design.

Background: Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty has gained new attention after recently published positive results. It is considered an intermediate treatment for the patient with isolated arthritis of the anterior compartment of the knee. Aim of this nationwide survey was to determine the current status of patellofemoral arthroplasty in Germany.

Methods: All German departments of orthopaedic surgery, traumatology and general surgery with a yearly performance of at least fifty knee arthroplasties were asked to complete a standardized questionnaire. In the first part, surgeons were asked general questions about their department size, case numbers of knee arthroplasties per year and non-endoprosthetic treatment of isolated patellofemoral disorders. If patellofemoral arthroplasty was conducted, parameters concerning age, gender, duration of complaints, indication for surgery, surgical approach, type of endoprosthesis used, additional surgical treatments and failures were evaluated in the second part. Furthermore we asked for the reasons if no isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty was performed.

Results: A total of 224 (30%) usable questionnaires were returned. Of 53420 knee arthroplasties performed per year, only 195 were isolated patellofemoral arthroplaties (0.37%). However, in 54 departments (24%), at least one isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty was performed with an average of 3.95 (1–20) procedures per year. The majority of patients were between 40 and 60 years old (40–60y: 56%; 20–40y: 8%, 60–80y: 35%, > 80y: 1%). Females were affected in 65% of patients. Etiology of isolated patellofemoral arthritis was believed to be idiopathic in 41% and traumatic in 8%. Patellofemoral dysplasia was held responsible in 47% and patellofemoral instability in 4% of cases. The main reason for failure and surgical revision was ongoing pain of the affected knee (40%). Negative attitude and disbelief towards the success of isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty were stated by the majority (62%) of non-users. A lack of appropriate indications was reported by 22% and missing know-how by 16%.

Conclusions: Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty has only little significance among surgeons performing knee arthroplasty in Germany. Although promising results were reported in the literature, the majority of surgeons do not believe in the success of the procedure.