The optimal treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) remains controversial. The operative treatment group has better anatomical recovery, functional outcome scores and less pain than non operative treatment patients, but it may lead to a higher incidence of complications, such as delayed wound healing and surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to analyze the prophylactic effect using a biphasic bone substitute (BS) eluting antibiotic on calcaneal implant-related infections. We conducted a retrospective non-randomized review of all patients with DIACF (type Sanders 2, 3, 4) from 2009 to 2017; 103 calcaneal fractures of 90 patients (13 bilaterally) were treated with plates. All cases received the same systemic antibiotic prophylaxis; BS was used on more complex cases with large bone defect and BS was added with antibiotic on higher risk patients. We collected data including complications: major (deep infections, osteomyelitis) and minor complications (wound dehiscence, superficial infection). We considered the absence of deep infections after 6 months. We compared statistically the outcomes of 3 operative groups: the first was treated with plates only (A), the second with plates and BS (B) and the third with plates added with BS eluting antibiotic (vancomicine or gentamicine) (C).Aim
Methods
Open fractures with bone defects and skin lesions carry a high risk of infection potentially leading to prolonged hospitalization and complication requiring revision procedures. Treatment options for diaphyseal fractures with soft tissue lesions are one- or two-stage approaches using external fixation or intramedullary nailing. We describe a surgical technique combining intramedullary nailing with an antibiotic-eluting biphasic bone substitute (BBS) applied both at the fracture site, for dead-space management and infection prevention, and on the nail surface for the prophylaxis of implant-related infection. Adult patients with an increased risk of bony infection (severe soft tissue damage and open fractures of Gustilo-Anderson grades I and II) were treated with debridement followed by application on the intramedullary nail surface, in the canal and at the fracture site of a BBS with prolonged elution (to 28 days) of either gentamicin or vancomycin. All patients also received systemic antibiotic prophylaxis following surgery. Data on infections and other adverse events were collected throughout the follow-up period. Bone union was determined by radiographic assessment of 4 cortices in radiographs obtained 1 year after surgery.Aim
Method
Open fractures with bone loss and skin lesions carry a high risk of infection and complication. Treatment options are usually a two-stage approach (debridement, temporary stabilization with external fixation followed by open reduction and stabilization with plate). We describe an experience for a single stage procedure with an antibiotic eluting bone graft substitute (BGS) for prophylaxis of implant-related infection. Between December 2014 and January 2016 were analysed the data of twenty-six patients with open fractures (Gustilo and Anderson grade I and II) or with skin lesion and high risk of contamination and bone loss. They where treated with debridement of soft tissue, closed reduction of fracture, placement of a plate augmented with BGS eluting antibiotic (gentamicin (1) and/or Vancomicin (2)). Ampicillin and sulbactam 3g three times daily was used as systemic antibiotic prophylaxis minimum for one week. Clinical outcome and radiographic bone defect filling were assessed by blinded observers.Aim
Method
