Introduction

We present our experience of 22 patients with low grade degenerative lumbar spondylolysthesis with stenosis (21 Grade I and 1 Grade II) who were treated using new stabilization systems {Scient'x IsoBar TTL Dynamic Rod Stabilization and the Inlign™ Multi-Axial pedicle Screws (Disc Motion Technologies - DMT)}.

To examine the relationship between obesity (BMI> 30) and the incidence of peri-operative complications, outcome of surgery and return to work in patients undergoing elective less invasive posterior lumbar inter-body fusion of the lumbar spine for low back pain and leg pain (“LI-PLIF”).

15 patients with BMI> 30 who underwent (“LI-PLIF”) were identified by reviewing the clinical notes and the pre-operative admission sheet from April 2005- to March 2007. All had suffered chronic low back pain for a minimum of 2 years that had proven unresponsive to conservative treatment. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative evaluations for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), short-form 36 (SF-36), and visual analogue scores (VAS). Minimum follow-up was for 12 months.

Blood loss was dependent on BMI, number of levels, and surgical time. Post operative complication was more in the morbidly obese group than the in the obese. 10 patients (66.6%) returned to their normal pre-operative employment within the 12 months of the index procedure. There was a significant improvement in the ODI and in the VAS for back pain. Length of hospital stay was a mean of 3.3 days

Although surgery is technically more demanding our experience with less invasive posterior inter-body fusion has shown less incidence of post operative complication, less intra-operative blood loss and short in-patient hospital stay.

We conclude that a high BMI should not be a contraindication to surgery in patients with degenerative low back pain.

Ethics approval: None: Audit Interest Statement None

The aim of this study is to review the functional outcome of the patients treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for FBSS.

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 39 patients diagnosed with FBSS and treated with PLIF between June 2000 and December 2008 by the senior author in our unit. Pain and function were evaluated by VAS for Back (VAS-BP) & leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires, and were completed pre- & post-operatively.

There were 39 patients (20 women & 19 men) and mean age at operation was 47.3 years (range of 32 to 76.1 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 39.14 months (range 5.21 -73.5 months). Thirty-one patients were diagnosed as Post laminectomy syndrome and 8 patients as post-discectomy syndrome.

The mean pre and post-operative ODI values were 54.13 and 29.14 respectively. The mean pre-operative VAS back and leg pain scores were 7.38 and 6.51 respectively. The mean post-operative VAS for back and leg pain scores were reduced to 4.05 (Pre-op:7.38) and 3.69 (Mean pre-op 6.51)respectively. The mean preoperative SF-36 bodily pain component score was 27.42 and the mean postoperative score was 40.50.

Four patients had uncomplicated dural tears that resolved completely. Two patients had superficial wound infection that resolved with oral antibiotics.

PLIF is one of the safe and effective treatment option for FBSS and it has shown good results in our series.

Recurrence of back or leg pain after discectomy is a well-recognised problem with an incidence of up to 28%. Once conservative measures have failed, several surgical options are available and have been tried with varying degrees of success. In this study, 42 patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy underwent less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (LI-PLIF). Clinical outcome was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires and visual analogue scales for back (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP). There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcome measures (p < 0.001). The debate around which procedure is the most effective for these patients remains controversial.

Our results show that LI-PLIF is as effective as any other surgical procedure. However, given that it is less invasive, we feel that it should be considered as the preferred option.

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) refers to having persistent back and/or leg pain after one or more surgical procedures aimed at correcting lumbosacral disease. Different modalities including Epidural injections, Spinal cord stimulation, Anterior/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF, PLIF) have been described in the literature with varying outcome. Our aim was to review the functional outcome of patients treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for FBSS since June 2000 to December 2006.

This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 25 patients diagnosed with FBSS and treated with PLIF at University Hospital of North Tees. All patients were requested to fill in the Oswestry Disability Index(ODI), Numerical Rating Scale for Back Pain (NRSBP), Numerical Rating Scale for Leg Pain (NRSLP), SF36 pre and post operatively. The scores were analysed using SPSS software for statistical significance.

There were 12 men and 13 women. Mean age was 47.8 years (range 31–76 years). Mean follow up was 24.8 months (range 4 – 63 months). Four of the 25 patients had Post discectomy syndrome while the rest had post laminectomy syndrome. Most common level of surgery was L5/S1 either as a single level or in combination with other levels above. ODI decreased from a pre-op mean of 55.6(range 20–74.1) to 20.6(range 2–54) while VASBP decreased from 6.9 (range 1–9) to 2.2(range 0–6) (p< 0.05) and VASLP decreased from 6.4 (range 3–10) to 2.2 (range 0–7) (p< 0.05). SF36BP scores improved from a mean 26.7 (range 12–37.1) before the surgery to 45 (range 31–62) (p< 0.05) after surgery. 84% of the patients felt that the outcome of the surgery met their expectation and were satisfied with result.

Our results show that PLIF can be offered as a safe and effective for treatment of FBSS.

Purpose: To assess the outcomes in consecutive 32 patients of two level cervical disc replacement

Methods: In this article, we report 2-year results of anterior cervical decompression and two level cervical disc replacements (prestige) in 32 patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic cervical spondylosis. Dynamic assessment with lateral radiographs of the cervical spine in flexion/extension was done pre and post op. All of them had partial uni/bilateral uncinectomy, which adds in lateral bending. The median age of all patients was 46 years (range 32–61). Levels of surgery included between seven C3–C7, most common were C5–6, C6–7.

Results: Neck and arm pain as well as disability scores (VAS, ODI and SF36) were significantly improved by 3 months and remained improved at 2 years. Radiography revealed the complete motion (From flexion to extension) at upper disc replacement level of 11% and 9.6% at the lower level. There is a significant decrease of the facet joint articulation overlap in the sagittal plane. As the diameter of socket is slightly larger than the ball in prestige disc replacement, it helps in additional axial movement. There was reduction in motion at the adjacent segments above and below, preventing adjacent segment problems.

Conclusion: Twenty-four months after surgery, patients who underwent two level cervical disc replacements demonstrated greater improvement in neurologic function and neck pain. It helps in restoring sagittal balance, functional outcome of patient because of increased lateral bending, axial rotations and flexion-extension.

Ethics approval: done from appropriate authorities

Interest Statement: There is no local grant, national grant, commercial/industry support for this article. There are no interest or gain from any source for this article.

Object: To study the incidence, etiology and management of patients with neuralgia following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF).

Design: A prospective study of 216 patients undergoing PLIF surgery from March 1996 to August 2003.

Subjects: 16 of the 225 patients (7.1%) undergoing PLIF surgery developed new leg pain following surgery.

Results In all patients, the distribution of the postoperative pain was different than the pre-operative pain. Nerve swelling with relative stenosis was the most common cause (9/16), followed by pedicular screw misplacement (2/16), nerve anomaly (2/16), loose posterior arch (2/16), and graft subsidence (1/16).

Nine patients with nerve swelling complained of pain with no neurological findings. One responded to a root block and 6 to re-exploration and further decompression. The patients with misplaced screws woke up from surgery with pain and neurology. The pain responded to removal of screws in both. Two patients with loose posterior arches complained of leg pain while lying down only. These symptoms disappeared after excision of the arches. In 2 patients conjoint roots were found intra-operatively. Both developed post operative pain, which settled down in one. In one patient subsidence of an iliac graft caused pain a few months following surgery and did not respond to further decompression.

Discussion: The overall incidence of post PLIF neuralgia was 7.1%, however by removing the whole facet, as performed in the last 122 patients, the incidence reduced from 9.7% (first 103 patients) to 4.9%. Based on our data we propose a classification system for Post PLIF Neuralgia, and a management plan. Using both, 11 of the 16 patients reported their leg pain disappeared, leaving only 5 patients with residual leg pain (< 3%). Key-stones in avoiding post PLIF neuralgia are generous decompression of the nerve roots, especially the lateral recess above the disc, total facetectomy and removal of graft pieces before closure.

Introduction: Vertebroplasty is an established minimally invasive technique, which provides consistent and sustained pain relief in patients with vertebral fractures. However cement extrusion remains a major problem and has been reported to occur in up to 70% of the cases in some reports. Cement extravasations may occur through the Basivertebral vein, the Segmental vein or through cortical defects. Cement leakage may be Epidural, Anterior, Para-vertebral, Intra-discal or distant. Most often cement leakage is asymptomatic but on occasion it may be a serious complication in the form of Cord compression, pulmonary embolism or Neuralgia.

The incidence of cement leakage can be reduced by the use of high viscosity cement, use of a low pressure injection system, injecting small volumes at each level, introducing the cement under visualization and waiting for cement to set before withdrawing the needle.

Patients and Methods: We describe another technique to help in reduction of cement extrusion.

After satisfactory placement of the Jamshidi needle (used for injecting cement), aspiration is attempted using a 20ml Syringe. A slurry, made of very fine pieces of Gel foam mixed with Omnipaque dye and saline, is injected into the vertebral body. This embolizes the blood channels, which are communicating with the needle. Once no more blood can be aspirated, and no dye is seen extruding into the veins, toothpaste consistency cement is injected under low pressure and fluoroscopic guidance. A post-procedure CT scan was performed in all cases to confirm cement location.

Results: 28 patients underwent PV, 24 of these patients had osteoporotic vertebral fractures and 4 had meta-static lesions. Vertebroplasty was done at 56 symptomatic levels. Using this method, Cement leakage was seen at 12 of the 56 levels operated on (21.4%); at 6 levels leakage was into the adjoining disc, leakage anteriorly was seen at 3 levels, there was 1 leakage into the paravertebral tissues and at 2 levels there was a streak of cement into the vertebral canal in 1 via the venous system and in the other through a cortical defect. None of the leakages were symptomatic. Epidural leakage was seen in 2 patients (3.57%).

Conclusion: A slurry of gelfoam, dye and saline injected prior to cement reduces the incidence of cement extrusion, therefore increasing the safety of this effective procedure.

Object: To study the incidence, etiology and management of patients with neuralgia following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF).

Design: A prospective study of 85 patients undergoing PLIF surgery from March 1996 to March 2001.

Subjects: Seven of the 85 patients undergoing PLIF surgery developed new leg pain between three days and five months following surgery.

Results: The incidence of neuralgia was 8%. In all the patients the post-surgical neuralgia was in a new distribution. MRI examination ruled out misplaced pedicle screws in all cases, but was otherwise unhelpful. One patient developed neuralgia five months post-operatively due to collapse of the cortico-cancellous graft and secondary foraminal narrowing. This was not relieved following surgical decompression. Four patients had neuralgia caused by relative stenosis of the exiting nerve (3) or the traversing nerve (1) which started between three days and two weeks after surgery. The pain was relieved in all four following surgical decompression. One patient had leg pain when lying down; standing and sitting relieved this. A loose lamina was found on exploring the wound. Her pain settled after surgery. One patient developed a spondylolisthesis at the level below a L4/5 PLIF four months after surgery. Her pain was eased by stabilization of the lower segment.

Conclusions: MRI scans are not very helpful in these cases. Early exploration is recommended and gave good results in six of our seven cases.