Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the most effective treatment modality for severe arthritis of the hip. Patients report excellent clinical and functional outcomes following THA, including subjective improvement in gait mechanics. However, few studies in the literature have outlined the impact of surgical approach on gait kinetics and kinematics. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of surgical approach for THA on quantitative gait analysis.

Thirty patients undergoing THA for primary osteoarthritis of the hip were assigned to one of three surgical approaches (10 anterior, 10 posterior, and 10 lateral). A single surgeon performed each individual approach. Each patient received standardised implants at the time of surgery (cementless stem and acetabular component, cobalt chrome femoral head, highly cross-linked liner). Patients underwent 3D gait analysis pre-operatively, and at 6- and 12-weeks following the procedure. At each time point, temporal gait parameters, kinetics, and kinematics were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance.

All three groups were similar with respect to age (p=0.27), body mass index (p=0.16), and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (p=0.66). Temporal parameters including step length, stride length, gait velocity, and percent stance and swing phase were similar between the groups at all time points. The lateral cohort had higher pelvic tilt during stance on the affected leg than the anterior cohort at 6-weeks (p=0.033). Affected leg ipsilateral trunk lean during stance was higher in the lateral group at 6-weeks (p=0.006) and 12-weeks (p=0.037) compared to the other cohorts. The anterior and posterior groups demonstrated an increased external rotation moment at 6-weeks (p=0.001) and 12-weeks (p=0.005) compared to the lateral group.

Although temporal parameters were similar across all groups, some differences in gait kinematics and kinetics exist following THA using different surgical approaches. However, the clinical relevance based on the small magnitude of the differences remains in question.

Purpose: Medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common primary osteoarthritis of the knee, but the treatment of this disease in young patients remains controversial. High tibial osteotomy (HTO), medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are all viable options. Gait analysis is one tool available to clinically assess knee kinematics, and may prove to be a good way of predicting functional outcomes of these different surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the knee kinematics, function, and quality of life of patients that underwent either a medial opening wedge HTO, UKA, or TKA for primary medial compartment OA.

Method: A matched prospective cohort study of patients between the ages of 45 and 65 who had undergone an HTO, UKA, or TKA for primary medial compartment knee OA was undertaken over a 3-year period. Primary outcome measures were gait variables, namely knee adduction moments, as measured through gait analysis. Secondary measures included quality of life (WOMAC), functional performance tests (six minute walk and timed-up-and-go), self-reported functional ability (LEFS), and general health (SF-36). Gait and functional performance tests were evaluated preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Self-reported quality of life, function and general health were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively.

Results: Twenty HTOs, 19 medial UKAs, and 17 TKAs were matched for Kellgren-Lawrence grade of medial OA, age at surgery, and body mass index. Significant differences were observed between the three groups in step length and peak adduction moments at 24 months. Significant differences were observed in preoperative WOMAC pain and function scores, KOOS pain scores, and LEFS, but no significantly different outcome measures were observed postoperatively. Lateral Black-burne-Peel and modified Insall-Salvati ratios were the only significant radiographic differences observed between groups at 24 months.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, no gait analysis study exists comparing the medial opening wedge HTO to UKA or TKA. The results of this study suggest that most gait variables except step length and knee adduction moments are similar between groups. Moreover, except for patellar height, there were no major functional or radiographic differences between these groups.

Purpose: Simultaneous high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been proposed as a treatment for patients with combined medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) and ACL deficiency. Although goals of surgery are to correct malalignment, decrease knee joint load and enable continued participation in sports, few prospective studies evaluating these outcomes exist. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate two-year changes in frontal plane alignment, dynamic knee joint load and self-reported function during sport after simultaneous HTO and ACL reconstruction.

Method: Thirty patients with varus alignment, medial compartment knee OA and ACL deficiency have undergone medial opening wedge HTO and hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction during a single operation. Full-length, standing AP radiographs (mechanical axis angle), dynamic knee joint loads (the peak external adduction moment about the knee during self-paced walking) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS) were completed before and 24 months after surgery.

Results: Based on the 14 patients currently at 24.9 ± 1.67 months postop (12 males; age = 38.5 ± 7.5 yrs.; BMI = 29.5 ± 5.6, median Kellgren and Lawrence grade = 2), mechanical axis angle decreased significantly (p< 0.005) from −6.2 ± 3.63° to 0.29±1.94°. Despite a small (0.06 ± 0.10m/s), but significant (p< 0.05), increase in self-paced walking speed after surgery, the peak knee adduction moment decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 2.96 ± 0.61 %BW*ht to 1.58 ± 0.48 %BW*ht [mean decrease = 1.38 %BW*ht (95% CI: 0.87 – 1.89)]. Each domain of the KOOS also improved significantly (p< 0.05), with the mean sports and recreation domain increasing (p=0.001) from 26.92 ± 24.29 to 66.54 ± 28.09 [mean increase = 39.62 (95% CI: 20.09 – 51.14)]. Data from 30 patients will be available at time of presentation.

Conclusion: Two-year outcomes after simultaneous medial opening wedge HTO and ACL reconstruction suggest this treatment results in substantial improvements in alignment, knee joint load and self-reported functioning during sport.

Create an optimization model of the internal structure of the knee joint to quantify the correlation between external knee adduction moment (M[add]) during gait with the medial-to-lateral ratio of compartment loading (MLR). Patients were examined the week before, and six months after, surgical knee joint realigment with a high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

Thirty patients (six females, twenty-four males; age = 50.0 ± 9.4 yrs.; BMI = 30.0±2.8) with clinically diagnosed OA primarily affecting the medial compartment of the knee underwent a medial opening wedge HTO. Walking gait analysis was performed immediately pre-surgery and at six months post-surgery using optical motion analysis (eight Eagle camera EvaRT system, Motion Analysis Corp, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) and floor-mounted force plate (OR6, AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA). External joint kinetics were calculated using inverse dynamics. Kinematic and force plate data served as input for the internal knee joint model. The anatomical geometry was generic but scaled to patient height and knee alignment. Included were four ligaments (ACL, PCL, LCL, MCL), two contact surfaces (medial and lateral) and eleven muscles (quadriceps, hamstrings, gracilis, sartorius, popliteus and gatrocnemius). A loading solution was found to satisfy mechanical equilibrium and minimise the sum of squares of all structural loads. Output was the ratio of medial-to-lateral compartment compression (MLR). Paired t-tests compared M[add] pre-op versus post-op and MLR pre-op versus post-op. A Pearson R2 coefficient of determination was calculated correlating M[add] to MLR for the pre-operative condition.

Peak M[add] decreased from 2.53 ± 1.32 to 1.63 ± 0.81 [%body weight*ht] (p< 0.001). The peak MLR decreased from 2.63 ± 1.08 to 1.52 ± 0.56 [unit-less] (p< 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between M[add] and MLR with the Pearson R2=0.457 (p=0.014).

These results suggest that adduction moment is an acceptable proxy for quantifying the internal compressive loading in the knee. Even without considering muscle loading and possible co-contraction of antagonists, adduction moment explains nearly half of the variance in the internal loading of the knee joint compartments. However, further research is required with a larger sample size to increase confidence in this proxy measure in a clinical setting.

Previous research suggests knee joint moments and muscle activity during walking are altered in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency and in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). The objective of this study was to compare knee joint flexion and adduction moments and the extent of quadriceps-hamstring muscle co-contraction before and one year after combined simultaneous ACL reconstruction and high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

Eighteen patients (three females, fifteen males; age = 40 ± 8 yrs.; BMI = 28.8 ± 5.77) with ACL deficiency and OA affecting primarily the medial compartment of the knee underwent ACL reconstruction (hamstring autograft) and medial opening wedge HTO procedures during a single operation. All patients completed pre-operative and one-year postoperative quantitative gait assessments. Three-dimensional kinetic and kinematic data were collected during self-paced walking and used to calculate the peak external flexion and adduction moments about the knee. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was collected from the hamstrings and quadriceps and used to calculate the co-contraction ratio. Peak moments and co-contraction ratios were compared pre and postoperatively using paired t-tests.

The peak knee flexion moment decreased from 2.31 ± 1.14 to 1.33 ± 0.73 %BW*ht (p=0.001); mean decrease = 0.98 %BW*ht (95%CI: 0.49–1.47). The peak knee adduction moment decreased from 2.81 ± 0.62 to 1.69 ± 0.61 %BW*ht (p< 0.001); mean decrease = 1.12 %BW*ht (95% CI: 0.80–1.43). The quadriceps-hamstring co-contraction ratio decreased from 0.82 ± 0.14 to 0.72 ± 0.18 (p=0.056); mean decrease = 0.10 (95% CI: −0.003 – 0.21).

The present findings suggest that combined simultaneous ACL reconstruction and HTO significantly decreases knee flexion and adduction moments during walking. Although the present findings suggest that the quadriceps-hamstring co-contraction ratio also decreases, future research with more patients is required to confidently evaluate potential changes in muscle activity. These findings are consistent with an overall reduction in dynamic knee joint load.

Summary Results of this two-group parallel design randomised controlled trial indicated one and two year outcomes following ACL reconstruction were not different in one hundred and fifty patients using either an ACL functional knee brace or neoprene knee sleeve. Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes in patients using an ACL functional knee brace and patients using a neoprene knee sleeve

One hundred and fifty patients were randomised to receive an ACL functional knee brace (n=76) or a neoprene sleeve (n=74) at their six week postoperative visit following primary ACL reconstruction. Patients were instructed to wear the knee orthosis during participation in all physical activities. Patients were assessed preoperatively, six weeks, six, twelve, eighteen and twenty-four months postoperatively. Outcome measures included disease-specific quality of life (ACL QOL), KT 1000 and single limb forward hop test administered by a blinded research assistant. One and two-year outcomes were compared after adjusting for baseline scores. A priori directional subgroup hypotheses based on time from injury to surgery, pre-operative KT 1000 scores, and one and two-year compliance scores were evaluated using tests for interactions. Analysis was completed on an intention-to-treat basis.

There were no significant between-group differences for any of the outcomes at one and two-year follow-ups. Mean between-group differences at two years were: 2.87% (95% CI: −3.85 – 9.60) for the ACL QOL, 0.07mm (95% CI: −0.80 – 0.93) for KT 1000 side-to-side difference, and 2.64% (95% CI: −4.57 – 9.85) for hop limb symmetry index. There were no significant subgroup findings and adverse events were similar between groups.

Confidence intervals for between-group differences are narrow and exclude clinically important differences. These findings suggest a functional knee brace does not result in superior outcomes over a neoprene sleeve following ACL reconstruction.

The peak external knee adduction moment during walking gait has been proposed to be a clinically useful measure of dynamic knee joint load in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, there is limited information about the reliability of this measure, or its ability to detect change. The test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change of peak knee adduction moments were evaluated in thirty patients with varus gonarthrosis. Indices of relative and absolute reliability were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.85, standard error of measurement = 0.36 % BW*Ht), and the sensitivity to change following high tibial osteotomy was high (standardized response mean = 1.2).

To estimate the test-retest reliability, measurement error and sensitivity to change of the peak knee adduction moment during gait.

Thirty patients (44”11 yrs, 1.7”0.09 m, 87”20 kg, twenty males, ten females) with varus gonarthrosis underwent gait analyses on two pre-operative test occasions within one week, and on a third test occasion six months after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic gait data were collected during self-paced walking and used to calculate the peak knee adduction moment.

An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.71, 0.93) indicated excellent relative reliability, and a standard error of measurement of 0.36 %BW*Ht (95%CI: 0.29, 0.49) indicated low measurement error. The peak knee adduction moment after surgery (1.66”0.72 %BW*Ht) was significantly (p< 0.001) lower than before surgery (2.58”0.72 %BW*Ht). A standardized response mean of 1.2 (95%CI: 0.77, 1.6) indicated the size of this change was large.

Based on 95% confidence levels, these results suggest the error in an individual’s peak knee adduction moment at one point in time is 0.70 % BW*Ht, the minimal detectable change in an individual’s peak adduction moment is 1.0 %BW*Ht, and it is sensitive to change following treatment.

The peak knee adduction moment during gait has appropriate reliability for use in studies evaluating the effect of treatments intended to decrease the load on the knee. When considering measurement error, the knee adduction moment is also appropriate for clinical use in evaluating change in individual patients.

Funding: CIHR, Arthrex Inc.