Customised individually made implants(CIM) total knee arthroplasty(TKA) are custom-made to better fit patients native anatomy and aim to improve outcomes which can be variable with conventional off-the-shelf(OTS). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted searching the MEDLINE and Embase databases. Studies reporting on patient reported outcome measures, clinical or radiological outcomes were included. 23 studies satisfied the search criteria (case-control studies14, case series8, cross-sectional studies1). There were 2,856(CIM) and 1,877(OTS) implants. The overall revision-rate was higher in CIM 5.9%vs3.7%OTS [OR 1.46(95% CI 0.82–2.62)]. MUA was higher in the CIM group 2.2%vs.1.1%OTS [OR 2.95(95% CI 0.95–9.13)] and overall complications rate was also higher in the CIM group 5% vs. 4.5%OTS [OR 1.45(95% CI 0.53–3.96)]. LOS was significantly shorter in the CIM group 2.9 days vs. 3.5 days [MD −0.51(95% CI −0.82–0.20)]. Pooled analysis for KSS showed no difference between CIM and OTS groups(Knee=90.5 vs. 90.6 [MD-0.27,(95% CI −4.27–3.73)] and Function=86.1 vs. 90.6[MD 1.51 (95% CI −3.69–6.70)] component of the scores. There was no significant difference in post-operative ROM between CIM and OTS groups 117.3° vs. 115.0° [MD 0.02,(95% CI −1.70–1.74)]. CIM TKAs has theoretical benefits over OTS TKAs however in this review they were associated with higher complication, MUA and revision rates with no difference in outcome scores and no improvement in target alignment. The findings of this review does not support the use of CIM over OTS prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.Abstract
There are several imaging-based measurements for patello-femoral height. Available methods rely predominantly on sagittal images. The latter can be misleading with sagittal oblique slices and when the patella is tilted and/or chronically subluxed. In this study we describe a simple method of patellar height measurement using axial MRI overlap. A retrospective observational analysis of 97 knees from 251 patients was conducted. Cases were selected following the exclusion of scans with fractures, massive effusion, patello-femoral pathology. Axial patello-trochlear overlap (APTO) was measured on the axial MRI images as follows: (1) Patellar length (P): expressed as the number of axial images showing patellar articular surface (2) Trochlear overlap (T): the number of axial images showing overlap between patellar articular surface and articular surface of lateral trochlea. APTO is the ratio T/P. All measurements were carried out independently and on two separate occasions by 6 raters. As a control conventional patello-trochlear index were measured for all patients by a senior musculoskeletal radiologist.Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
