Our primary aim was to describe migration of the Exeter stem with a 32 mm head on highly crosslinked polyethylene and whether this is influenced by age. Our secondary aims were to assess functional outcome, satisfaction, activity, and bone mineral density (BMD) according to age. A prospective cohort study was conducted. Patients were recruited into three age groups: less than 65 years (n = 65), 65 to 74 years (n = 68), and 75 years and older (n = 67). There were 200 patients enrolled in the study, of whom 115 were female and 85 were male, with a mean age of 69.9 years (sd 9.5, 42 to 92). They were assessed preoperatively, and at three, 12 and, 24 months postoperatively. Stem migration was assessed using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA). Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), EuroQol-5 domains questionnaire (EQ-5D), short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36,) and patient satisfaction were used to assess outcome. The Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and activPAL monitor (energy expelled, time lying/standing/walking and step count) were used to assess activity. The BMD was assessed in Gruen and Charnley zones.Objectives
Patients and Methods
Cemented stems have shown 90–100% survivorship when coupled with polyethylene acetabular component. This study aims to compare cemented stem behaviour in combination with large metal on metal (MOM) vs. metal on poly (MOP) bearings. 100 patients were recruited into a single centre RCT (we required 40 in each group for power .90 to confirm stem subsidence of >0.5mm at 2 years; p< 0.05). Recruits were randomized to MOP (28mm) or MOM femoral heads with CPCS cemented femoral stem. Assessments included X-rays (AP pelvis), Harris Hip Scores, blood metal ion levels and patient questionnaires (WOMAC, SF-36, satisfaction questionnaire). Evaluations were done pre-operatively and 3, 12 and 24 months post operatively; blood metal ion measures at 1 year.Introduction
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to investigate the
possible benefit of large-head metal-on-metal bearing on a stem
for primary hip replacement compared with a 28 mm diameter conventional
metal-on-polyethylene bearing in a prospective randomised controlled
trial. We investigated cemented stem behaviour between these two
different bearings using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse, clinical and
patient reported measures (Harris hip score, Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, Short Form-36 and satisfaction)
and whole blood metal ion levels at two years. A power study indicated
that 50 hips were needed in each group to detect subsidence of >
5 mm at two years with a
p-value of <
0.05. Significant improvement (p <
0.001) was found in the mean
clinical and patient reported outcomes at two years for both groups.
Comparison of outcomes between the groups at two years showed no
statistically significant difference for mean stem migration, clinical
and patient reported outcomes; except overall patient satisfaction which
was higher for metal-on-metal group (p = 0.05). Metal ion levels
were raised above the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency advised safety level (7 µg per litre) in 20% of the metal-on-metal
group and in one patient in metal-on-polyethylene group (who had
a metal-on-metal implant on the contralateral side). Two patients
in the metal-on-metal group were revised, one for pseudotumour and
one for peri-prosthetic fracture. Use of large modular heads is associated with a risk of raised
whole blood metal ion levels despite using a proven bearing from
resurfacing. The head-neck junction or excess stem micromotion are
possibly the weak links warranting further research.
