Aim

To use Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to determine the effectiveness of lumbar spinal surgery at a single UK institution.

Hip fractures accounts to about 86000 cases per annum in UK. AP and Lateral radiographs form an essential investigation in planning the management of these fractures. Recently it has been suggested that lateral view doesn't provide any additional information in majority of the cases. We looked retrospectively at 25 consecutive radiographs with intracapsular and extracapsular fracture neck of femur each presenting to our department between May 2010 and January 2011. These radiographs were put on the CD in 2 folders as AP and Lateral. It was reviewed by 2 Observers who suggested their preferred treatment. The results were compared for the intra observer agreement to assess the necessity of the lateral view of the radiographs. We also compared the treatment options with the gold standard and looked at the interobserver agreement. Of the 50 set of radiographs that were reviewed, Observer 1 had disagreed with himself on one occasion (98%agreement) compared to the Observer 2 who had two disagreements (96% agreement). When analyzing the intracapsular fractures, we found 100% agreement of OBSERVER 1 with himself when proposing treatment on AP and Lateral View. Whereas, OBSERVER 2 had only one disagreement. It gave us a Free marginal kappa value of more than 0.70 indicating excellent agreement. One difference doesn't have any statistical significance. In the extracapsular fractures, Kappa values ranged from 0.413 to 0.88. OBSERVER 1 did change his opinion after reviewing the lateral view but generally had good outcome (K=0.88). Whereas, the opinion of OBSERVER 2 was unaffected by the Lateral view. The X-ray diagnoses by OBSERVER 1 and OBSERVER 2 had only moderate agreement (K=0.52 (AP) and 0.57 (Lat). Comparing the observer opinion to the gold standard (operation performed) showed moderate agreement both on AP and Lateral view (OBSERVER 1 AP and Lat both K=0.64, OBSERVER 2 AP and Lat both K=0.41). The Lateral view failed to change the opinion of the observers (K > 0.7) but there was moderate to excellent agreement between the observers and observer vs operation (The Gold Standard) with kappa value of more than 0.52. We feel that the Lateral view doesn't make any difference in most of the cases as shown by a good intra-observer agreement. However, we cannot completely rule out their importance and they should be performed in occult fractures, pathological fractures, fractures extending into the shaft, young patients, and on the request of physician.

The availability and usage of portable image intensifiers has revolutionised routine orthopaedic practice. Many procedures have become simpler, easier, less invasive and less time-consuming. Extensive use of fluoroscopy can, however, result in significant radiation exposure to operating staff. An accumulated dose of 65 (Sv after multiple exposures has been reported to increase the risk of thyroid cancer many years later. Previous studies have shown that it is possible to exceed this dose during various orthopaedic procedures. Though thyroid shields are extensively available most orthopaedic surgeons do not use them. The present study was aimed at measuring the scattered dose to thyroid during DHS/IMHS for neck of femur fractures and IM nailing for long bone fractures and thereby emphasise the need for operating theatre personnel to wear a thyroid shield.

A prospective study of 32 consecutive procedures was carried out. The EDD Unfors dosimeter was used to measure the tissue specific exposure dose to thyroid. Measurements were also obtained from the mobile C-arm fluoroscope unit, which calculated the total number of images and the total dose and duration of radiation for each procedure. Other factors including the grade of surgeon, the total number of theatre personnel wearing the lead gown and/or the thyroid shield and the duration of surgery were also recorded.

In 32 procedures, the dose of 65 (Sv was exceeded 13 times; 8 times during DHS/IMHS and 5 times during IMN. The average thyroid dose was 142 (Sv during IMN and 55 (Sv during DHS. Only 9 of 223 (4%) theatre personnel were using a thyroid shield in spite of its availability. The results suggest that the thyroid is frequently exposed to potentially harmful radiation during these procedures. Strict inclusion of a thyroid shield as a part of routine radiation protection is recommended.

Intra-articular steroid injection has been widely used for relief of pain in Osteoarthritis. Recent studies show an increasing rate of infection in these patients following hip arthroplasty. We have reviewed our cohort of patients to see if they are susceptible to higher infection rate.

We reviewed a cohort of 167 consecutive hips that had at least one injection with a 40mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4ml 0.5% bupivacaine mixture to relieve the symptoms of hip osteoarthritis or to clarify a diagnosis of hip arthritis between January 1997 and Novem-ber 2004 were reviewed. A total of 37 hips (36 patients) that subsequently proceeded to have a total hip arthroplasty were selected as our study group. There was a minimum of a one-year follow up.

The rate of infection in our initial cohort of patients following a hip injection was 0.60% (1 hip) which resulted in repeated washouts and a subsequent total hip arthroplasty with a good outcome. On review of the 37 hips, one was revised due to a deep infection secondary to staphylococcus epidermidis. Four were revised for continued instability and pain with no evidence of infection either prior to or during revision. When deep infection is taken as an endpoint, cumulative survival at 7.5 years is 0.968 (95% confidence interval of 1 to 0.905). The total survivorship of this cohort if all revisions are included is 0.852 at 7.5 years (95% confidence interval of 0.730 to 0.974). The revision rate due to a deep infection in our study is 2.7%.

We conclude that patients who have a total hip arthroplasty after a hip injection do not have an adversely high rate of deep infection.

This aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Plant Tan plate, a new implant introduced for comminuted proximal humerus fractures. This paper presents the results of 10 patients who underwent the procedure over a two year period.

Methods : Two and three part proximal humeral fractures continue to be a difficult problem and accurate fixation is necessary for optimum functional outcome.

Ten patient had plant Tan plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures from January 2002 till January 2004. Details including patient demographics, the type of fracture, the bone quality, significant co morbid factors, the surgical approach union rate and complications were noted. Outcome was assessed using the Constant score and comparing with the opposite side and the Oxford shoulder questionnaire.

Results : After an average follow up of 6 months, 80% of the patients were satisfied with the result of surgery at the time of the most recent examination. The union rate was 85 %. The significant complications were infection ( 20 % ) and the development of avascular necrosis (1/10). The screw penetration into the shoulder joint was found to be as high as 50 % though it was not associated with poor result.

Conclusion : The early results of the Plant Tan plate are encouraging with good functional results in most patients. Careful case selection with proper indication, accurate reduction, and subchondral screw placement with purchase in the inferior portion of the humeral head along with early mobilisation should be considered as key factors for better outcome.