Hip fractures accounts to about 86000 cases per annum in UK. AP and Lateral radiographs form an essential investigation in planning the management of these fractures. Recently it has been suggested that lateral view doesn't provide any additional information in majority of the cases. We looked retrospectively at 25 consecutive radiographs with intracapsular and extracapsular fracture neck of femur each presenting to our department between May 2010 and January 2011. These radiographs were put on the CD in 2 folders as AP and Lateral. It was reviewed by 2 Observers who suggested their preferred treatment. The results were compared for the intra observer agreement to assess the necessity of the lateral view of the radiographs. We also compared the treatment options with the gold standard and looked at the interobserver agreement. Of the 50 set of radiographs that were reviewed, Observer 1 had disagreed with himself on one occasion (98%agreement) compared to the Observer 2 who had two disagreements (96% agreement). When analyzing the intracapsular fractures, we found 100% agreement of OBSERVER 1 with himself when proposing treatment on AP and Lateral View. Whereas, OBSERVER 2 had only one disagreement. It gave us a Free marginal kappa value of more than 0.70 indicating excellent agreement. One difference doesn't have any statistical significance. In the extracapsular fractures, Kappa values ranged from 0.413 to 0.88. OBSERVER 1 did change his opinion after reviewing the lateral view but generally had good outcome (K=0.88). Whereas, the opinion of OBSERVER 2 was unaffected by the Lateral view. The X-ray diagnoses by OBSERVER 1 and OBSERVER 2 had only moderate agreement (K=0.52 (AP) and 0.57 (Lat). Comparing the observer opinion to the gold standard (operation performed) showed moderate agreement both on AP and Lateral view (OBSERVER 1 AP and Lat both K=0.64, OBSERVER 2 AP and Lat both K=0.41). The Lateral view failed to change the opinion of the observers (K > 0.7) but there was moderate to excellent agreement between the observers and observer vs operation (The Gold Standard) with kappa value of more than 0.52. We feel that the Lateral view doesn't make any difference in most of the cases as shown by a good intra-observer agreement. However, we cannot completely rule out their importance and they should be performed in occult fractures, pathological fractures, fractures extending into the shaft, young patients, and on the request of physician.

The availability and usage of portable image intensifiers has revolutionised routine orthopaedic practice. Many procedures have become simpler, easier, less invasive and less time-consuming. Extensive use of fluoroscopy can, however, result in significant radiation exposure to operating staff. An accumulated dose of 65 (Sv after multiple exposures has been reported to increase the risk of thyroid cancer many years later. Previous studies have shown that it is possible to exceed this dose during various orthopaedic procedures. Though thyroid shields are extensively available most orthopaedic surgeons do not use them. The present study was aimed at measuring the scattered dose to thyroid during DHS/IMHS for neck of femur fractures and IM nailing for long bone fractures and thereby emphasise the need for operating theatre personnel to wear a thyroid shield.

A prospective study of 32 consecutive procedures was carried out. The EDD Unfors dosimeter was used to measure the tissue specific exposure dose to thyroid. Measurements were also obtained from the mobile C-arm fluoroscope unit, which calculated the total number of images and the total dose and duration of radiation for each procedure. Other factors including the grade of surgeon, the total number of theatre personnel wearing the lead gown and/or the thyroid shield and the duration of surgery were also recorded.

In 32 procedures, the dose of 65 (Sv was exceeded 13 times; 8 times during DHS/IMHS and 5 times during IMN. The average thyroid dose was 142 (Sv during IMN and 55 (Sv during DHS. Only 9 of 223 (4%) theatre personnel were using a thyroid shield in spite of its availability. The results suggest that the thyroid is frequently exposed to potentially harmful radiation during these procedures. Strict inclusion of a thyroid shield as a part of routine radiation protection is recommended.