Despite the high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders seen by primary care physicians, numerous studies have demonstrated deficiencies in the adequacy of musculoskeletal education at multiple stages of medical education. The aim of this study was to assess a newly developed undergraduate module in musculoskeletal medicine. A two-week module in musculoskeletal medicine was designed to cover common musculoskeletal disorders that are typically seen in primary care. A previously validated examination in musculoskeletal medicine was used to assess the cognitive knowledge of ninety-two students on completion of the module. A historical control group (seventy-two students) from a prior course was used for comparison. The new module group (2009) performed significantly better than the historical (2006) control group in terms of score (62.3% versus 54.3%, respectively; p < 0.001) and pass rate (38.4% versus 12.5%, respectively; p = 0.0002). In a subgroup analysis of the new module group, students who enrolled in the graduate entry program (an accelerated four-year curriculum consisting of students who have already completed an undergraduate university degree) were more likely to perform better in terms of average score (72.2% versus 57%, respectively; p < 0.001) and pass rates (70.9% versus 21.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) compared with students who had enrolled via the traditional undergraduate route. In terms of satisfaction rates, the new module group reported a significantly higher satisfaction rate than that reported by the historical control group (63% versus 15%, respectively; p < 0.001).Methods
Results
Conservative management remains the gold standard for many fractures of the humeral diaphysis with union rates of over 90% often quoted. Success with closed management however is not universal. A retrospective review of all conservatively managed fractures between 2001 and 2005 was undertaken to investigate a suspected high non-union rate and identify possible causes. The overall non-union rate was 39.2% (11 of 28 cases). There was no difference in axial distraction at presentation, however following application of cast there was significantly more distraction in the non-union group (1.2 v 5.09mm, p<0.01). All humeral fractures were admitted, lightweight U-slabs were applied by a technician, distraction was avoided, patients abstained from NSAIDS, consultant reviewed radiographs before discharge and patients were converted early to functional brace.Phase 1
Changes to practise
Abduction braces are commonly prescribed following the closed reduction of a dislocated prosthetic hip joint. Their use is controversial with limited evidence to support their use. We have conducted a retrospective review of dislocations in primary total hip replacements over a nine year period and report redislocation rates in patients braced, compared to those who were not. 67 patients were identified. 69% of those patients who were braced had a subsequent dislocation. Likewise 69% of those who did not receive a brace re-dislocated. 33% of patients that were braced dislocated whilst wearing the brace. Bracing was associated with patient discomfort, sleep disturbance, skin irritation and breakdown. Small femoral head size, monoblock femoral components and poor biomechanical reconstruction was prevalent amongst dislocators. Abduction bracing following closed reduction of a total hip replacement is costly(e950), does not prevent redislocation and may be the cause of considerable morbidity to the patient.
Abduction braces are commonly prescribed following the closed reduction of a dislocated prosthetic hip joint. Their use is controversial with limited evidence to support their use. We have conducted a retrospective review of dislocations in primary total hip replacements over a nine year period and report redislocation rates in patients braced, compared to those who were not. 67 patients were identified. 69% of those patients who were braced had a subsequent dislocation. Likewise 69% of those who did not receive a brace re-dislocated. 33% of patients that were braced dislocated whilst wearing the brace. Bracing was associated with patient discomfort, sleep disturbance, skin irritation and breakdown. Small femoral head size, monoblock femoral components and poor biomechanical reconstruction was prevalent amongst dislocators. Abduction bracing following closed reduction of a total hip replacement does not prevent redislocation and may be the cause of considerable morbidity to the patient.
There was a strong correlation between the length of time spent in the hanging cast and a high rate of non-union. The average length of time spent in cast for the non-union group was 48 days as opposed to 30.9days in the group that went onto unite (p=0.0601) There was a statistically significant correlation between non-union and the radiographic degree of distraction at the time of first application of hanging cast (p=0.016) and also at the six week check (p=0.001). Other factors associated with a poor outcome were the degree of varus angulation at presentation (p=0.0078), male sex, right humerus, dominant side, older age group, high energy injury, NSAID use, significant co-morbidities and associated injuries.
Each shear test was then repeated at four different normal loads so as to generate a family of stress-strain graphs. The Mohr-Coulomb failure envelope from which the shear strength and interlocking vales are derived was plotted for each test.
We assessed a new knotless anchor system (Opus AutoCuff, ArthroCare Sports Medicine), which was designed to repair torn rotator cuffs. This knotless anchor winches cuff tissue into the bone with a mattress suture that is cinched into place without the need for knots. We reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic repair with this technique with a minimum follow up of one year. This is prospective study of a consecutive series of the first one hundred patients who underwent arthroscopic cuff repair with the Autocuff system in 2005. Nine were lost to follow-up leaving ninety-one were available for review. All sizes of cuff tear were addressed and in all one hundred and eighty anchors were deployed. There were thirty seven men and sixty seven women with an average age of 69.4 years (range 36–85 years) Follow-up was by clinical assessment, cuff ultrasound and plain radiographs one year after surgery (12–20 months). Pain relief was described as good to excellent in 93% of patients and Constant scores improved by an average of 34 points with 48.5% being good to excellent, 39.4% fair and 12.1% poor. Nine anchors (5%) in eight patients had pulled out at one year, of which three were symptomatic. Suture repair poses varied points of weakness; loose knots, suture attrition and screw toggle all contribute to failure. We have shown that cuff repair by this method appears to be effective up to one year. It is important, however, to spread the tension of the repair with more than one anchor when treating larger tears.
Introduced in 2005, the Opus Magnum (Arthrocare) anchor has been used in our unit for repair of rotator cuff tears. It is a non-screw type anchor which relies on the deployment of wings locked in the subchondral bone. In order to evaluate whether these anchors migrate after implantation we undertook radiographic examination of their placement at intervals. We attempted to assess whether loss of fixation could be secondary to osteoporosis. Between 2005 and 2006, 106 patients (59 female, 47 male) aged 35–84 years (average age 62 years) underwent arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears with a total of 229 anchors. A review of radiographs taken at six weeks and 12 months post-insertion was undertaken. Cortical index of the proximal humeral diaphysis was measured from the AP radiograph indicating bone density; this involved measuring humeral width and medullary cavity diameter at a fixed point of 10cm below the greater tuberosity of the humerus. At six weeks follow-up there were no anchor pull-outs seen on radiographs. At 12 months follow-up 10 of the 229 anchors were found to have pulled out of the bone, equating to a failure rate of 4%. Of these seven of the 10 patients were asymptomatic. The average cortical index was found to be significantly lower in the failure group. Bone quality at the greater tuberosity of the humerus can be insufficient to withstand the tensions developed in newer anchor technology, leading to anchor migration. We present evidence that radiographs may be sufficient to influence the clinician’s choice of anchorage device. An economic estimation of bone density would be a helpful predictor of pull-out strength of suture anchors, essentially a low cortical index would indicate that these anchors are more likely to fail. A routine radiograph at 12 months would also identify the asymptomatic anchor failures.