The purpose of this study was to examine five-year outcomes of patients previously enrolled in a non-operative rotator cuff study.

Patients with chronic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears (demonstrated on imaging) who were referred to one of two senior shoulder surgeons were enrolled in the study between October 2008 and September 2010. Patients participated in a comprehensive non-operative, home-based treatment program. After three months patients were defined as “successful” or “failed”. “Successful” patients were essentially asymptomatic and did not require surgery. “Failed” patients were symptomatic and consented to surgical repair. All patients were followed up at one year, two years, and five-plus years.

Original results of our study showed that 75% of patients were treated successfully with non-operative treatment, while 25% went on to surgery. These numbers were maintained at two-year follow-up (previously reported) and five-year follow-up. At five+ years, 88 patients were contacted for follow-up. Fifty-eight (66%) responded. The non-operative success group had a mean RC-QOL score of 80 (SD 18) at previously reported two-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up this score did not decrease (RCQOL = 82 (SD 16)). Furthermore, between two and five years, only two patients who had previously been defined as “successful” became more symptomatic and underwent surgical rotator cuff repair. From the original cohort of patients, those who failed non-operative treatment and underwent surgical repair had a mean RC-QOL score of 89 (SD 12) at five-year follow-up. The operative and non-operative groups at five-year follow-up were not significantly different (p = 0.07).

Non-operative treatment is an effective and lasting option for many patients with a chronic, full-thickness rotator cuff tear. While some may argue that non-operative treatment delays inevitable surgical fixation, our study shows that patients can do extremely well over time.

Purpose: A major issue in the Canadian health care system are the extensive wait times for consultation with an orthopaedic surgeon. We identified that a high percentage of patients referred to shoulder surgery sub-specialists for chronic full thickness rotator cuff tears had not undergone appropriate non-operative treatment prior to being referred, and ultimately did not require surgery. In an effort to improve the referral process and to optimize patient care, we sought to identify clinical predictors for outcome of non-operative treatment of chronic full-thickness rotator cuff tears. This would allow general practitioners to clearly identify patients who are most likely to fail non-operative treatment and actually require surgical consultation. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if the outcome of non-operative treatment in chronic, symptomatic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears could be predicted based upon presenting clinical characteristics, including: age, dominant extremity involvement, gender, duration of symptoms, onset (acute or chronic), forward elevation range of motion, external rotation strength, size of tear, smoking status, and the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Questionnaire score (RCQOL).

Method: Fifty patients, between the ages of 40 and 85 years, with a documented full-thickness tear on ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were recruited prospectively. They underwent a three month home-based program of non-operative treatment under the supervision of an experienced physiotherapist and sport medicine physician. At the conclusion of the three month program, patients were evaluated by an orthopaedic surgeon and were defined as having been successful or as having failed non-operative treatment. Successful patients declined surgical treatment after consulting with the surgeon, whereas failed patients elected to undergo surgery, or, if avoiding surgery for other health or “life” reasons, had not experienced adequate improvement with the non-operative program to have been considered successful. The patient’s baseline clinical characteristics were analyzed using logistic regression to determine which characteristics were predictive of outcome.

Results: Thirty-eight of 50 (76%) of patients were successful with the non-operative program. Univariate analysis showed that a patient’s Rotator Cuff Quality of Life questionnaire score was a significant predictor of outcome of non-operative treatment (p = 0.017). Patients who were successful with non-operative treatment had a mean baseline RCQOL score of 49/100, whereas patients who failed non-operative treatment had a mean baseline RCQOL score of 31/100. The two factors of patient age and dominant extremity involvement also trended toward significance.

Conclusion: Baseline RCQOL score can predict which patients will be successful with non-operative treatment and which patients will fail non-operative treatment for a chronic, full-thickness rotator cuff tear.