The UK National Joint Registry(NJR) has not reported total knee replacement (TKR)survivorship based on design philosophy alone, unlike its international counterparts. We report outcomes of implant survivorship based on design philosophy using data from NJR's 2020 annual report. All TKR implants with an identifiable design philosophy from NJR data were included. Cumulative revision data for cruciate-retaining(CR), posterior stabilised(PS), mobile-bearing(MB) design philosophies was derived from merged NJR data. Cumulative revision data for individual brands of implants with the medial pivot(MP) philosophy were used to calculate overall survivorship for this design philosophy. The all-cause revision was used as the endpoint and calculated to 15 years follow-up with Kaplan-Meier curves.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Access to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is sometimes restricted for patients with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2). This study compares the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) associated with TKA in patients with a BMI above and below 40 kg/m2 to examine whether this is supported. This single-centre study compared 169 consecutive patients with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) (mean age 65.2 years (40 to 87); mean BMI 44.2 kg/m2 (40 to 66); 129/169 female) undergoing unilateral TKA to a propensity score matched (age, sex, preoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS)) cohort with a BMI < 40 kg/m2 in a 1:1 ratio. Demographic data, comorbidities, and complications to one year were recorded. Preoperative and one-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were completed: EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), OKS, pain, and satisfaction. Using national life expectancy data with obesity correction and the 2020 NHS National Tariff, QALYs (discounted at 3.5%), and direct medical costs accrued over a patient’s lifetime, were calculated. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was used to model variation in cost/QALY for each cohort across 1,000 simulations.Aims
Methods
We prospectively reviewed 2440 Cemented Anantomical (side specific) AGC total knee replacements performed on 2074 patients between 2002 and 2008 in our unit. The surgery was performed by a number of surgeons, both Consultant and Trainee grades. 1357 underwent PCL sacrificing surgery with implantation of Posterior Stabilised Femoral Implant (Cam and Grove) and 1083 underwent PCL retaining surgery with implantation of a Non-Stabilised Femoral Implant. The mean age at date of surgery for Posterior Stabilised prosthesis was 69 years (range 23-94) and Non-Posterior Stabilised prosthesis was 70 (range 33-97) with no significant difference p< 0.05 (C.I 95%). Follow up at present mean 4 years (range 1-6 years). 11 patients underwent secondary patella resurfaced for anterior knee pain at a mean of 1.5 years following the index procedure (range 0.5-4.1 years) with 6 patients reporting a marked improvement in anterior knee pain post operatively. 3 patients underwent removal of patella buttons for symptomatic loosening at a mean of 2.7 years follow index procedure. A total of 17 patients underwent a revision of either tibial or femoral components (0.7%). Indications for revision were infection in 11 patients, gross instability in 1 patient, periprosthetic fracture in 1 patient, persistent stiffness in 1 patient. 3 patients underwent revision for symptomatic loosening of the tibial component at a mean of 2.9 years (range 1.1-4.0). These short to medium term results for the Anatomic AGC total knee replacement agree with published results from other centres.
Before proceeding to longer-term studies, we have studied the early clinical results of a new mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis in comparison with an established fixed-bearing device. Patients requiring bilateral knee replacement consented to have their operations under one anaesthetic using one of each prosthesis. They also agreed to accept the random choice of knee (right or left) and to remain ignorant as to which side had which implant. Outcomes were measured using the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and determination of the range of movement and pain scores before and at one year after operation. Preoperatively, there was no systematic difference between the right and left knees. One patient died in the perioperative period and one mobile-bearing prosthesis required early revision for dislocation of the meniscal component. At one year the mean AKSS, OKS and pain scores for the new device were slightly better (p <
0.025) than those for the fixed-bearing device. There was no difference in the range of movement. We believe that this is the first controlled, blinded trial to compare early function of a new knee prosthesis with that of a standard implant. It demonstrates a small but significant clinical advantage for the mobile-bearing design.
