Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 216 - 216
1 Jul 2014
Melnyk A Wen T Chak J Kelly A Cripton P Fisher C Dvorak M Oxland T
Full Access

Summary Statement

Spinal flexibility in bending and axial torque has been shown to exhibit very modest changes with advancing disc degeneration. This study is the first to address the possible relationship in pure anterior shear and no clear relationship was observed.

Introduction

Disc degeneration (DD) is a risk factor for low back pain. Stable or unstable spine segments may be treated with an isolated decompression or instrumented stabilization, respectively. The effect of DD on spinal flexibility has been addressed by several groups in bending but not in shear; a highly relevant load direction in the lumbar spine is anterior shear. The objective of our study was to determine the effect of DD on anterior translation and specimen stiffness under shear loading in an in vitro model of degenerative spondylolisthesis.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 564 - 564
1 Nov 2011
Melnyk A Kingwell SP Zhu Q Chak J Dvorak MF Oxland TR
Full Access

Purpose: At present there is no reported, valid and reproducible model of degenerative spondylolisthesis for biomechanical testing of spinal implants. The purpose of this study was to create a single functional spinal unit (FSU) model that could demonstrate anterolisthesis consistent with low grade degenerative spondylolisthesis under physiologic shear loads.

Method: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric, lumbar FSU’s were potted and secured in a custom jig for pure shear testing. The cranial segment was loaded from – 50N (posterior) to 250N (anterior) over three cycles for each of five test conditions with a 300N preload. Test conditions addressed known restraints to shear translation and were performed in the same order for all specimens, and included: intact, facet capsulectomy and bilateral two mm facet gap, bilateral four mm facet gap, nucleotomy, and annular release. Three-dimensional motion was recorded using an optoelectronic camera system.

Results: Mean anterior translation at 250N for the five test conditions was 0.7 mm (95% confidence interval 0.4 to 0.9), 1.2 mm (0.9 to 1.6), 1.5 mm (1.1 to 2.0), 1.9 mm (1.4 to 2.4) and 3.1 mm (2.2 to 4.0). The mean maximum anterior translation was significantly different for each test condition with two exceptions. The four mm facet gap did not result in a significantly different maximum anterior translation compared to the two mm facet gap or the nucleotomy. There were no differences in off-axis motion (lateral or superior-inferior translation, flexion-extension, axial rotation, lateral bending) between the five test conditions.

Conclusion: Anterior translation consistent with low grade degenerative spondylolisthesis was repeatedly demonstrated under physiologic shear loads using this model. All sequential destabilizations preserved anatomy critical for the application of pedicle screw constructs, interbody devices and interspinous spacers. As such, this model is appropriate for biomechanical testing of implants currently used in the treatment of low grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.