Active patients may benefit from surgical repair of the achilles tendon with the aim of preserving functional length and optimising push-off power. A mini-open device assisted technique has the potential to reduce wound complications, but risks nerve injury. We present the largest published series of midsubstance achilles tendon repairs using the Achillon® device. A prospective cohort study was run at the Princess Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital between 2008 and 2015. We included all patients who presented with a midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture within 2 weeks of injury, and device assisted mini-open repair was offered to a young active adult population. All patients in the conservative and surgical treatment pathway had the same functional rehabilitation protocol with a plaster for 2 weeks, and a VACOped boot in reducing equinus for a further 8 weeks.Introduction
Methods
The aim of this study was two-fold; firstly, to investigate the construct validity of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score in patients following injuries to the upper and lower limbs, and to confirm that DASH score does not measure disability solely attributed to the upper limb. Secondly, to create a modified DASH questionnaire (M2 DASH) with fewer questions that can discriminate clearly between disabilities due to problems at the upper limb, and is more specific to the upper limb. Patients were asked to fill in the DASH questionnaire in a fracture clinic following ethical approval. This included upper limb injuries (79), lower limb injuries (61) and control subjects (52). The median DASH scores for the three groups were 57, 16 and one respectively. The DASH scores varied significantly between the three groups (Kruskal-Wallis: p<
0.001); the scores for the upper limb group were higher than the lower limb group, and the scores for the lower limb group was higher than the control group (Mann-Whitney: p<
0.001). The M2 DASH questionnaire was developed using questions specific to the upper limb and included questions 1–4, 6, 13–17, 21–23 and 26–30. The median M2 DASH scores for the three groups were 50, 7 and 0 respectively. The revised questionnaire score was then calculated for the upper limb group and a correlation study showed good correlation between the two questionnaires. Our study shows that the original DASH questionnaire is not specific for the upper limb. This has important implications in measuring response in injuries and disease that involve both upper and lower limbs. We have devised a revised questionnaire that we suggest is referred to as M2 DASH questionnaire. The M2 DASH questionnaire has the advantage of being more specific for the upper limb than the DASH questionnaire.
