Cut-off values with highest sensitivity and specificity
for the synovial fluid white cell and differential count will facilitate
the accurate diagnosis of infection in total knee (TKR) and total
hip replacement (THR). All patients undergoing revision TKR or THR
for suspected prosthetic joint infection between 2009 and 2011 at
two hospitals were identified. A total of 75 patients were included
with a mean age of 70.3 years (38 to 89). Synovial fluid was aspirated
pre-operatively and peri-prosthetic tissue samples were taken intra-operatively
for histological and microbiological examination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots were constructed
for white cell and differential counts in aspirated fluid. The optimal
cut-off for TKR and THR was 1590 white cells/µl and 65% neutrophilia.
The white cell count cut-off value identified for THR was notably
lower than previously quoted in the literature. A cut-off value
for white cell count in synovial aspirate in suspected prosthetic
joint infection of between 1100 and 1700 white cells/µl is likely
to be applicable to both THR and TKR. Cite this article:
The advent of double bundle ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) reconstruction had been hailed as potentially allowing for more anatomically and physiologically functioning graft, however until recently there had been little evidence of enhanced functional outcomes. The aim of this study is to explore whether the dimensions of hamstring two strand single bundle grafts, are predictive of the combined four strand single bundle graft that results from combining the single bundle grafts, as well as the impact of double bundle grafts upon the available healing and attachment area within the bony tunnels. Grafts of all likely two strand single bundle graft sizes, measured to the nearest 0.5mm in diameter using unslotted sizing block, were prepared using porcine flexor tendons,. These two strand single bundles were then systematically combined, and re-measured. By geometrical calculation, the sum of the circumferences of the two, two strand double bundle grafts were compared to the combined four strand single bundle graft formed by combining the two smaller bundles.Introduction
Methods