Integrated Regional Orthopaedic (MSK) Assessment clinics (ROAC) are now mandated in many provinces for the assessment and triage of patients referred for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Their introduction underscores the lack of means for Primary Care Physicians (PCP) to appropriately refer patients for surgical consideration. Thus, problems arise when patients who are clear candidates for surgery are subject to a significant extra step in the care pathway by attending a ROAC while those who have insufficient problems are also seen, contributing to costs and crowding the access portal. We postulated that a patient reported outcome measure, decision aid combined with a validated grading of a weight bearing knee X-ray would provide an inexpensive yet effective tool to significantly improve the referral process for Knee OA (compared with the current mechanism).

To date we have enrolled two hundred and forty-five consenting patients to the study, all referred by their PCP to the ROAC with a diagnosis of symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis. All patients were evaluated as per the current ROAC protocol which included a medical history, physical examination and an X-ray (standing AP, lateral and patella-femoral skyline). Prior to the visit, subjects were sent a copy of a patient decision aid, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and requested to answer whether their current clinical status described as Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS2) was acceptable. All radiographs were analyzed and scored for OA severity using the validated grading from 0 – 13.

Of the 245 cases, 200 completed OKS and PASS2 uestionnaires and had standing X-rays for evaluation (only 120 completed the decision aid and these were left out of this report). Of the 200 included cases, 104 were referred from the ROAC to see a surgeon. In analysis, we found that a self-reported PASS 2 answer NO and an AP X-ray graded at 6 or above predicted over 75% of those patients that were referred. This represents a 3.4 greater likelihood of referral using this simple analysis. The OKS did not modify this prediction.

Thus, use of a validated grading of a standing AP X-ray along with a response, ‘readiness for surgery’ indicated 75% of patients appropriate for surgical consideration. Patients with less severe gradings are likely being unnecessarily referred to ROAC leading to overuse of scarce resources, crowding the access and adding to costs, others, who score higher, are being needlessly delayed. The ability to discreetly screen for the best possible candidates should be a continued focus of ROAC and will lead to improved use of expensive resources, overall patient care and satisfaction and the provision of tools to the PCP for appropriate referral.

This study determined the inter-reader and intra-reader reliability of lower limb frontal plane alignment measures obtained from digital radiographs using a computer software program.

Measurements of lower limb frontal plane alignment were obtained from over 3000 full limb digital radiographs of both limbs of persons ‘at risk’ for developing knee osteoarthritis (OA), as part of the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST). Three trained clinicians used a computer software program (Horizon Image Viewer, version 1.5, OAISYS Medical Inc.) to locate bone landmarks on the femur and tibia from which standard measures of alignment (e.g. the Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle) and bone lengths could be computed.

To assess the reliability of these alignment measurements, one hundred randomly assigned digital radiographs, representing two hundred limbs, were selected from the complete data set for a repeated analysis carried out two or more weeks after completion of the first measurements. Random effects two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) models were applied to estimate the interclass and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), which correspondingly evaluated inter-reader and intra-reader reliability for each of the angles and bone lengths.

High reliability measures were obtained for the HKA angle (inter-reader reliability: ICC=0.995 (95% CI, 0.994–1); intra-reader reliability: ICC= 0.998 (95% CI, 0.998–1)). Reliability for additional angles between the femur and tibia ranged from 0.839 to 0.993 (inter-reader reliability) and 0.908 to 0.998 (intra-reader reliability). High reliability measures were also obtained for bone lengths (inter-reader reliability: ICC from 0.993 to 0.995; intra-reader reliability: ICC from 0.994 to 0.995).

Each of the lower limb alignment and bone length measurements were highly reliable. The outcome supports the use of computer software programs and software tools for analysis of lower limb frontal plane alignment.