Backpain is a common cause of patient referral to pain clinics. Around 120 000 patients with back pain are seen in UK Pain Clinics every year. Facet joint injections are a commonly used treatment modality. However there is considerable controversy regarding their efficacy. Most of the evidence supporting the use of injections is anecdotal, rather than being based on randomised studies.

We carried out a prospective study to assess the efficacy of facet joint injections in relieving chronic low back pain. Our study group comprised 41 patients (57% females, 43% males). Patients completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and marked their pain levels on a Visual Analogue Scale (1 to 10).

We found that though the pain score improved from 6.9 to 4.3, there was only a marginal improvement in the ODI from 52.5 to 50.8. Overall 85 % of patients experienced some improvement, while 15% felt their symptoms had worsened after the injections. One of the most significant findings of this study was the fact that the improvement in most patients lasted only for an average of three weeks. This is significantly less than most previous studies indicate. Interestingly, inspite of this limited improvement, almost all patients expressed the desire to be placed back on the list for repeat injections.

Our study demonstrated a beneficial short term effect of facet joint injections. In our opinion, they are a reasonable adjunct to non operative treatment of chronic backpain.

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) continues to cause a significant burden of disease in the United Kingdom (UK). A total of 8113 cases were diagnosed in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in 2005, demonstrating a 28% increase since 2000. The incidence of TB in London is four times greater than the national average, with 43% of cases of TB in 2005 being identified in the capital (n= 3,479). 47% of TB cases in the UK have extra pulmonary involvement and 2–3% of all cases of TB involve the spine (n= 107)

Methods: We reviewed 109 patients treated for spinal TB in East London, UK, between 1997–2006. 59 were male and 50 were female. Their mean age was 39 (range 4–89). 63 patients were Asian (3 UK born), 30 African, 8 UK born Caucasian, 4 Caribbean (1 UK born), 3 patients from Eastern Europe and 1 from the Middle East. Of those patients born outside the UK, the mean time they had been in the country pre diagnosis was 9.6 years (range 0–50 years). They were followed up for a minimum of 1 year post completion of treatment (range 14 to 48 months).

95% of patients presented with back pain, with or without neurological compromise.

All patients were imaged with MRI or CT. 90 (86%) patients had microbiological and/or histological confirmation of TB. The majority of patients (52%) had two vertebral levels affected. The Thorocolumbar junction was the area most commonly affected. 4% of patients had paravertebral abscesses with no bony involvement seen on imaging. 29 patients (26%) had associated psoas abscess.

Combination chemotherapy, according to NICE guidelines, was the main modality of treatment. 67 (61%) patients were managed with combination chemotherapy alone. Surgery was performed for certain indications: deteriorating neurology, instability and post tubercular kyphosis. 42(39%) of patients required surgery.

Results: There were no deaths related to TB or our intervention. Most patients had a full neurological recovery but 21 patients (19%) suffered permanent neurological deficit. (4%) suffered permanent paraplegia or paraparesis severe enough to prevent walking.(out of this anybody had surgery and if so how delayed was that) There was a high incidence of persistent chronic back pain (62%) in our group of patients and was not related to any deformity.

Conclusion: Medical management is the mainstay of treatment for spinal TB, but there are certain instances where surgical intervention will be required.

Because of the high incidence of spinal TB in East London and in order to standardise treatment of these patients we set up dedicated multidisciplinary spinal TB clinic and are managed jointly by respiratory and orthopaedic teams.

Background: Tuberculosis continues to increase in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The London region accounted for a substantial proportion of cases in 2005 (43%) and had the highest rate of disease (46.3 per 100,000). Skeleton is a common site of predilection. However, diagnostic evaluation of vertebral TB is hampered by the difficulty of MRI interpretation and failing to keep a high index of suspicion.

Methods: Cross sectional sampling of all patients with confirmed vertebral TB between the years of 1999–2006 in two large London hospitals covering; Royal London Hospital and King George Hospital. Various dermographic parameters were evaluated. The mode of presentation, surgical procedures and outcome of patients were highlighted.

Results: One hundred and twenty three patients were identified with a Mean age of thirty four years. Male and female was 55%, 45% respectively. Asians represent the highest immigrant group followed by Afrocarbian at 63%, 28% respectively. White British represents only 6.5%. The dorsal spine was the most commonly affected site at 45%, then lumbar spine in 33% followed by multiple regions in 11%. Delayed diagnosis was made in 34% of patients, 44% of them over six months.

Back pain/neck pain was the presenting complaint in 100% whereas neurological signs were found in 37% and systemic manifestations present in 38%. To control the disease, spinal surgical procedures was needed in 44% of cases. Approximately 30% of them had partial recovery and 9% had complete recovery.

Conclusions: The incidence of vertebral TB is on the increase. A high index of suspecion is required to avoid delay in the diagnosis. Knowledge of the patients’ background may help making approperiate early referral for MRI especially among Asian groups.

Tuberculosis continues to increase in England. London accounted for a substantial proportion of cases in 2005 (43%) and had the highest rate of disease. Spinal TB is the most common skeletal manifestation. The diagnostic evaluation of spinal TB is hampered by the difficulty of MRI interpretation and failing to keep a high index of suspicion.

The mode of presentation of spinal tuberclosis, surgical procedures and outcome of patients were highlighted. Various dermographic parameters were evaluated.

A prospective cohort study was conducted. Cross sectional sampling of patients presented with spinal TB between the years of 1999–2006 in two main hospitals covering large population of East London, Royal London Hospital and King George Hospital.

One hundred and twenty three patients (mean age: 34 years) were identified. Asians represent the highest group affected (63%), then appear Afrocarribean (28%). White British represent only 6.5%. Frequency of occurence was as follows: dorsal spine 45%, lumbar spine 33%, multiple regions 11%. Delayed diagnosis was made in 34% of patients, 44% of whom were over 6/12.

Backpain or neckpain was the presenting complaint in all of the patients (100%), whereas neurological signs were found in 37%. Systemic manifestations presented in 38%. Spinal surgical procedures were needed in 44% of cases. Approximately 30% of them had partial recovery and 9% had complete recovery.

The incidence of spinal TB is on the increase. A high index of suspecion is required to avoid delay in the diagnosis. Knowledge of the patients’ background may help making appropriate early referral for MRI.

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) continues to cause a sig-nificant burden of disease in the United Kingdom (UK). The incidence of TB in London is four times greater than the national average, with almost half of the 7000 cases/year seen nationwide being found in the capital. Although the majority of cases are pulmonary, extra-pulmonary infection is not uncommon.

Methods: We reviewed 107 patients treated for spinal TB in East London, UK, between 1997–2006. 59 were male and 48 were female. Their mean age was 39.9 (6–89). 69 patients were Asian, 26 African, 10 UK-born Caucasian, 1 other European and 1 Middle Eastern. Rates of HIV co-infection are inexact as many declined to be tested.

All patients presented with symptomatic back pain, with or without neurological compromise.

All patients had appropriate pre and post treatment imaging. 100 had microbiological and/or histological confirmation of TB. The disease was predominantly in the thoraco-lumbar spine, although cervical involvement was seen in 5%. All patients presented with anterior column involvement, with psoas abscesses in 30%.

Combination chemotherapy, according to British Thoracic Society guidelines, was the main modality of treatment. Surgery was performed for certain indications: deteriorating neurology, instability and post tubercular kyphosis. 15% of the 107 patients treated required surgical intervention.

Results: There were no deaths related to TB or our intervention. Most patients had full neurological recovery, but a small percent had permanent neurological compromise. There was a high incidence of persistent chronic back pain for which patients continued to seek medical advice.

Conclusion: Medical management is the mainstay of treatment for spinal TB, but there are certain circumstances where surgical intervention will be required. Because of the high incidence of spinal TB in East London and in order to standardise treatment of these patients, 2 years ago we set up what we believe to be the only dedicated multidisciplinary spinal TB clinic in the UK. Patients are managed jointly by the respiratory and orthopaedic teams.