Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 7 - 7
1 Jan 2012
van de Water A Eadie J Hurley D
Full Access

Background and purpose

Sleep disturbance is frequently reported by people with chronic low back pain (CLBP >12 weeks), but there is limited knowledge of their sleep quality compared to healthy people. While disturbed sleep influences patients' mood, quality of life and recovery, few studies have comprehensively investigated sleep in CLBP. This study investigated differences in sleep profiles of people with CLBP, compared to age- and gender matched controls over seven consecutive nights.

Methods

Thirty-two consenting subjects (n=16 with CLBP, n=16 matched controls), aged 24-65 years (43.8% male) underwent an interview regarding sleep influencing variables (e.g. mattress firmness, caffeine consumption), completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Diary, SF36-v2, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and CLBP measures (i.e. Oswestry Disability Index and Numerical Pain Scales), recorded seven consecutive nights of sleep in their home using actigraphy, and completed a Devices Utility Questionnaire.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 8 - 8
1 Jan 2012
Hurley D Eadie J Tully M van Mechelen W Boreham C McDonough S Lonsdale C Daly L
Full Access

Background and purpose

Sleep disturbance is a prevalent symptom in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP >12 weeks), but there is currently no knowledge of the effectiveness of physiotherapy for this problem. This study evaluated the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) exploring the effects of physiotherapy on sleep disturbance in CLBP [Current controlled trial ISRCTN 54009836].

Methods

A sample of 60 consenting patients with CLBP [23 M, 37 F; mean (SD) age = 44.93 (13.41) years] were recruited in Beaumont Hospital, Dublin and randomly allocated to one of three groups [supervised exercise class (SEC), walking programme (WP) and usual physiotherapy (UP)] in a concealed manner. The main outcomes were sleep quality, functional disability, pain, and quality of life at baseline, 3 and 6 months.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 234 - 234
1 Mar 2010
Eadie J Breen R O’Donoghue G O’Connell DP
Full Access

Background: European guidelines recommend supervised group exercise for treating large groups of non specific low back pain patients. The class was established in Beaumont Hospital in 2006 and consists of an eight week supervised exercise programme and workshops in management of chronic low back pain using a bio psychosocial model. The purpose of this six month audit was to assess the outcomes of patients who attended a ‘Back to Fitness’ programme two years after it was set up.

Methods: Data was analysed using Data Desk ©. Demographic details were detailed for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and number of classes attended. Pre- class and post class comparisons were made using the Wilcoxin signed-ranks test for the SF- 36, Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire (ODI), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain scores.

Results: Twenty one patients (17 female and 4 male) started the programme, mean age was 49 years (SD= 9.6) and mean BMI was 31.6 kg/m2. The average class attendance was five and 62% completed the programme. Significant improvements were reported in SF 36 (p< 0.0001), ODI (p=0.0078) and pain intensity (p=0.03). The FABQ showed an improvement post class (pre-class mean= 17.89, SD= 3.55, post class mean= 12.57, SD= 6.78 (p=0.27)).

Conclusion: The Back to Fitness class continues to be an effective treatment in the management of chronic low back pain. Analysis of the FABQ in a larger sample may show significant changes post intervention.