The Birmingham hip resurfacing (Smith & Nephew, Tennessee) (BHR) has been used in younger more active patients. We report on our experience of 206 BHR procedures in patients aged 50 years or less with a minimum ten year follow-up. Clinical outcome scores, body mass index (BMI), gender and age were analysed to investigate resurfacing outcomes. 200 patients (158 males and 42 females) with an average operation age of 43.33 years (SD ±5.66) were investigated. There were 6 bilateral procedures The mean follow-up period was 12.44 years (SD ±1.71). The arthroplasties were completed between April 1999 and December 2002 by one surgeon. Data and outcome measurements were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively. We evaluated Harris Hip Scores, Short Form-36 (SF-36v2) Scores, Tegner Activity Score Scores and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Scores (WOMAC) comparatively at preoperative, six month and yearly intervals.Aim
Methods
Adverse tissue reactions have been a concern in relation to metal components, particularly in hip replacements. We look at a possible correlation between hip joint effusion and metal ion levels. 56 patients,(42M, 14F) agreed to the study. All had metal-on-mental arthroplasties. Average age was 64.2 (SD 9.8). All patients were asymptomatic. Ultrasound examination performed by one ultrasonographer, using a Sonosite M-Turbo machine with a C60X/5-2 MHz transducer. Cobalt levels were assessed using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. Chromium levels were assessed using a graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometer.Aim
Materials and methods
There has recently been an increase in the number of hip replacement procedures performed through an anterior approach. Every procedure has a risk profile, and in the case of a new procedure or technique it is important to investigate the incidence of complications. The aim of this study is to identify the complications encountered in the first 100 patients treated with the minimally invasive anterior approach. This is a case series of the first 100 hips treated and were assessed for complications. These were classified according to the severity and outcome [1]. The 100 hip comprised of 98 patients; 46 males and 52 females with an average operation age on 70.1 (±9.38) years. There were 2 bilateral procedures. Specific patient selection criteria were used. All complications occurred within one month of surgery. Complications such as fracture, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), cup malposition, femoral stem malposition, retained screw, excessive acetabular reaming and skin numbness were noted. Complications associated with fracture were characterized as either periprosthetic or trochanteric. Clinical outcome scores of SF36v2, WOMAC, Harris Hip and Tegner activity score were analysed at pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months 24 months and 36 months intervals. A total of 13 early complications occurred. Of these 13 complications the most common complications were trochanteric fracture, 3 instances (3.00%), periprosthetic fracture, 2 (2.00%), DVT, 2 (2.00%), numbness, 2 (2.00%) and loosening. Other complications recorded were cup malposition, 1 (1.00%), femoral stem malpositon, 1 (1.00%), retained screw, 1 (1.00%) and excessive acetabular reaming, 1 (1.00%). All fractures occurred in patients over the age of 60 years. Significant differences (p<0.05) were observed between all clinical outcomes measures pre-operatively and postoperatively (6, 12, 24 and 36 months). The unfamiliarity of the approach, however, increased operating time, and exposure problems, lead to trochanteric fracture.
Dissatisfaction with the posterior approach to total hip replacement has led to the anterior approach being adopted with enthusiasm in some areas. We aim to assess any difference between the 2 approaches and if so, the magnitude of this difference.Introduction
Objectives
