Patients (2.7M in EU) with positive cancer prognosis frequently develop metastases (≈1M) in their remaining lifetime. In 30-70% cases, metastases affect the spine, reducing the strength of the affected vertebrae. Fractures occur in ≈30% patients. Clinicians must choose between leaving the patient exposed to a high fracture risk (with dramatic consequences) and operating to stabilise the spine (exposing patients to unnecessary surgeries). Currently, surgeons rely on their sole experience. This often results in to under- or over-treatment. The standard-of-care are scoring systems (e.g. Spine Instability Neoplastic Score) based on medical images, with little consideration of the spine biomechanics, and of the structure of the vertebrae involved. Such scoring systems fail to provide clear indications in ≈60% patients. The HEU-funded METASTRA project is implemented by biomechanicians, modellers, clinicians, experts in verification, validation, uncertainty quantification and certification from 15 partners across Europe. METASTRA aims to improve the stratification of patients with vertebral metastases evaluating their risk of fracture by developing dedicated reliable computational models based on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (AI) and on personalised Physiology-based biomechanical (VPH) models.Introduction
Method
Vertebroplasty, which is the percutaneous injection of bone cement into vertebral bodies has recently been used to treat painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Early clinical results have been encouraging, but very little is known about the consequences of augmentation with cement for the adjacent, non-augmented level. We therefore measured the overall failure, strength and structural stiffness of paired osteoporotic two-vertebra functional spine units (FSUs). One FSU of each pair was augmented with polymethyl-methacrylate bone cement in the caudal vertebra, while the other served as an untreated control. Compared with the controls, the ultimate failure load for FSUs treated by injection of cement was lower. The geometric mean treated/untreated ratio of failure load was 0.81, with 95% confidence limits from 0.70 to 0.92, (p <
0.01). There was no significant difference in overall FSU stiffness. For treated FSUs, there was a trend towards lower failure loads with increased filling with cement (r2 = 0.262, p = 0.13). The current practice of maximum filling with cement to restore the stiffness and strength of a vertebral body may provoke fractures in adjacent, non-augmented vertebrae. Further investigation is required to determine an optimal protocol for augmentation.
