Introduction

Acromial and scapular fractures are a rare but difficult complication with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), with an incidence rate reported from 1–10%. The risk factors associated with these fractures types is largely unknown. The goal of this study is to analyze the clinical outcomes, demographic and comorbidity data, and implant sizing and surgical technique information from 4125 patients who received a primary rTSA with one specific prosthesis (Equinoxe, Exactech, Inc) and were sorted based on the radiographic documentation of an acromial and/or scapula fracture (ASF) to identify factors associated with this complication.

Rivaroxaban is a novel, oral, once-daily, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development. RECORD1 was a multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III study investigating the efficacy and safety of extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin following THR.

Patients (N=4541) were randomized to receive oral rivaroxaban 10 mg (6–8 hours after surgery and once daily thereafter) or subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg (administered the evening before surgery, 6–8 hours after surgery, and once daily thereafter) for 35±4 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep vein thrombosis (DVT: symptomatic or detected by mandatory, bilateral venography if asymptomatic), non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause mortality up to day 36±6. Major venous thromboembolism (VTE), the composite of any DVT, non-fatal PE and VTE-related death, was a secondary outcome. Safety endpoints included major and non-major bleeding while receiving study medication.

Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the incidence of the primary efficacy outcome compared with enoxaparin (1.1% vs 3.7%, respectively; p< 0.001; relative risk reduction [RRR] 70%). Rivaroxaban also significantly reduced the incidence of major VTE compared with enoxaparin (0.2% vs 2.0%, respectively; p< 0.001; RRR 88%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding (0.3% vs 0.1%; p=0.178) or non-major bleeding (5.8% vs 5.8%; p=1.000) between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin, respectively. There was no evidence of liver safety issues associated with rivaroxaban.

Thromboprophylaxis with once-daily, oral rivaroxaban was significantly more effective than subcutaneous enoxaparin following THR without an increased risk of bleeding. This trial demonstrates the efficacy and safety of a fixed, unmonitored, once-daily dose of oral rivaroxaban for extended thromboprophylaxis after THR.

Dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa^®) is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor that was recently approved in Europe and Canada for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. In the phase III studies, concomitant administration of selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs with t½≤12 hours) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; < 160 mg/day) was allowed during treatment with dabigatran etexilate or enoxaparin. Due to the potential additional anticoagulant activity of these concomitant therapies a separate post hoc analysis was conducted to investigate the bleeding risk in these patients. We analysed the pooled study population (8,135 patients) from the three phase III trials in THA and TKA surgery (RE-MOBILIZE, RE-MODEL and RE-NOVATE) for major bleeding events (MBE). All MBE, which included surgical site bleeds, were assessed by an independent, expert adjudication committee. We report the rates of MBE and odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for comparison of the subgroup concomitantly treated with NSAID (or ASA) versus the subgroup of patients without concomitant antithrombotically active medication. The overall rate of MBE (with and without NSAIDs and ASA) was 1.4% [CI 1.0–1.9], 1.1% [0.7–1.5] and 1.4% [1.0–2.0] with dabigatran etexilate 220 mg, 150 mg, and enoxaparin, respectively. Of the total population, 57.4% of patients received concomitant antithrombotic treatment: 54.1% received NSAID and 4.7% received ASA. The MBE rate in patients receiving dabigatran etexilate or enoxaparin plus NSAIDs was similar to the rate in patients taking only dabigatran etexilate or enoxaparin; 1.5% vs. 1.4% [OR 1.05; 0.55–2.01] for dabigatran etexilate 220 mg, 1.1% vs. 1.0% [OR 1.19; 0.55–2.55] for dabigatran etexilate 150 mg, and 1.6% vs. 1.2% [OR 1.32; 0.67–2.57] for enoxaparin. A similar pattern was seen in patients concomitantly receiving ASA; in this small group only a few patients with MBE were observed: 2 (1.6%) in the dabigatran etexilate 220 mg group, 2 (1.6%) in the 150 mg group, and 4 (3.0%) in the enoxaparin group. No relevant differences in risk for MBE were detected between treatments by co-medication subgroup or within treatment groups when comparing patients receiving dabigatran etexilate or enoxaparin only versus those concomitantly receiving NSAIDs or ASA. In conclusion, patients concomitantly receiving dabigatran etexilate and NSAIDs (with t½ ≤12 hours) or ASA (< 160 mg/day) have a similar risk of MBE to patients taking only dabigatran etexilate. These data support the use of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of VTE in patients after THA or TKA, when concomitant use of NSAIDs or ASA (< 160 mg/day) is required.

Rivaroxaban is a novel, oral, once-daily, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced development for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study analysed the potential economic benefit attributable to the use of oral rivaroxaban relative to subcutaneous enoxaparin for extended VTE prophylaxis (35±4 days) after total hip replacement (THR). In RECORD1, rivaroxaban reduced the incidence of the composite primary efficacy endpoint (total VTE, including all-cause mortality) by 70%, compared with enoxaparin (p< 0.001). Symptomatic VTE occurred in 0.3% and 0.5% (p=0.22) of patients receiving rivaroxaban and enoxaparin, respectively. Major bleeding was low and similar in both groups: 0.3% and 0.1% (p=0.18), respectively.

Potential savings associated with oral rivaroxaban were based on any reduction in the incidence of symptomatic VTE events, and reduced administration and monitoring costs. Analyses for both the US and the UK included only non-drug costs incurred by the healthcare sector. It was assumed that nurses spent 3 minutes/day administering enoxaparin and training patients to self-inject; assumed duration of hospital stay was 5 days. UK costs (based on the 2007 NICE Guidelines) also included full blood counts (FBCs) every 3 days, for up to 14 days, in patients receiving enoxaparin.

Two analyses were performed: one assumed no difference in the occurrence of symptomatic VTE between treatments; the other assumed that the observed difference was real, but did not reach statistical significance.

In the first analysis, assuming no difference in symptomatic VTE incidence, the total resource cost in the US was $46/patient for enoxaparin and $42.5/patient for rivaroxaban: a saving of $3.5/patient. For the UK, the total resource cost was £33/patient for enoxaparin and £7.5/per patient for rivaroxaban: a saving of £25.5/ patient. Savings were driven by reduced monitoring (FBCs) and administration costs.

In the second analysis, assuming the observed difference in symptomatic VTE incidence was real, the US total resource cost was $57/patient for enoxaparin and $42.5/patient for rivaroxaban: a saving of $14.5/patient. For the UK, the total resource cost was £30/patients for enoxaparin and £7.5/patient for rivaroxaban: a saving of £22.5/patient. Savings were again driven by reduced monitoring and administration costs, and also reduced VTE incidence.

Over 400,000 US patients undergo THR, and ~60,000 patients in England and Wales undergo THR annually. Thus, the potential cumulative cost savings with rivaroxaban are considerable.

Introduction: After total hip replacement (THR), thromboprophylaxis for at least 10 days and for up to 35 days is recommended – yet a convenient, oral anticoagulant is not currently available. Rivaroxaban – a once-daily, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor with a predictable clinical profile – is in advanced clinical development. RECORD1, a multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III study, compared once-daily oral rivaroxaban with subcutaneous enoxaparin for 5 weeks following THR.

Methods: In total, 4541 patients were randomized to receive oral rivaroxaban 10 mg (6–8 hours after surgery and once daily thereafter), or 40 mg enoxaparin (administered subcutaneously the evening before surgery, resumed 6–8 hours after surgery, and continued once daily). Thromboprophylaxis was administered for 35±4 days; mandatory, bilateral venography was conducted the next day. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of any deep vein thrombosis (DVT), nonfatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause mortality. Safety endpoints included major and non-major bleeding during the active treatment period.

Results: The incidence of the composite of DVT, PE, and all-cause mortality was significantly lower for rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin (1.1% vs 3.7%, respectively; p< 0.001; relative risk reduction [RRR] 70%). The incidence of major VTE was also significantly lower for rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin (0.2% vs 2.0%, respectively; p< 0.001; RRR 88%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding (0.3% vs 0.1%; p=0.178) or non-major bleeding (5.8% vs 5.8%; p=1.000) between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin, respectively. There was no evidence of cardiac or liver safety issues.

Conclusions: Following THR, thromboprophylaxis with once-daily, oral rivaroxaban was shown to be significantly more effective than subcutaneous, once-daily enoxaparin – without an increased risk of bleeding. This trial demonstrates the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban using a fixed, unmonitored, once-daily dose for extended thromboprophylaxis after THR.

Purpose: Ceramic/ceramic bearing surfaces have the advantage of significantly decreased wear and high biocompatibility compared to CoCr/PE or ceramic/PE. The purpose of this randomized, controlled, multi-center, prospective study was to evaluate the clinical and roentgenographic results of 469 ceramic/ceramic versus 321 ceramic/PE THA at a 2 to 7 year follow-up.

Methods: The ceramic/ceramic THA had a polished alumina femoral head articulating with a polished alumina acetabular liner seated into the metal acetabular shell designed to avoid any impingement of the ceramic liner on the femoral component. Evaluations were completed preoperatively, at 6 months and yearly postoperatively.

Results: Mean age of the 790 patients was 59 years, with slightly more females. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. The main diagnoses were OA in 74% and osteonecrosis in 19%. Preoperatively the mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) and WOMAC scores were 44 and 41, respectively, and did not differ significantly between the two groups. At follow-up, the mean HHS was 93 for the ceramic/ ceramic THA and 93 for the ceramic/PE THA. The mean WOMAC scores showed no differences at follow-up. Roentgenographic analysis revealed one acetabular cup migration with a PE liner. One ceramic liner fractured upon insertion that was not properly positioned prior to impaction. Otherwise, there were no revisions or complications related to either bearing surface.

Conclusions: This short-term study has demonstrated efficacy and safety of a ceramic/ceramic bearing surface compared to the standard ceramic/PE surface currently used in clinical practice, with no failures or complications related to the bearing surface. Further follow-up is indicated to determine the long-term outcome.

Funding : Commerical funding

Funding Parties : Encore Orthopaedics

We reviewed retrospectively 25 hip arthroplasties in 25 patients with sickle-cell haemoglobinopathy and osteonecrosis. The mean age of the ten women and 15 men at the onset of hip symptoms was 25 years, and at surgery 30 years (16 to 45); 66% had either SS or S-thal disease, 20% sickle-cell trait, and the remainder SC disease. The mean follow-up was 8.6 years (two to 18). Fourteen (40%) of the arthroplasties had been revised at a mean of 7.5 years after the primary procedure and nine other hips were either radiographically and/or symptomatically loose. The overall complication rate was 49% and the infection rate 20%. The risk-to-benefit ratio of hip arthroplasty in sickle-cell haemoglobinopathy is high.