Displaced fractures of the lateral condyle of the humerus are
frequently managed surgically with the aim of avoiding nonunion,
malunion, disturbances of growth and later arthritis. The ideal
method of fixation is however not known, and treatment varies between
surgeons and hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare the
outcome of two well-established forms of surgical treatment, Kirschner
wire (K-wire) and screw fixation. A retrospective cohort study of children who underwent surgical
treatment for a fracture of the lateral condyle of the humerus between
January 2005 and December 2014 at two centres was undertaken. Pre,
intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were evaluated. A total of 336 children were included in the study. Their mean
age at the time of injury was 5.8 years (0 to 15) with a male:female
patient ratio of 3:2. A total of 243 (72%) had a Milch II fracture
and the fracture was displaced by > 2 mm in 228 (68%). In all, 235
patients underwent K-wire fixation and 101 had screw fixation. Aims
Patients and Methods
The biological properties of morselised bone allograft treated with either a supercritical fluid process or low-dose (15 kGy) gamma irradiation were compared using radiological, histological and immunohistological techniques. The aims were to investigate any differences in the biological properties of supercritical fluid treated allograft and low-dose gamma irradiated allograft in-vivo. Rabbit allograft were cleaned of all soft tissue, cartilage and processed into ‘corticancellous crunch’ using a Noviomagus Bone Mill. Pooled samples were either gamma irradiated (15 kGy) or treated by NovaSterilis using super critical carbon dioxide. A well-reported tibial defect model in ten rabbits was used to examine the in vivo response of the different treatments at two and four weeks following surgery (n=5 per time point). Radiographic (x-ray, CT and micro CT), histology and immunohistochemistry was used to assess the in vivo response. Radiographic results revealed an initial response to the gamma-irradiated samples compared to SCF. Histology confirmed this reaction to be inflammatory in nature at two weeks that continued at four weeks for the gamma irradiated samples. In contrast, the SCF treated sample demonstrated new bone formation while the inflammatory reaction was muted compared to the gamma irradiated samples. Four week x-rays and histology confirmed new bone formation in both groups while the lack of significant inflammatory response in the SCF group was noted. Allograft sterilisation techniques do not result in the same initial response when evaluated in vivo. Removal of lipids and cellular debris following SCF treatment may influence the in vivo response. While both techniques can provide a sterile product, the in vivo response requires further investigation.
