Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) and Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) have been reported to increase accuracy and predictability of tumour resections. The technically demanding joint-preserving surgery that retains the native joint with the better function may benefit from the new techniques. This cadaver study is to investigate the surgical accuracy of CAS and PSI in joint-preserving surgery of knee joint.

CT scans of four cadavers were performed and imported into an engineering software (MIMICS, Materialise) for the 3D surgical planning of simulated, multiplanar joint-preserving resections for distal femur or proximal tibia metaphyseal bone sarcoma. The planned resections were transferred to the navigation system (OrthoMap 3D, Stryker) for navigation planning and used for the design and fabrication of the PSI. Each of the four techniques (freehand, CAS, PSI and CAS + PSI) was used in four joint-preserving resections. Location accuracy (the maximum deviation of distance between the planned and the achieved resections) and bone resection time were measured. The results were compared by using t-test (statistically significant if P< 0.05).

Both the CAS+PSI and PSI techniques could reproduce the planned resections with a mean location accuracy of < 2 mm, compared to 3.6 mm for CAS assistance and 9.2 mm for the freehand technique. There was no statistical difference in location accuracy between the CAS+PSI and the PSI techniques (p=0.92) but a significant difference between the CAS technique and the CAS+PSI (p=0.042) or PSI technique (p=0.034) and the freehand technique with the other assisted techniques. The PSI technique took the lowest mean time of 4.78 ±0.97min for bone resections. This was significantly different from the CAS+PSI technique (mean 12.78 min; p < 0.001) and the CAS technique (mean 16.97 min; p = < 0.001).

CAS and PSI assisted techniques help reproduce the planned multiplanar resections. The PSI technique could achieve the most accurate bone resections (within 2mm error) with the least time for bone resections. Combining CAS with PSI might not improve surgical accuracy and might increase bone resection time. However, PSI placement on the bone surface depends only on the subjective feeling of surgeons and may not apply if the extraosseous tumor component is large. Combining CAS with PSI could address the limitations.

Most types of bone tumor surgery require intra-operative imaging or measurement to control margins and prevent unnecessary bone loss. Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) has been used as a replacement of fluoroscopy or direct measurement tools in four specific types of oncological orthopaedic surgical approaches. There are intralesional treatments, image-based resections, image-based resections with image-based reconstructions and image-based resections with imageless tumor prostheses reconstruction. Since 2006 we have performed 130 oncological surgeries with CAS.

Most cases were excochleations, 64, where CAS replaces fluoroscopy as an intra-operative imaging modality. Advantages over fluoroscopy are real time three dimensional feedback, high-res image and no use of ionizing radiation. It is especially useful in larger lesions or lesions located in the femoral head or pelvis. Currently a study is being performed on patient satisfaction, recurrence and complications.

Another application where CAS has often been used is in resections and segmental resections (together 45). These can be preplanned before surgery, incorporating the margin required, and checked intra-operatively. Coloration of the tumor, critical structures is useful to avoid these. Sometimes it's possible with careful planning to spare structures that otherwise probably would not confidently have spared.

With hemicortical resection (5) it's possible to use CAS to exactly copy the shape of the resected bone to an allograft. A Ct scan of one case shows an average gap between host and graft of 0.9 mm (range 0–5.4) along the 6 cm resection.

Finally in 16 cases of imageless use in placement of tumor prostheses it feels greatly helpful in reconstructing the joint line, length and correct rotation.

There were 8 failures in these 130 cases with the system or software. Setup time was measured in 47 cases and was on average 6:50 (range 2:26–14:27). Indication and performance of CAS in orthopedic oncology is an under researched aspect of CAS. In our opinion CAS shows great promise in the field of orthopedic oncology and is a valuable tool in the operating room.

Adamantinoma are rare, low grade malignant, bone tumors, making up only 0.1–0.48 percent of primary malignant bone tumors. They occur predominantly in the long bones, especially the tibia. Histogenetically it is thought that it originates from embryological displacement of basal epithelium of the skin, although other hypotheses have been proposed. Clinically most patients present with swelling and possible bending of the tibia, painful or painless. It's often noticed in an earlier stadium, but symptoms are non-specific and have a slow progressive character. Median patient age is 25 to 35 years, with a range from two to 86 years. It is slightly more common in men than woman, with a ratio of 5:4. Occurrence in children is even rarer. A study by Van Rijn et al. finds only 119 references, and presents six more cases. Treatment is the same. An MRI-scan should be performed to check for metastasis, loco regional staging and for operative planning. Operative excision and reconstruction is necessary to prevent metastasis and maintain load bearing capacity.

Generally these resections and reconstructions are done without objective measurements. The surgeon uses a rule of thumb, like a sculptor, or ruler approach to recreate the excised bone, either with allo- or autograft materials. An optimal fit, i.e. a minimal space between tibia and graft, is not always achieved, possibly resulting in pathological fractures.

This risk of pathological fractures lengthens recovery time. The fractures elongate hospitalization time and recovery time and are a heavy burden to patients. Computer assisted surgery (CAS) systems, used for example in prosthesis placement, offer objective measurements in 3d space of hard structures with high accuracy. These can be used to produce an accurate copy of the resected bone. If the reconstruction accurately fits the bone defect that's left after the resection, it's likely that the occurrence of pathological fractures decreases.

An adamantinoma in the tibia of a 12 year old boy was treated. Surgery consisted of hemicortical resection and inlay allograft reconstruction. The software used was the Orthomap navigation software (Stryker). A donor bone was supplied with help from the bone bank. The technical approach to the reconstruction was the planning of resection planes around the tumor. As the CT scale for both the patient and allograft bone is the same, the resection planes in the patient navigation setup could be copied to the allograft creation setup. Normal CAS setup was performed after first incision, with a tracker attached to the tibia. It was planned that a navigated bone saw would be used for the cutting. The tracker was attached to the saw with a new attachment, and calibrated in the universal calibration tool. During the surgery the oscillating saw proved to be impossible to navigate. The instrument calibration module was not able to accurately registered the saw, this despite accurate registrations in pre-operative testing. The CAS system was used however for accurately determining the saw planes. The planes were traced with the pointer tool. Then a non-navigated saw was used to perform both trapezoid shaped resections. A similar CAS setup was performed on the donor bone.

The reconstruction was a good fit. The skin was closed in layers. Post-operative x-ray control was performed. Operation time was just over two hours. Currently the follow-up time is five months. There have been no complications and the control x-rays show good allograft ingrowth.

While the original operation plan couldn't be performed the principle of computer assisted reconstruction has its merits. This was a proof of concept. The navigation was accurate to less than 1 mm, and the trapezoid resection shape guarantees a good fit. However the method of resection of the drawn planes by non-navigated bone saw was not accurate enough, because of the saw oscillations. There was improvement in operation time. With more accurate means of resection, as for example a computer controlled laser or water-jet, this type of reconstruction could have other very interesting applications.