Uncemented porous coated acetabular components have gained more research emphasis in recent years compared to their cemented counterparts, largely owing to the natural biological fixation they offer. Nevertheless, sufficient peri-prosthetic bone ingrowth is essential for long-term fixation of such uncemented acetabular components. The phenomenon of bone ingrowth can be predicted based on mechanoregulatory principles of primary bone fracture healing. Literature review reveals that the surface texture of implant plays a major role in implant-bone fixation mechanism. A few The 3-D microscale model [Fig.1] of implant-bone interface was developed using CATIA® V5R20 software (DassaultSystèmes, France) and was modelled in ANSYS V15.0 FE software (Ansys Inc., PA, USA) using coupled linear elastic ten-noded tetrahedral finite elements. The model consists of cast-inbeaded mesh textured implant having finely meshed inter-bead spacing. Linear, elastic and isotropic material properties considering Young's modulus of 210 GPa and Poisson's ratio of 0.3 for stainless steel implant were employed in the model. Boundary of bone was assumed to be rich in Mesenchymal Stem Cells(MSC) with periodic boundary conditions at contralateral surfaces. The linear elastic material properties in the model were updated iteratively through a tissue differentiation algorithm that works on the principle of mechanotransduction driven by local mechanical stimuli, e.g. hydrostatic pressure and equivalent deviatoric strain.Introduction
Materials/Methods
Bone fracture toughness is an important parameter in resistance of bone to monotonic and fatigue failure. Earlier studies on bone fracture toughness were focused on either cortical or cancellous bone, separately [1, 2]. Reported fracture toughness values indicated that cortical bone is tougher to break as compared to cancellous bone. In order to understand complete fracture of a whole bone, the interface between cortical and cancellous bone (named as corticellous bone) might play a crucial role and is interesting topic of research. The goal of this study was to identify fracture toughness in terms of J integral and fracture mechanism of the corticellous bone. Corticellous bone samples (single edge notch bend specimen or SENB) were prepared from bovine proximal femur according to ASTM E399-90 standard (Fig.1). For corticellous bone, samples were prepared in such way that approximately half of the sample width consist of cortical bone and another half is cancellous bone. Precaution was taken while giving notch and pre-crack to corticellous bone that pre-crack should not enter from cortical to cancellous portion. All specimens were tested using a universal testing machine (Tinius Olsen, ± 100 N) under displacement rate of 100 µm/min until well beyond yield point. The fracture toughness parameter in terms of critical stress intensity (KIC) was calculated according to ASTM E399-90 as given by,
Where, P = applied load in kN, S = loading span in cm, B = specimen thickness in cm, W = specimen width in cm, a = total crack length, f(a/W) = geometric function. After the fracture test the J integral of each specimen was calculated using following equation. [ASTM E1820].
Where, Jel is J integral of the elastic deformation, Jpl is J integral of the plastic deformation, E′=E for plane stress condition and E′= E/(1−ν2) for plane strain condition (E is elastic modulus; ν is Poisson's ratio), bo = W−ao, height of the un-cracked ligament, and Apl is the area of the plastic deformation part in the load–displacement curve.Introduction
Material and Methods
Long-term success of the cementless acetabular component has been depends on amount of bone ingrowth around porous coated surface of the implant, which is mainly depends on primary stability, i.e. amount of micromotion at the implant-bone interface. The accurate positioning of the uncemented acetabular component and amount of interference fit (press-fit) at the rim of the acetabulum are necessary to reduce the implant-bone micromotion and that can be enhancing the bone ingrowth around the uncemented acetabular component. However, the effect of implant orientations and amount of press-fit on implant-bone micromotion around uncemented acetabular component has been relatively under investigated. The aim of the study is to identify the effect of acetabular component orientation on implant-bone relative micromotion around cementless metallic acetabular component. Three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the intact and implanted pelvises were developed using CT-scan data [1]. Five implanted pelvises model, having fixed antiversion angle (25°) and different acetabular inclination angle (30°, 35°, 40°, 45° and 50°), were generated in order to understand the effect of implant orientation on implant-bone micromotion around uncemented metallic acetabular component. The CoCrMo alloy was chosen for the implant material, having 54 mm outer diameter and 48 mm bearing diameter [1]. Heterogeneous cancellous bone material properties were assigned using CT-scan data and power law relationship [1], whereas, the cortical bone was assumed homogeneous and isotropic [1]. In the implanted pelvises models, 1 mm diametric press-fit was simulated between the rim of the implant and surrounding bone. Six nodded surface-to-surface contact elements with coefficient of friction of 0.5 were assigned at the remaining portion of the implant–bone interface [1]. Twenty-one muscle forces and hip-joint forces corresponds to peak hip-joint force of a normal walking cycle (13%) were used for the applied loading condition. Fixed constrained was prescribed at the sacroiliac joint and pubis-symphysis [1]. A submodelling technique was implemented, in order to get more accurate result around implant-bone interface [1].Introduction
Materials and Method
Despite the generally inferior clinical performance of acetabular prostheses as compared to the femoral implants, the causes of acetabular component loosening and the extent to which mechanical factors play a role in the failure mechanism are not clearly understood yet. The study was aimed at investigating the load transfer and bone remodelling around the uncemented acetabular prosthesis. The 3-D FE model of a natural right hemi-pelvis was developed using CT-scan data. The same bone was implanted with two uncemented hemispherical acetabular components, one metallic (CoCrMo alloy) and the other ceramic (Biolox delta), with 54 mm outer diameter and 48 mm bearing diameter. The FE models of the implanted pelvis (containing ∼116000 quadratic tetrahedrals) were generated using a submodelling approach, which were based on an overall full model of implanted pelvis (containing ∼217600 quadratic tetrahedrals) acted upon by hip joint force and twenty one muscle forces. The apparent density (ρ in g cm−3) of each cancellous bone element was calculated using linear calibration of CT numbers of bone, from which the Young's modulus (E in MPa) was determined using the relationship, E = 2017.3 ρ2.46 [1]. Implant-bone interface conditions, fully bonded and debonded with friction coefficient μ = 0.5, were simulated using contact elements. Applied loading conditions consist of two load cases during a gait cycle, corresponding to 13% and 52% of the walking cycle. Fixed constraints were prescribed at the pubis and at the sacroiliac joint. The bone remodelling algorithm was based on strain energy based site-specific formulation [2]. The FE analysis, in combination with the bone remodelling simulation, was performed using ANSYS FE software. The predicted changes in peri-prosthetic bone density were similar for the metallic and the ceramic implant. For debonded implant-bone interface, stress shielding led to ∼20% reductions in bone density at supero-anterior, infero-anterior and posterior part of the acetabulum (Fig. 1). However, bone apposition was observed at the supero-posterior part of the acetabulum, where implantation led to ∼60% increase in bone density (Fig. 1). The effect of bone resorption was higher for the fully bonded implant-bone interface, wherein bone density reductions of 20–50% were observed in the cancellous bone underlying the implant (Fig. 1), which is indicative of implant loosening over time. However, implantation led to an increase in bone density around the acetabular rim for both the interface conditions (Fig. 1). These results are well corroborated by the earlier studies [3, 4]. Implantation with a ceramic component resulted in 2–7% increase in bone density at supero-posterior part of the acetabulum as compared to the metallic component, for the debonded interface condition. Considering better wear resistant properties and absence of metal ion release, results of this study suggest that the ceramic component might be a viable alternative to the metallic prosthesis.
