The risk of AVN is high in Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) and the optimal surgical treatment remains controversial. Our AVN rates in severe, unstable SCFE remained unchanged following the introduction of the Modified Dunn Procedure (MDP) and as a result, our practice evolved towards performing an Anterior Open Reduction and Decompression (AOR) in an attempt to potentially reduce the “second hit” phenomenon that may contribute. The aim of this study was to determine the early surgical outcomes in Unstable SCFE following AOR compared to the MDP.

All moderate to severe, Loder unstable SCFEs between 2008 and 2022 undergoing either an AOR or MDP were included. AVN was defined as a non-viable post-operative SPECT-CT scan.

Eighteen patients who underwent AOR and 100 who underwent MPD were included. There was no significant difference in severity (mean PSA 64 vs 66 degrees, p = 0.641), or delay to surgery (p = 0.973) between each group. There was no significant difference in the AVN rate at 27.8% compared to 24% in the AOR and MDP groups respectively (p = 0.732). The mean operative time in the AOR group was 24 minutes less, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.084). The post-reduction PSA was 26 degrees (range, 13–39) in the AOR group and 9 degrees (range, -7 to 29) in the MDP group (p<0.001). Intra-operative femoral head monitoring had a lower positive predictive value in the AOR group (71% compared to 90%).

Preliminary results suggest the AVN rate is not significantly different following AOR. There is less of an associated learning curve with the AOR, but as anticipated, a less anatomical reduction was achieved in this group. We still feel that there is a role for the MDP in unstable slips with a larger remodelling component.

The treatment of joint-fractures is a common task in orthopaedic surgery causing considerable health costs and patient disabilities. Percutaneous techniques have been developed to mitigate the problems related to open surgery (e.g. soft tissue damage), although their application to joint-fractures is limited by the sub-optimal intra-operative imaging (2D- fluoroscopy) and by the high forces involved. Our earlier research toward improving percutaneous reduction of intra-articular fractures has resulted in the creation of a robotic system prototype, i.e. RAFS (Robot-Assisted Fracture Surgery) system.

We propose a robot-bone attachment device for percutaneous bone manipulation, which can be anchored to the bone fragment through one small incision, ensuring the required stability and reducing the “biological cost” of the procedure. It consists of a custom-designed orthopaedic pin, an anchoring system (AS secures the pin to the bone), and a gripping system (GS connects the pin and the robot). This configuration ensures that the force/torque applied by the robot is fully transferred to the bone fragment to achieve the desired anatomical reduction.

The device has been evaluated through the reduction of 9 distal femur fractures on human cadavers using the RAFS system. The devices allowed the reduction of 7 fractures with clinical acceptable accuracy. 2 fractures were not reduced: in one case the GS failed and was not able to keep the pin stationary inside the robot (pin rotates inside the GS). The other fracture was too dislocated (beyond the operational workspace capability of the robot). A more stable GS will be designed to avoid displacements between the pin and the robot.

Anatomic reduction (subcapital re-alignment osteotomy) via surgical hip dislocation – increasingly popular. While the reported AVN rates are very low, experiences seem to differ greatly between centres. We present our early experience with the first 29 primary cases and a modified fixation technique.

We modified the fixation from threaded Steinman pins to cannulated 6.5mm fully-threaded screws: retrograde guidewire placement before reduction of the head ensured an even spread in the femoral neck and head. The mean PSA (posterior slip angle) at presentation (between 12/2008 and 01/2011) was overall 68° (45–90°). 59% (17/29) were stable slips (mean PSA 68°), and 41% (12/29) were unstable slips unable to mobilise (mean PSA 67°). The vascularity of the femoral head was assessed postoperatively with a bone scan including tomography.

The slip angle was corrected to a mean PSA of 5.8° (7° anteversion to 25° PSA). We encountered no complications related to our modified fixation technique.

All cases with a well vascularised femoral head on the post-operative bone scan (15/17 stable slips and 8/12 unstable slips) healed with excellent short term results.

Both stable slips with decreased vascularity on bone scan (2/17, 12%) had been longstanding severe slips with retrospectively suspected partial closure of the physis, which has been described as a factor for increased risk of avascular necrosis (AVN). One of these cases was complicated by a posterior redislocation due to acetabular deficiency. In the unstable group, 4/12 cases (33%) had avascular heads intra-operatively and cold postoperative bone scans, 3 have progressed to AVN and collapse.

Anatomic reduction while sparing the blood supply of the femoral head is a promising concept with excellent short term results in most stable and many unstable SCFE cases. Extra vigilance for closed/closing physes in longstanding severe cases seems advisable. Regardless of treatment, some unstable cases inevitably go on to AVN.