Abstract

Several specimen specific vertebral (VB) models have been proposed in the literature; these replicate the typical set-up of a vertebral body mounted in bone cement and subject to a compressive ramp. VB and cement geometries are obtained from micro-CT images, the cement is typically assigned properties obtained from the literature while VB properties are inferred from the Hounsfield units- where the conversion factor between grayscale data and Young's modulus is optimised using experimental load-displacement data. Typically this calibration is performed on VBs dissected from the same spines as the study group. This, alongside the use of non-specific cement properties, casts some doubts on the predictivity of the models thus obtained. The predictivity of specimen specific FE models was evaluated in this study.

VBs obtained from three porcine cervical segments (C2-C6) were stripped of all soft tissues, potted in bone cement and subject to a compressive loading ramp. A speckle pattern was applied to the anterior part of the specimen for DIC imaging. Specimen specific FE models were constructed from these specimens and a conversion factor between grayscale and material properties was optimised. Cement properties were assigned based on literature data. VBs from a further cervical spine (C2-C7) were subject to the same experimental protocol. In this case, the models generated from microCT images the material properties of bone were assigned based on the average conversion factor obtained previously. The predicted load-displacement behaviour thus obtained was compared to experimental data. Generally, poor agreement was found between overall load-displacement. The use of generic cement properties in the models was found to be partly responsible for this. When the load displacement behaviour of the VB was studied in isolation, good agreement within one standard deviation was found with 4 out of 6 models showing good correlation between simulation and DIC data.

Digital image correlation (DIC) is rapidly increasing in popularity in biomechanical studies of the musculoskeletal system. DIC allows the re-construction of full field displacement and/or strain maps of the surface of an object. DIC systems typically consist of two cameras focussing on the same region of interest. This constrains the angle between the cameras to be relatively narrow when studying specimens characterised by complex geometrical features, giving rise to concerns on the accuracy of the out of plane estimates of movement.

The aim of this research was to compare the movement profiles of bony segments measured by DIC and by an optoelectronic motion capture system.

Five porcine cervical spine segments (C2-C6) were obtained from the local butcher. These were stripped of all anterior soft tissues while the posterior structures were left intact. A speckle pattern was applied to the anterior aspect of the specimens, while custom made infrared clusters were rigidly attached to the 3 middle vertebral bodies (C3-C5). The specimens were mounted in a custom made impact rig which fully constrained C6 but allowed C2 to translate in the axial direction of the segment. Images were acquired at 4kHz, both for the DIC (Photron Europe Ltd, UK) and motion capture cameras (Qualisys Oqus 400, Sweden). The in-plane and out of plane displacements of each of the VBs were plotted as a function of time and the similarity between the curves thus obtained was analysed using the SPM1D technique which allowed a comparison to be made in terms of t-statistics. No statistical differences were found between the two techniques in all axis of movement, however the out of plane movements were characterised by higher variance which is attributed to the uncertainty arising from the near parallel positioning of the cameras in the experimental set-up.

Head collisions in sport can result in catastrophic cervical spine injuries. Musculo-skeletal (MSK) modelling can help analyse the relationship between players' motion, external loading and internal stresses that lead to injury. However, the literature lacks sport specific MSK models. In automotive research the intervertebral disc behaviour has been represented as viscoelastic elements (“bushing”), whose stiffness and damping parameters are often estimated under quasi-static conditions and may lack validity in dynamic impacts. The aim of this study was to develop a validated cervical spine model for axial impacts for future use in the analysis of head-first rugby collisions.

A drop test rig was used to replicate a sub-catastrophic axial head impact. A load of 80 N from 0.5 m was applied to the cranial aspect of a C2-C6 porcine spinal specimen mounted in the neutral position. The 3D motion of C3-C5 vertebras (4 kHz) and the cranial axial load (1 MHz) were measured via motion capture (Qualysis, Sweden) and a uniaxial load cell (RDP Electronics Ltd, UK). Specimen specific models were created in NMSBuilder and OpenSim after the vertebrae geometries were obtained from the segmentation of micro-CT images of the specimens. The compressive viscoelastic properties of four vertebral joints (C2-C3 through to C5-C6) were optimised via a Genetic Algorithm (MATLAB v2016b, The Mathworks Inc) to minimise tracking errors.

The optimisation converged to a solution of 140–49000 kN/m and 2000–8000 Ns/m for stiffness and damping respectively (RMSE=5.1 mm). Simulated joint displacements ranged between 0.09 – 1.75 mm compared to experimental 0.1 – 0.8 mm.

Optimal bushing parameters were higher than previously reported values measured through quasi-static testing. Higher stiffness and damping values could be explained by the higher-dynamics nature of the event analysed related to a different part of the non-linear intervertebral disc load-displacement curve.

Femoral head collapse due to avascular necrosis (AVN) is a relatively rare occurrence following intertrochanteric fractures; however, with over thirty-thousand intertrochanteric fractures per year in England and Wales alone, and an incidence of up to 1.16%, it is still significant. Often patients are treated with a hip fixation device, such as a sliding hip screw or X-Bolt. This study aimed to investigate the influence of three factors on the likelihood of head collapse: (1) implant type; (2) the size of the femoral head; and (3) the size of the AVN lesion.

Finite element (FE) models of an intact femur, and femurs implanted with two common hip fixation designs, the Compression Hip Screw (Smith & Nephew) and the X-Bolt (X-Bolt Orthopaedics), were developed. Experimental validation of the FE models on 4^th generation Sawbones composite femurs (n=5) found the peak failure loads predicted by the implanted model was accurate to within 14%. Following validation on Sawbones, the material modulus (E) was updated to represent cancellous (E=500MPa) and cortical (E=1GPa) bone, and the influence of implant design, head size, and AVN was examined. Four head sizes were compared: mean male (48.4 mm) and female (42.2 mm) head sizes ± two standard deviations. A conical representation of an AVN lesion with a lower modulus (1MPa) was created, and four different radii were studied. The risk of head collapse was assessed from (1) the critical buckling pressure and (2) the peak failure stress.

The likelihood of head collapse was reduced by implantation of either fixation device. Smaller head sizes and greater AVN lesion size increased the risk of femoral head collapse. These results indicate the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with a hip fixation device does not increase the risk of head collapse; however, patient factors such as small head size and AVN severity significantly increase the risk.

Introduction

Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing arthroplasty is a popular choice for young and active patients. However, there are concerns recently regarding soft tissue masses or pseudotumours. The appearance of these complications is thought to be related blood metal ion levels. The level of metal ions in blood is thought to be the result of MoM wear. In the present study the contribution of acetabulum orientation to stress distribution was investigated.

Femoral stem varus has been associated with poorer results. We report the incidence of varus/valgus malalignment of the Exeter polished, double taper design in a multicentre prospective study. The surgical outcomes at a minimum of five year and complication rates are also reported.

A multicentre prospective study of 987 total hip replacements was undertaken to investigate whether there is an association between surgical outcome and femoral stem malalignment. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Oxford hip score (OHS) at five years. Secondary outcomes included the rate of dislocation and revision.

The incidence of varus and valgus malignment were 7.1% and 2.6% respectively. There was no significant difference in OHS between neutral and malaligned femoral stems at 5 years (neutral, mean = 40.2; varus, mean 39.3, p = 0.465; valgus, mean = 40.9, p = 0.605). There was no significant difference in dislocation rate between the groups (p = 0.66). There was also no significant difference in revision rate (p = 0.34).

This study provides evidence that the Exeter stem is extremely tolerant of varus and valgus malalignment, both in terms of outcome and complication rate.

Studies using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) have shown that the femoral components of cemented total hip replacements (THR) migrate distally relative to the bone, but it is not clear whether this occurs at the cement-implant or the cement-bone interface or within the cement mantle. Our aim was to determine where this migration occurred, since this has important implications for the way in which implants function and fail.

Using RSA we compared for two years the migration of the tip of the stem with that of the cement restrictor for two different designs of THR, the Exeter and Charnley Elite. We have assumed that if the cement restrictor migrates, then at least part of the cement mantle also migrates.

Our results have shown that the Exeter migrates distally three times faster than the Charnley Elite and at different interfaces. With the Exeter migration was at the cement-implant interface whereas with the Charnley Elite there was migration at both the cement-bone and the cement-implant interfaces.