Purpose: With this retrospective study, the results of rotator cuff repairs in patients of 60 years and older were compared to patients younger 60.

Methods: 76 patients with an average age of 65 years (60–78 years, group A) and 167 patients younger 60 years (group B) were clinical (Constant – score) and sonographical examined after follow-up of 2 years after reconstruction of the rotator cuff.

Results: In group A, 24 one-, 37 two-, 11 three- and 4 four-tendon tears were treated and the average age and gender adjusted Constant-score was 90,4% (13–126%). 29% showed sonographical signs of a re-defect. In group B, 56 one-, 69 two-, 33 three-, and 9 four-tendon tears were treated and the average age and gender adjusted Constant-score was 81,1% (15–116%). 32% showed sonographical signs of a re-defect.

Conclusion: Both groups did not show significant differences regarding clinical results in the Constant-score size of the rotator cuff defect or occurrence of re-tears. The results in patients older 60 were even better than in younger patients, therefore the older age of the patient should not be primary reason for not repairing a symptomatic rotator cuff tear.