Infections in orthopaedic surgery are costly, debilitating complications. The search for new treatments and prevention strategies has led to the use of antibiotic-filled calcium sulfate (CaS) as a bone void filler that is both safe and effective. The purpose of this study was to examine the available data on the efficacy of this technology. A literature search was performed for studies that evaluated the use of antibiotic-loaded CaS cement in orthopaedics published between inception of the databases to 2017. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published in the English language that met the following criteria: 1) patients underwent an orthopaedic procedure; 2) CaS cement with an antibiotic was used; and 3) at least one of our outcomes were mentioned. Outcomes included resolution of infection, complications related to treatment, subsequent surgeries, overall infection rate, fracture union rate, clinical outcomes, and wound complications. A total of 17 studies were included.Purpose
Methods
A meta-analysis was performed to compare rate of SSI after application of chlorhexidine vs. iodine in total joint arthroplasty. Chlorhexidine had significantly lower odds of SSI. Surgical site infections (SSI) are a significant source of morbidity and mortality. The optimal preoperative skin preparation in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains debatable between chlorhexidine and iodine-containing solutions. This meta-analysis sought compare SSI rates between chlorhexidine cloth application the night before surgery plus povidone-iodine-alcohol (povidone-iodine) solution at surgery or only povidone-iodine at surgery.Summary
Introduction
