Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) are critical to understanding changes in patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The usage and adoption of MCIDs not been well-studied. This study was performed to IDENTIFY trends in PROM and MCID use after TJA over the past decade. All articles published in the calendar years of 2010 and 2020 in CORR, JBJS, and the Journal of Arthroplasty were reviewed. Articles relating to clinical outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were included. For each article, all reported PROMs and (if present) accompanying MCIDs were recorded. The use of PROMs and MCIDs were compared between articles published in 2010 and 2020.Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Total hip arthroplasty and hemi-arthroplasty are becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the United States. Both appear to be safe and effective treatment options, with rare acute adverse events and low mortality. Femoral neck fractures are one of the most frequent orthopaedic injuries seen in the United States (US). Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) are commonly used to treat displaced intra-capsular femoral neck fractures, but controversy currently exists regarding the preferred modality. The purpose of this study was to assess recent national trends in THA and HA performed for femoral neck fracture and to evaluate perioperative outcomes for each treatment group.Summary Statement
Introduction
