Dedication to quality has a longstanding tradition within the Schulthess Clinic. Pioneering documentation Maurice E. Müller initiated an International Documentation & Evaluation System (IDES) in the era of hip replacement becoming an increasingly wide spread and standardized procedure. Starting in 1984, IDES was used to document each and every hip replacement and as of 1995 also for every knee arthroplasty performed. Norbert Gschwend became the driving authority in the clinic for standardizing documentation and regular long term follow-up intervals for all patients. With increasing interest in patient reported outcomes (PROMs) a shift took place in the basic conception and electronic means (iPads) were introduced in 2012 to let patients complete their part of questionnaires, i.e. EQ-5D, OHS, OKS, UCLA & WOMAC while the clinical part was addressed in the same manner using HHS & KSS. Optimizing user experience while answering routine questions and allowing for the physician to quickly enter required data without the numbing experience of ever same paper forms largely increased the return on information. This approach also guarantees for complete data sets, often a problem when using pen and paper. Using these modern tools in combination with a refined recall procedure, we today show follow-up rates of well over 90% in the first post-operative years vs rates of 80% or less prior to introduction. As of late 2012 the Swiss implant registry for knees & hips was introduced and here again we today use iPads with an app specifically designed to quickly document and register all operations on a daily base, reducing the chore of using paper or web based on line options from 3 to 10 minutes per operation to a mere 20 seconds, fully plausibilized and in this way never returned for corrections. Pooling this data allows not only for generalized and stringent quality control but also facilitates spotting aberrant trends in the sense of an early warning system within our clinic with regard to procedures and implants. Pioneering this approach to facilitate & perfect all documentation related procedures we aspire towards an elevated quality level in reporting to help sustain & guarantee patient satisfaction despite the high day-by-day volume.
There is ongoing debate about the possible advantages of unicompartmental (UNI) knee replacement versus total knee replacement (TKR), such as for young, active patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate functional, radiographic, and device survivorship outcomes of UNI knee replacement with a newer generation UNI through 2-years post-op. A retrospective review of 188 cemented, fixed bearing unicompartmental (UNI) knee replacements implanted between January 2009 and June 2012 at 3 centers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship, reasons for revision, radiographic and clinical results. A chart review was performed to collect demographics, operative details, American Knee Society (AKS) scores and adverse events (AE) through 2-years post-op. Kaplan-Meier (KM) device survivorship rates for the partial knee construct were estimated for post-op years in which at least 40 subjects had later follow-up. The definition of revision was the removal of any component for any reason, and device survivorship was the lack of revision. The time variable was the time to revision if the knee had been revised, or the time to last clinical follow-up or death if the knee had not been revised. The average follow-up was 2.03 years (SD=0.4). The mean age was 64 years (SD=10.5), 56% of the patients were 65 years or younger, mean BMI was 27.5 kg/m2 (SD=4.9), 60% of patients were women, and 89% had a diagnosis of OA (9.6% had AVN). Data were collected through April 2015.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Patellofemoral complications remain a very common post-operative problem in association with total knee arthoplasty (TKA). As malrotation of the femoral component is often considered crucial for the outcome, we analyzed absolute rotational femoral alignment in relation to patellar tracking pre- and postoperatively and matched the results with the two year functional outcome. Femoral rotation and component rotation was assessed by axial radiography using condylar twist angle (CTA). The lateral patellar displacement, patellar tilt and Insall-Salvati index were measured on conventional radiographs. All assessments were done pre-operatively and at 2-year follow up. The series included 48 consecutive TKA (21 men, 27 women) performed at a single high-volume joint-replacement-center in 2008. All operations were performed using a tibia first-ligament balancing technique without patella resurfacing. The implant used was a condylar unconstrained ultracongruent rotating platform design. Outcome was assessed using the international knee society score (KSS) and the Kujala Score for anterior knee pain.Introduction
Methods
Peripheral nerve injury is an uncommon but serious
complication of hip surgery that can adversely affect the outcome.
Several studies have described the use of electromyography and intra-operative
sensory evoked potentials for early warning of nerve injury. We
assessed the results of multimodal intra-operative monitoring during
complex hip surgery. We retrospectively analysed data collected
between 2001 and 2010 from 69 patients who underwent complex hip
surgery by a single surgeon using multimodal intra-operative monitoring
from a total pool of 7894 patients who underwent hip surgery during
this period. In 24 (35%) procedures the surgeon was alerted to a
possible lesion to the sciatic and/or femoral nerve. Alerts were
observed most frequently during peri-acetabular osteotomy. The surgeon
adapted his approach based on interpretation of the neurophysiological changes.
From 69 monitored surgical procedures, there was only one true positive
case of post-operative nerve injury. There were no false positives
or false negatives, and the remaining 68 cases were all true negative.
The sensitivity for predicting post-operative nerve injury was 100%
and the specificity 100%. We conclude that it is possible and appropriate
to use this method during complex hip surgery and it is effective
for alerting the surgeon to the possibility of nerve injury.
Concerns recently arose regarding hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), mainly referring to the metal-on-metal articulation that results in increased metal ion concentrations and that may be associated with weird soft tissue reactions. Although a number of short-term reports highlighted excellent and encouraging outcomes after HRA, mid- to long-term follow-up studies are sparse in the current literature. This study aimed to determine the five-year results of HRA using the Durom® prosthesis in the first consecutive 50 cases. We prospectively assessed clinical and radiographic data for all patients undergoing HRA with this implant. Follow-ups were scheduled at six weeks, one year, two years and five years after surgery. All complications, revisions and failures were noted. Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and the range of motion (ROM) were determined preoperatively and at each follow-up. Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity levels were determined at the last control. Comparisons were performed using paired t-tests after testing for normal distribution. The cohort comprised 13 women and 36 men (50 hips) with a mean age of 53.3 ± 10.7 years and a mean BMI of 25.9 ± 3.7 kg/m2. After a mean follow-up of 60.5 ± 2.3 months five hips had to be revised, corresponding to a resvision rate of 10%. There occurred two femoral neck fractures (after two and eleven months) and one aseptic loosening of the femoral component (after 68 months). One implant was exchanged to a conventional stem-type design due to persistent hip pain (after eight months), and one hip underwent a femoral offset correction due to a symptomatic impingement between the neck and the cup (after 29 months). There occurred no intra- or other postoperative complications. Clinically, ROM significantly improved after surgery. Hip flexion increased from 91.1 ± 15.8° to 98.9 ± 6.5° (p=0.0007), internal rotation from 5.5 ± 6.9° to 11.1 ± 8.1° (p=0.0005), external rotation from 19.2 ± 12.5° to 28.8 ± 9.1° (p=0.0001), and abduction from 27.3 ± 10.5° to 40.2 ± 11.0° (p<
0.0001). The HHS significantly increased from 55.9 ± 12.3 points to 96.5 ± 8.5 points. The OHS averaged 14.3 ± 3.0 points, and UCLA activity levels averaged 7.7 ± 1.7. The present results demonstrate that despite satisfactory clinical outcomes in terms of patient scores and ROM, the high revision rate of 10% after a mid-term follow-up is disappointing.
Knee Society objective and functional score of 190 or above full knee extension and a maximum flexion of 125° or above excellent subjective patient rating. Thirty TKA of 29 patients (9 male, 20 female) with a median age of 70 years (range, 31–87) at time of surgery fulfilled the study criteria. All TKA were implanted at a single high-volume joint replacement center in 2002. In all cases both the condylar twist angle (CTA) using the clinical epicondylar axis (CEA) and the posterior condylar angle (PCA) using the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) were used to assess rotational alignment of the femoral component.
Overall outcome of bilateral hip and knee arthroplasty in the same patient with special regard to scheduling, postoperative complications and follow-up under consideration of the underlying disease.
More than 6000 primary THA and 5500 primary TKA were implanted at Schulthess Clinic since 1985, 8% of which in rheumatoid patients. Quadruple THA and TKA was performed in a total of 51 rheumatoid patients. Mean follow-up for knees was 8. 5 years (1–17), and 9. 5 years (1–18) for hips. 67% of implants were uncemented. In 21% of patients, all four prostheses were implanted within one year and in over 50% within a five year period.
Taking revision of components as failure there were three infections (CLS hip, GSB and LCS knee), two aseptic loosenings (Endler cup, GSB knee), two recurrent hip dislocations, three knee bearing exchanges (LCS, INNEX), and four patella component removals (GSB, PCA).
Quadruple arthroplasty in the lower extremity showed no increase of failure rate compared to single or dual arthroplasty patients. The results of this study support the indication for quadruple procedure with early postoperative rehabilitation and full weight bearing. Data suggest a procedure with hips before knees and at least two weeks between arthroplasty operations.
