Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a commonly performed procedure to relieve arthritis or traumatic injury. However, implant failure can occur from implant loosening or crevice corrosion as a result of inadequate seating of the femoral head onto the stem during implantation. There is no consensus—either by manufacturers or by the surgical community—on what head/stem assembly procedure should be used to maximize modular junction stability. Furthermore, the role of “off-axis” loads—loads not aligned with the stem taper axis—during assembly may significantly affect modular junction stability, but has not been sufficiently evaluated. The objective of this study was to measure the three-dimensional (3D) head/stem assembly loads considering material choice—metal or ceramic—and the surgeon experience level.Introduction
Objective
Improper seating during head/stem assembly can lead to unintended micromotion between the femoral head and stem taper—resulting in fretting corrosion and implant failure. There is no consensus—either by manufacturers or by the surgical community—on what head/stem taper assembly method maximizes modular junction stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A 2018 clinical survey found that orthopedic surgeons prefer applying one strike or three, subsequent strikes when assembling head/stem taper. However, it has been suggested that additional strikes may lead to decreased interference. Additionally, the taper surface finish—micro-grooves—has been shown to affect taper interference and may be influenced by assembly method. The objective of this study was to employ a novel, micro-grooved finite element (FEA) model of the hip taper interface and assess the role of head/stem assembly method—one vs three strikes—on modular taper junction stability.Introduction
Objective
Modular junctions in total hip replacement (THR) have been a primary source of fretting and corrosion which can lead to implant failure. Fretting is a result of unintended micromotion between the femoral head and stem tapers and is suspected to result after improper taper seating during assembly. Two design factors known to influence in-vitro taper assembly mechanics are relative taper alignment—mismatch angle—and the surface finish—micro-grooves. However, these factors have not been systematically evaluated together. The objective of this study was to employ a novel, micro-grooved finite element (FEA) model of the hip taper interface and assess the role of taper mismatch angle and taper surface finish—smooth and rough—on the modular junction mechanics during assembly.Introduction
Objective
