Surgical wound closure is not the surgeon”s favorite part of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery however it has vital rule in the success of surgery. Knee arthoplasty wounds are known to be more prone to infection, breakdown or delayed healing compared to hip arthroplasty wounds, and this might be explained by the increased tensile force applied on the wound with knee movement. This effect is magnified by the enhanced recovery protocols which aim to obtain high early range of movement. Most of the literature concluded that there is no difference between different closure methods We conducted an independent study comparing the complication rate associated with using barbed suture (Quill-Ethicon), Vicryl Rapide (polyglactins910-Ethicon) and skin staples for wound closure following TKABackground
Objectives
Complete Abductor Detachament, Direct Lateral Approach, Abductor Insuffenciency, Hip Arthroplasty Approach of Total hip replacement (THR) is a very important part of the surgery, the approach dictates the postoperative complications. Lateral approach is one of the most commonly used approaches. The initial lateral approach relied on bony (trochanteric) osteotomy which was later modified to tendon detachment, there are many versions of the lateral approach but the main goal is to detach the hip abductors mechanism to gain access to the underlying joint. One of the modifications is to completely detach the abductors tendon, this offers superior exposure compared to the traditional partial detachment (Hardinge) approach.Keywords
Backgroung
