Introduction

We present a single surgeon series of 20 modified Dunn osteotomies without surgical dislocation of the femoral head for slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE).

Modular hip designs offer potential for customising the implant to the patient. However, the more features a device has to offer, the potential for misuse increases. This paper will review one modular stem and the pearls learned over the years to make this a simple and reproducible surgical technique.

Over a 1,000 primary THA have been performed since the development of the proximal modular stem in 2000. The two senior surgeons developed the stem design and surgical techniques used and described here. Two additional surgeon co-authors have used the device as described confirming the design and techniques to be simple, reliable and reproducible.

Often the tricks of the trade go unpublished and each new surgeon is left to his own learning curve with new devices. As with any surgical instrumentation there are significant little techniques that often make surgery more reproducible and enjoyable.

Surgical technique should be simple and reproducible. We have found that even simple procedures—such as head resection—can, and do, impact the surgical process and can affect surgical outcome. Canal reaming, flute engagement, conical reaming, broaching, trochanter clearance, proper use of modular trials and implant assembly all play critical roles to a successful outcome.

We have found, and previously reported, that the use of this proximal modular stem design has reduced our leg length inequalities +/− 5 mm and has all but eliminated dislocations and aseptic loosening.

There were some mechanical failure problems (previously reported) on the first generation modular junction design that was identified and corrected (never exported outside the U.S.). There have been no reported failures since introduction of the improved modular junction six years ago.

Independent selection of femoral offset and vertical height is possible and we feel that restoration of joint mechanics is more reproducible with proximal modular devices as compared to monoblock stems. It is the responsibility of surgeons to communicate their understanding and experience with newer devices and not rely on industry to fill this function.

Hip fracture is a common cause of hospital admission and is often followed by reduced quality of life, or by death. International experiences indicate there are many benefits to be gained from national hip fracture registries. This pilot project aims to implement a hip fracture registry at three sites, a large metropolitan public hospital (Flinders Medical Centre), a large metropolitan private hospital (Epworth HealthCare) and a rural regional hospital (Goulburn Valley Health) to assess the feasibility of establishing a national registry.

Patients undergoing surgery for a hip fracture will be recruited from the three participating hospitals between March and September 2009. A minimum data set will be collected at discharge, from hospital records. Items include patient demographics, fracture descriptors, length of stay, residential status, mobility, health status, surgical details and discharge destination. A phone interview at four months after surgery will measure outcomes by using the Extended Glasgow Outcomes Scale and documenting residential status, mobility, hip pain and readmissions. Re- operations, if any, will be collected. The availability of data from State Health Departments for validation of hospital case data will be reported.

The pilot study is in progress at the time of writing. Ethical approval has been obtained, data collection, transmission and storage systems have been developed and deployed, and case data collection is underway. Case data will be summarised to describe hip fracture at the participating hospitals. Analysis will review the data elements in the pilot data set and assess their priority for inclusion in a national register—taking account of the quality of the data obtained and the time and other resources required for their collection. We will also evaluate the four-month review process. Any potential obstacles to a national registry that are identified during the pilot will be described and ways to overcome them will be proposed.

A national hip fracture registry will improve the quality of care and safety of patients following hip fracture by developing an efficient mechanism to compare and improve the effectiveness of acute health care delivery by all hospitals involved in the management of hip fractures.