By gaining insight into the Quality of Life (QoL) status and occurrence of complications, critical facets in the care for patients with Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) can be mitigated and measures can be taken to improve their outcome. Therefore, the aims of this study were to 1) determine the QoL in FRI patients in comparison to non-FRI patients and 2) describe the occurrence of complications in both FRI and non-FRI patients. An ambidirectional cohort study was conducted in a level-1 trauma centre between January 1st 2016 and November 1st 2021. All patients who underwent surgical stabilisation of a long bone fracture were eligible for inclusion. Patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16 or incomplete follow-up were excluded. QoL was assessed through the use of five-level EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires twelve months post-injury.Aim
Method
Fracture-related infection (FRI) is treated by adequate debridement, lavage, fracture stabilization (if indicated), adequate soft tissue coverage and systemic antimicrobial therapy. Additional administration of local antibiotics (LA), placed directly in the surgical field, is thought to be beneficial for successful eradication of infection. 1) To evaluate the effect of local antibiotics on outcome in patients with FRI. 2) To evaluate whether bacterial resistance to the implanted local antibiotics influences its efficacy.Background
Aims
Fracture related infection (FRI) is classically defined as early (0–2 weeks), delayed (3–10 weeks) or late (>10 weeks). Treatment strategies reflect this, particularly with debridement and implant retention (DAIR), but there is little evidence to support this. This multinational study clarified the relationship between pathogens isolated and time from injury. All confirmed FRI cases, managed surgically, at three hospitals were included. Data were analyzed on patient demographics, time from injury and pathogens isolated. Patients who underwent DAIR were also analyzed separately.Aim
Methods
This study investigated the effect of the choice of antibiotic regime on outcome of patients treated for fracture-related infection (FRI) at 3 centres, in the UK and the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019. All patients with FRI, confirmed by the FRI Consensus Definition1 and treated surgically, were included. Data were collected on patient characteristics, microbial cultures, antibiograms, empiric and definitive systemic antibiotic regimes and local antibiotic use. All patients were followed up for at least one year. The primary outcome was eradication of infection. The chosen antibiotic regimes were compared to the recent guidelines from the FRI Consensus Group2, to assess the correlation with outcome.Aim
Method
This study investigated the management and clinical outcomes of patients treated for confirmed fracture-related infection (FRI) at 3 centres, in the UK and the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019. All patients with FRI, confirmed by the FRI Consensus Definition1 and treated surgically, were included. Data were collected on patient characteristics, time from injury to FRI surgery, soft tissue reconstruction, type of stabilization and use of local antibiotics. All patients were followed up for at least one year. The rates of eradication of infection and union were assessed. The associations between treatment methods, time from injury and outcomes were determined.Aim
Method
Early fracture-related infections (FRIs) are a common entity in hospitals treating trauma patients. It is important to be aware of the consequences of FRI in order to be able to counsel patients about the expected course of their disease. Therefore, the aims of this study were to evaluate the recurrence rate, to establish the number of secondary surgical procedures needed to gain control of the initial infection, and to identify predictors for recurrence in patients with early FRI. A retrospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in two level 1 trauma centres. All patients between January 1st 2015 to July 1st 2020 with confirmed FRI with an onset of <6 weeks after initial fracture fixation were included. Recorded data included patient demographics, trauma mechanism, clinical and laboratory findings, surgical procedure, microbiology, and follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors for recurrent FRI.Aim
Method
Diagnosing fracture related infections (FRI) based on clinical symptoms alone can be challenging and additional diagnostic tools such as serum inflammatory markers are often utilized. The aims of this study were 1) to determine the individual diagnostic performance of three commonly used serum inflammatory markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Leukocyte Count (LC) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and 2) to determine the diagnostic performance of a combination of these markers and their value additionally to clinical predictors for FRI. This cohort study included patients who presented with a suspected FRI at two level I academic trauma centers between February 1st 2009 and December 31st 2017. The parameters CRP, LC and ESR, were obtained from hospital records when FRI was suspected. The gold standard for diagnosing or ruling out FRI was defined as: positive microbiology results of surgically obtained tissue samples, or absence of FRI at a clinical follow-up of at least six months. Separate markers were analysed using hospital thresholds, to determine current diagnostic performance, and continuously, to determine maximum possible diagnostic performance. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to obtain the discriminative performance (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic, AUROC) of (1) the combined inflammatory markers, and (2) the value of these markers additional to clinical parameters.Aim
Method
Fracture-related infection (FRI) is an important complication following surgical fracture management. Key to successful treatment is an accurate diagnosis. To this end, microbiological identification remains the gold standard. Although a structured approach towards sampling specimens for microbiology seems logical, there is no consensus on a culture protocol for FRI. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a structured microbiology sampling protocol for fracture-related infections compared to ad-hoc culture sampling. We conducted a pre-/post-implementation cohort study that compared the effects of implementation of a structured FRI sampling protocol. The protocol included strict criteria for sampling and interpretation of tissue cultures for microbiology. All intraoperative samples from suspected or confirmed FRI were compared for culture results. Adherence to the protocol was described for the post-implementation cohort.Aim
Method
