This study aimed to evaluate the BioFire Joint Infection (JI) Panel in cases of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) where conventional microbiology is unclear, and to assess its role as a complementary intraoperative diagnostic tool. Five groups representing common microbiological scenarios in hip and knee revision arthroplasty were selected from our arthroplasty registry, prospectively maintained PJI databases, and biobank: 1) unexpected-negative cultures (UNCs), 2) unexpected-positive cultures (UPCs), 3) single-positive intraoperative cultures (SPCs), and 4) clearly septic and 5) aseptic cases. In total, 268 archived synovial fluid samples from 195 patients who underwent acute/chronic revision total hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Cases were classified according to the International Consensus Meeting 2018 criteria. JI panel evaluation of synovial fluid was performed, and the results were compared with cultures.Aims
Methods
Data regarding the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US)-determined fluid film and joint aspiration prior to revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for suspected periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is limited. This study aimed to analyse (1) the value of US-determined fluid film, (2) characterisation of the pre- and intraoperative microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns and (3) the concordance between preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative culture results. We analysed 366 US-examinations from 340 patients prior to revision THA. Selected cases were categorized into clearly infected, non-infected and inconclusive, according to the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 Criteria. If US-determined fluid film was <1mm, no aspiration was performed based on our institutional standard protocol. Patients were grouped into no-aspiration (144/366;[39.3%]), dry-tap (21/366;[5.7%]) and a successful-tap (201/366;[54.9%]). The microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance patterns were determined and differences were compared between pre- and intraoperative results.Background
Methods
The aim of this study was to assess the incidence the microbiological spectrum and clinical outcome of hip and knee revision arthroplasties with unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) at a single center with minimum follow up of 2 years. We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively maintained institutional arthroplasty registry. Between 2011 and 2020 we performed presumably aseptic rTHA (n=939) and rTKA (n= 1,058). Clinical outcome, re-revision rates and causes as well as the microbiological spectrum were evaluated.Aims
Methods
The current treatment concepts of acute and chronic osteomyelitis are associated with unsolved challenges and problems, underlining the need for ongoing medical research. The invention and prevalence of an absorbable, gentamicin-loaded ceramic bone graft, that is well injectable for orthopedic trauma and bone infections, enlarges the treatment scope regarding the rise of posttraumatic deep bony infections. This substance can be used either for infection, dead-space, or reconstruction management. The bone cement, eluting antibiotics continuously to the surrounding tissue, outperforms the intravenous antibiotic therapy and enhances the local concentration levels efficiently. This study aims to evaluate the power and practicability of bone cement in several locations of bony infections. The occurrence of posttraumatic infections with acute or chronic osteomyelitis increases in trauma surgery along with progression of high impact injuries and consecutively high incidence of e.g. open fractures. We present a case-series of 33 patients (18w/15m; 56,8±19,4 years) with posttraumatic osteomyelitis at different anatomic sites, who were treated in our level I trauma center. All of these patients received antibiotic eluting bone cement (Cerement® G) for infection and reconstruction management.Aim
Method
The current treatment concepts of acute and chronic osteitis are associated with unsolved challenges and problems, underlining the need for ongoing medical research. The invention and prevalence of an absorbable, gentamicin-loaded ceramic bone graft, that is well injectable for orthopedic trauma and bone infections, enlarges the treatment scope regarding the rise of posttraumatic deep bone infections. This substance can be used either for infection, dead-space, or reconstruction management. The bone cement, eluting antibiotics continuously to the surrounding tissue, outperforms the intravenous antibiotic therapy and enhances the local concentration levels efficiently. This study aims to evaluate the power and practicability of bone cement in several locations of bone infections. The occurrence of posttraumatic infections with acute or chronic osteitis increases in trauma surgery along with progression of high impact injuries and consecutively high incidence of e.g. open fractures. We present a case-series of 10 patients with posttraumatic osteitis at different anatomic sites, who were treated in our level I trauma center. All of these patients received antibiotic eluting bone cement* for infection and reconstruction management.Aim
Method
