The care and cure of patients with low back disorders is of a multidisciplinary nature. Cooperation and communication between the disciplines would improve standardized care delivery to the patient. We engaged to establish a national group of multidisciplinary spine specialists to promote research and education in the field of spinal disorders. A multidisciplinary group of spine professionals, opinion leaders and research leaders in spinal disorders in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a national network (“Netwerk Wervelkolomaandoeningen”). The group consists of physiotherapists, family physicians, neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, anesthesiologists, as well as clinical researchers and epidemiologists. Group meetings were organized in various locations in the country. Priorities were set and divided in research and education. Communication lines were established with a resource website and a linked-in page. The first educational series of symposia for primary care professionals on multidisciplinary approaches for disc herniation and spinal stenosis is being organized in different regions in the Netherlands. The first meetings on research initiatives are being held on an idea-driven basis.Purposes of the study and background
Summary of the methods used and results
The objective of this overview was to evaluate the available evidence from systematic reviews on the effectiveness of surgical interventions for sciatica due to disc herniation. The last search was conducted in 2011. Since then new reviews have been published or existing reviews have been updated. A comprehensive search was performed in multiple databases including Cochrane database of systematic reviews (CDSR), Database of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) and Pubmed. Included are Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews on sciatica due to disc herniation published in peer-reviewed journals. We evaluated surgery versus conservative care and different surgical techniques compared to one another. The methodological quality of the systematic reviews was evaluated using AMSTAR by two independent reviewers. Nine, mostly high quality, systematic reviews on surgical interventions for disc herniation were included. Four reviews compared surgery with conservative treatment and concluded consistently that surgery has only short term benefits while the long term results showed no difference in effect. Four reviews compared open discectomy with micro(endo)scopic discectomy and found no significant and/or clinically relevant differences. The quality of evidence on alternative minimal invasive techniques (laser discectomy, automated percutaneous discectomy, and nucleoplasty or coblation) is consistently low in four recent reviews.Purposes of the study and background
Summary of the methods used and results
In a mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) stability is very important for the knee function and to prevent dislocation of the insert. A tension-guided technique to determine the position of the optimal posterior bone cut should theoretically lead to a better varus-valgus stability. The goal of this study was to measure the difference in valgus laxity in flexion and extension between a tension-guided and spacer-guided system for mobile-bearing UKA. Also clinical function was evaluated between the groups. A tension-guided UKA system (BalanSysTM, Mathys, Bettlach, Switzerland) was compared with a retrospective group of a spacer-guided system (Oxford, Biomet Ltd, Bridgend, UK). A total of 30 tension-guided UKAs were placed and compared to 35 spacer-guided prostheses. Valgus laxity was measured at least 6 months postoperatively in both groups using stress radiographs. The flexion stress radiographs were made fluoroscopically aided in 70 degrees of knee flexion. Laxity measurements in extension were performed on stress radiographs obtained with the Telos device. Knee Society Scores (KSS) were obtained at follow-up.Background
Patients and Methods
