Knee joint distraction (KJD) has been associated with clinical and structural improvement and synovial fluid (SF) marker changes. However, structural changes have not yet been shown satisfactorily in regular care, since radiographic acquisition was not fully standardized. AI-based modules have shown great potential to reduce reading time, increase inter-reader agreement and therefore function as a tool for treatment outcome assessment. The objective was to analyse structural changes after KJD in patients using this AI-based measurement method, and relate these changes to clinical outcome and SF markers. 20 knee OA patients (<65 years old) were included in this study. KJD treatment was performed using an external fixation device, providing 5 mm distraction for 6 weeks. SF was aspirated before, during and immediately after treatment. Weight-bearing antero-posterior knee radiographs and WOMAC questionnaires were collected before and ~one year after treatment. Radiographs were analysed with the Knee Osteoarthritis Labelling Assistant (KOALA, IB Lab GmbH, Vienna, Austria), and 10 pre-defined biomarker levels in SF were measured by immunoassay. Radiographic one-year changes were analysed and linear regression was used to calculate associations between changes in standardized joint space width (JSW) and WOMAC, and changes in JSW and SF markers. After treatment, radiographs showed an improvement in Kellgren-Lawrence grade in 7 of 16 patients that could be evaluated; 3 showed a worsening. Joint space narrowing scores and continuous JSW measures improved especially medially. A greater improvement in JSW was significantly associated with a greater improvement in WOMAC pain (β=0.64;p=0.020). A greater increase in MCP1 (β=0.67;p=0.033) and lower increase in TGFβ1 (β=-0.787;p=0.007) were associated with JSW improvement. Despite the small number of patients, also in regular care KJD treatment shows joint repair as measured automatically on radiographs, significantly associated with certain SF marker change and even with clinical outcome.
Methods: To participate in this study with a follow-up of 2 years the children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) had at least a restricted level of ambulation according to the criteria of Bleck and no history of prior bisphospho-nate use. Primary outcome measurements were BMD (L1-L4 and calcaneus), functional outcome (Bleck, Pediatric Disability Inventory (PEDI) and muscle strength) and quality of life (self-perception profile for children by Harter (CBSK)). Additional outcomes were sitting height, vertebral height (mean L1-L4) and fracture rate. Thirty-four children were included. Half of the children were treated with Olpadronate (dimethyl-APD, 10mg/m2/day), the others received placebo tablets. All children were supplied with calcium (500mg/m2/day) and vitamin D (400 I.U./day). Results: Thirty-two children completed the two-year follow-up period of the study, 15 of them in the Olpadro-nate and 17 in the placebo group. The mean ages were 10.4 (SD 2.8) and 10.6 (SD 4.0) years, respectively, in both groups. In the complete study group, spinal BMD increased significantly during the two years of follow-up (p<
0.005), but the level of BMD accretion per year in the Olpadronate group was higher than in the placebo group (p<
0.0155). Increase of BMD at the os calcis was also seen in both groups (p<
0.05) with a borderline sig-nificant difference between the groups in favour of the Olpadronate group (p=0.085). Sitting height, vertebral height and muscle strength increased in both groups without a significant difference between the groups. No differences in changes in functional outcome (Bleck, PEDI) or self-perception (CBSK, Harter) were observed. Fracture rate and the percentage of children with 3 or more fractures during the 2 years follow-up were lower in the Olpadronate group compared to the placebo group. No side effects of the medication were noted during this study. Conclusion: In this first double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study on the effects of bisphosphonates in children with OI, Olpadronate proved to be effective as demonstrated by a greater annual increase in BMD, independent from the effects of increase of age and calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Fracture risk seemed to decrease, however, given the interindividual variation in fracture rate within both groups, care must be taken in the wording of conclusions. The relationship between an increase in BMD and items such as functional outcome and quality of life remains unclear.